Displaying 20 results from an estimated 20000 matches similar to: "[LLVMdev] SVN Migration: Heads Up"
2007 Jun 15
0
[LLVMdev] migration to SubVersion successful or delayed?
Basile STARYNKEVITCH wrote:
> Dear All,
>
> according to http://llvm.org/SVNMigration.html the repository migrated to SubVersion (svn)
> on june 5th 2007 (almost 10 days ago).
>
The migration was delayed. The subversion software was supposed to be
configured this week by our IT department, but I have not heard from
them yet. I've fired off an email to see what the status
2007 Apr 21
0
[LLVMdev] Subversion Conversion: June 5th, 2007
All LLVM Developers:
This is your notice that the LLVM project is converting from CVS to
Subversion for its software repository. The conversion will happen on
June 5th, 2007 unless otherwise notified. Please see
http://llvm.org/SVNMigration.html for full details.
We had hoped to have the conversion done by now, but a number of factors
made it prudent for us to delay for a few more weeks. There
2007 Jun 15
3
[LLVMdev] migration to SubVersion successful or delayed?
Dear All,
according to http://llvm.org/SVNMigration.html the repository migrated to SubVersion (svn)
on june 5th 2007 (almost 10 days ago).
Did the migration happened as expected?
http://llvm.org/releases/ still mention CVS, and nothing on http://llvm.org/docs/GettingStarted.html#checkout suggest to
switch to svn instead of cvs.
What is the current best way to download the latest snapshot:
2007 Apr 29
4
[LLVMdev] SVN (?) Migration
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Tanya M. Lattner wrote:
> There was much debate about which version control system to switch to
> (please search the llvm-dev mailing list).
Well, I would if it were searchable...
> I think its best not to rehash this discussion. We have already begun the
> steps to convert to SVN.
I come from a different perspective. While I
2007 Jun 26
0
[LLVMdev] Subversion Conversion (IMPORTANT)
On Tue, 26 Jun 2007, Reid Spencer wrote:
> I know we've cried wolf before, but the conversion of the LLVM projects'
> software to use Subversion instead of CVS *WILL* occur on Friday June
> 29th with the following approximate schedule:
Great, I'm glad to see this happening. Thanks for making it happen.
One request: when the change goes live, please make sure the various
2006 Nov 27
0
[LLVMdev] moving to svn?
Rafael,
On Mon, 2006-11-27 at 16:05 -0300, Rafael EspĂndola wrote:
> Just wondering: Is there any plan to move to svn? I would love to have
> a diff command that works when I am offline :-)
Its been discussed from time to time. I would like to see this as well,
but for an additional reasons: simpler branch management and faster
updates, etc. SVN handles directories better and merging head
2007 Apr 06
0
[LLVMdev] New Web Pages
Hi Reid,
On 06 Apr 2007, at 04:51, Reid Spencer wrote:
> All,
>
> Just in case you missed the construction of these pages, I thought
> you'd
> like to know about these new ones:
>
> http://llvm.org/DevMtgMay2007.html
> All the latest details on the 25th May Developer's meeting. Page
> modified daily!
Do you know if there are plans for any form of live
2007 Jun 26
2
[LLVMdev] Subversion Conversion (IMPORTANT)
All,
I know we've cried wolf before, but the conversion of the LLVM projects'
software to use Subversion instead of CVS *WILL* occur on Friday June
29th with the following approximate schedule:
* 09:00 CDT (14:00 UTC, 07:00 PDT) - CVS becomes read-only
(commits prevented)
* 09:05 CDT (14:05 UTC, 07:05 PDT) - Final conversion to SVN
starts
* 11:45 CDT
2007 Jul 25
0
[LLVMdev] [Fwd: Re: svn issues]
This just in from Oscar ..
Reid
-------- Forwarded Message --------
> From: Oscar Fuentes <ofv at wanadoo.es>
> To: Reid Spencer <rspencer at reidspencer.com>
> Subject: Re: svn issues
> Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2007 19:09:17 +0200
>
> Reid Spencer <rspencer at reidspencer.com> writes:
>
> > Hi David,
> >
> > On Wed, 2007-07-25 at 10:38 -0500,
2007 Apr 02
0
[LLVMdev] CVS Branches To Discard?
Reed,
Can the "see" branch be renamed "SVA", for Secure Virtual
Architecture? This is the new name of the LLVA system and project.
It uses LLVM as the instruction set and compiler infrastructure.
Thanks,
--Vikram
http://www.cs.uiuc.edu/~vadve
http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu/
On Apr 2, 2007, at 1:08 PM, Reid Spencer wrote:
> All,
>
> We are considering removing some
2007 Apr 06
3
[LLVMdev] New Web Pages
All,
Just in case you missed the construction of these pages, I thought you'd
like to know about these new ones:
http://llvm.org/DevMtgMay2007.html
All the latest details on the 25th May Developer's meeting. Page
modified daily!
http://llvm.org/Users.html
A list of organizations using LLVM. If you want on this page send the
details here.
http://llvm.org/SVNMigration.html
2007 Apr 02
1
[LLVMdev] CVS Branches To Discard?
On Mon, 2007-04-02 at 13:30 -0500, Vikram S. Adve wrote:
> Reed,
>
> Can the "see" branch be renamed "SVA", for Secure Virtual
> Architecture? This is the new name of the LLVA system and project.
> It uses LLVM as the instruction set and compiler infrastructure.
Yes, we can do that. I'll add it to the conversion script.
>
> Thanks,
>
>
2007 Apr 02
5
[LLVMdev] CVS Branches To Discard?
All,
We are considering removing some branches and tags in the conversion
process from CVS to SVN. We don't want to do this in a vaccuum, so
please read carefully.
A deficiency in the cvs2svn script causes it to bloat the Subversion
repository (significantly, as in 10x) in the conversion of branches and
tags. We can minimize the impact of this by only keeping branches and
tags that we really
2007 Mar 23
2
[LLVMdev] June 2007 LLVM Developer's Meeting
I can't make it on the 22nd, but I will be there if it's on the 29th.
Ryan Brown
On 3/23/07, Reid Spencer <rspencer at reidspencer.com> wrote:
> Hi Sarah,
>
> On Fri, 2007-03-23 at 15:11 -0700, Sarah Thompson wrote:
> > I'll almost certainly come along, possibly with one or two other NASA
> > people.
>
> Great! If/when you know their names, have them
2007 May 10
0
[LLVMdev] 2.0 Release Process
Hello, Basile.
> What about the migration to SubVersion? Is it related to release of LLVM2.0?
No. It will be (possible) in the mid June.
> How will the svn migration happen?
http://llvm.org/SVNMigration.html
> When should it be preferable or possible
> to use the svn command (instead of cvs) to get the latest LLVM source code?
Soon after migration :)
--
With best regards, Anton
2010 Feb 15
0
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] Reminder: 2.7 code freeze in 1.5 weeks
On Feb 12, 2010, at 3:02 PM, Douglas Gregor wrote:
>
> On Feb 12, 2010, at 8:25 AM, David Greene wrote:
>
>> On Thursday 11 February 2010 18:17:33 Tanya Lattner wrote:
>>> Just a reminder that the 2.7 code freeze is on Feb 21st.
>>>
>>> All major changes should be committed approximately 1 week before the code
>>> freeze to ensure adequate
2007 Mar 31
17
[LLVMdev] May 25th 2007 Developers Meeting (Update)
All,
Here's an update on the Developer's Meeting. I've created a page for the
meeting on the main web site at http://llvm.org/DevMtgMay2007.html. If
you want to find out the latest, please visit that page. From here on
out, I will be tracking the meeting's progress on that page. However,
I'll still send out one of these update notes when there are significant
developments.
2007 Mar 24
0
[LLVMdev] May 2007 LLVM Developer's Meeting
All,
Due to a number of scheduling conflicts we've settled on a date quite
different from the original target: May 25th. This is a month earlier
than previously estimated, but this date is now firm.
May 25th was chosen because some of the organizers are traveling
internationally in June, the Apple WWDC is in early June, we couldn't
get a room, etc. June just turned out to be a bad
2007 Apr 06
1
[LLVMdev] New Web Pages
Hi Kenneth,
On Fri, 2007-04-06 at 08:55 +0200, Kenneth Hoste wrote:
> Hi Reid,
>
> On 06 Apr 2007, at 04:51, Reid Spencer wrote:
>
> > All,
> >
> > Just in case you missed the construction of these pages, I thought
> > you'd
> > like to know about these new ones:
> >
> > http://llvm.org/DevMtgMay2007.html
> > All the latest
2011 Feb 15
1
matrixStats: Extend to arrays too (Was: Re: Suggestion: Adding quick rowMin and rowMax functions to base package)
Hi.
On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 10:18 AM, TakeoKatsuki <takeo.katsuki at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Henrik,
>
> It would be nice if functions of the matrixStats package can handle array
> data.
> For example, rowSums() of the base package sums along the third axis of an
> array by rowSums(x, dim=2).
That is a good idea. This was indeed the initial objective before
starting