Displaying 20 results from an estimated 30000 matches similar to: "[LLVMdev] llvm-gcc compile failure on darwin8.8"
2007 Mar 12
1
[LLVMdev] llvm-gcc compile failure on darwin8.8
hello,
upgrading llvm-gcc4 from 1.9 release to trunk caused the following
build failure for me on darwin:
build/genattrtab /Users/ebner/dev/opt/llvm-gcc-svn/gcc/config/i386/
i386.md > tmp-attrtab.c
genattrtab: Automaton `ppro_load': Insn `ppro_fmov_XF_load' will
never be issued
genattrtab: Automaton `ppro_load': Insn `ppro_sse_icvt_SF' will never
be issued
genattrtab:
2006 Dec 20
3
[LLVMdev] Problems with new bytecode format
Hi,
I just updated my LLVM sources from CVS/HEAD and rebuilt them. And I
downloaded the GCC4 frontend from the 1.9 release.
Now I cannot compile anything, since GCC frontend seems to produce BC
files that cannot be read by llvm-dis, llc and other utils.
llvm-dis shows a following message:
Bytecode formats < 7 are not longer supported. Use llvm-upgrade.
(Vers=6, Pos=9)
But since the new
2006 Aug 04
0
[LLVMdev] Building llvm under cygwin
On 8/4/06, Anton Korobeynikov <asl at math.spbu.ru> wrote:
>
> Hello Anton
>
> Thu, 3 Aug 2006 23:13:52 +0400 you wrote:
>
> > I won't be available for the next 10-12 hours if you'll need some more
> > files.
> Well. I have one idea. Could you please execute "sort --version" from
> your cygwin shell and let me know, whether it's GNU one
2006 Dec 03
3
[LLVMdev] problem building gcc4 front end on fedora core 5
I'm getting a build error when trying to build gcc4 from sources. This is
for the recent 1.9 release.
How I built llvm-1.9:
-----------------------------
tar zxf llvm-1.9.tar.gz
cd llvm-1.9/
./configure --prefix=/custom/llvm-1.9
make ENABLE_OPTIMIZED=1 OPTIMIZE_OPTION='-O2' tools-only
make install
How I built gcc4:
-----------------------------
export
2007 Apr 01
3
[LLVMdev] trouble compiling llvm-gcc4 1.9
I'm having some trouble getting llvm-gcc4 to compile. It's unable to
compile darwin-crt3.c. It's mentioning "Complex expression. Absolute
segment assumed." but I'm not sure if that's a real error message. Has
anyone run into this before? I'm running on a G4 apple 10.4.8, kernel
version 8.6.0. I googled around and found a bug with the same error message:
2006 Dec 20
0
[LLVMdev] Problems with new bytecode format
Hi Roman,
On Tue, 2006-12-19 at 17:32 -0800, Roman Levenstein wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I just updated my LLVM sources from CVS/HEAD and rebuilt them. And I
> downloaded the GCC4 frontend from the 1.9 release.
>
> Now I cannot compile anything, since GCC frontend seems to produce BC
> files that cannot be read by llvm-dis, llc and other utils.
>
> llvm-dis shows a following
2007 Mar 01
3
[LLVMdev] compiling llvm-gcc4 on ubuntu
hello,
i am new to llvm and can't manage to compile the gcc backend.
my steps:
i compile the llvm-source first as suggested in "README.LLVM"
that works fine and without any issues.
then i make a new dir called build. from there i do the following:
stefan at ubuntu:~/programs/llvm/build$ ../llvm-gcc4-1.9.source/configure --enable-languages=c,c++ --prefix=/usr/local/
2007 Feb 28
0
[LLVMdev] Cygwin release build error
Hello, Aaron.
> /usr/src/llvm-gcc4/gcc/libgcc2.c: In function '__eprintf':
> /usr/src/llvm-gcc4/gcc/libgcc2.c:1832: internal compiler error:
> Segmentation fault
> Please submit a full bug report,
> with preprocessed source if appropriate.
> See <URL:http://llvm.org/bugs> for instructions.
You should:
1. Try to emit bytecode with --emit-llvm compiler switch.
1.1
2007 Mar 01
0
[LLVMdev] compiling llvm-gcc4 on ubuntu
Hi Stefan,
On Thu, 2007-03-01 at 23:26 +0100, Stefan Weigert wrote:
> hello,
>
> i am new to llvm and can't manage to compile the gcc backend.
Okay. Did you read: http://llvm.org/docs/GettingStartedGuide.html ?
>
> my steps:
> i compile the llvm-source first as suggested in "README.LLVM"
> that works fine and without any issues.
Okay.
>
> then i
2006 Nov 25
1
[LLVMdev] mingw binary is corrupt
Chris,
On Sat, 2006-11-25 at 11:39 -0800, Chris Lattner wrote:
> On Sat, 25 Nov 2006, Anton Korobeynikov wrote:
> > Hello, Matthew.
> >> Someone reported this earlier but the situation remains unchanged.
> > I'm sorry for delay. Files will be uploaded to LLVM download section
> > soon.
>
> Anton, you have commit access to the web page. Please just check
2006 Nov 14
0
[LLVMdev] gcc 4 frontend binary for mac os x x86
>> I assume you have an Mac with an Intel processor.
>
> Yes. Sorry, I forgot to mentioned it in the mailbody.
>
>> Download this:
>> http://llvm.org/releases/1.8/llvm-gcc4-1.8-x86-darwin.tar.gz
>
> I think that is the same tarball I used before.
Ok. I'm confused. Do you want llvm-gcc3 or llvm-gcc4? The tarball above is
a binary for llvm-gcc4 for Mac x86. You
2006 Nov 16
5
[LLVMdev] 1.9 Prerelease Available for Testing
First, thanks for testing this!
> Here's the results for GNU/Linux, 2.6.18-1.2200.fc5smp (Fedora Core 5)
>
> HIGH LEVEL COMMENTS
> * The llvm-1.9.tar.gz file unpacks to a dir named "llvm". Shouldn't
> that be llvm-1.9?
We have always labeled the dir just llvm which is fine. If you build llvm
it will know its version 1.9.
> * LLVM was built in Release mode
2006 Nov 14
2
[LLVMdev] gcc 4 frontend binary for mac os x x86
Hi,
On Nov 13, 2006, at 9:17 PM, Tanya M. Lattner wrote:
> I assume you have an Mac with an Intel processor.
Yes. Sorry, I forgot to mentioned it in the mailbody.
> Download this:
> http://llvm.org/releases/1.8/llvm-gcc4-1.8-x86-darwin.tar.gz
I think that is the same tarball I used before.
> Let me know if that doesn't work.
Again: there is no fixheader-script like you
2007 Feb 28
1
[LLVMdev] Cygwin release build error
Reid & Aaron
> > This is the same error that appears alot of times on the 'make check'
> > of the debug build.
> >
> > What is going on here please ?
>
> Sounds to me like the llvm-gcc being used wasn't configured using
> --with-llvm=. That message occurs when llvm-gcc is built
> "normally" (without using llvm).
Yes. llvm-gcc4
2006 Dec 21
2
[LLVMdev] llvm-gcc frontend 4 on intel darwin produces intel assembler
hi all,
i surely overlooked something.
but i am currently trying to do some benchmarking stuff with llvm.
in my thesis i was using llvm-1.5 (i did some extension work, which i
would have to frontport now).
But unfortunately 1.5 is for some benchmarks unstable (at least on my
box) such that llc sigsegvs sometimes, etc.
So I wanted to give 1.9 a go and build that on the my intel mac book.
I did
2006 Aug 03
0
[LLVMdev] Building llvm under cygwin
Hello Anton
Thu, 3 Aug 2006 12:38:54 +0400 you wrote:
> I've updated it yesterday and rebuilt - llvm built fine. But when
> building llvm-gcc4 (also updated yesterday from new /trunk
> directory) it fails with the same error.
You might easily get llvm-gcc4-mingw32 binaries from "prerelease"
directory. Since stdcall, fastcall & dllimport stuff is unsupported
right now,
2006 Nov 16
0
[LLVMdev] 1.9 Prerelease Available for Testing
On Thu, 16 Nov 2006, Tanya M. Lattner wrote:
>> * I don't think this is ready for release. In particular the llvm-gcc4
>> binary
>> seg faults on FC 5 for most of llvm-test programs.
>> * I'm going to re-try without using the binaries and building
>> everything from scratch.
>
> Does llvm-gcc4 seg fault for make check? I've done extensive
2006 Nov 14
2
[LLVMdev] gcc 4 frontend binary for mac os x x86
On Nov 14, 2006, at 8:30 AM, Tanya M. Lattner wrote:
>
>>> I assume you have an Mac with an Intel processor.
>>
>> Yes. Sorry, I forgot to mentioned it in the mailbody.
>>
>>> Download this:
>>> http://llvm.org/releases/1.8/llvm-gcc4-1.8-x86-darwin.tar.gz
>>
>> I think that is the same tarball I used before.
>
> Ok. I'm
2006 Nov 08
2
[LLVMdev] going from gcc 4.0.1 to gcc 4.2
Hello LLVM-people,
I realize most of you have other things on their head now, with the
1.9 release coming up, but I'd like to ask some questions regarding
the llvm-gcc frontend.
The current llvm-gcc4 frontend is based on GCC 4.0.1, as far as I can
tell from the docs. I also understand that GCC 4.1.x will probably be
skipped, to go to the upcoming GCC 4.2 release directly (which is
2007 Oct 22
1
[LLVMdev] cross compiling for arm-softfloat-linux-gnu (was troubles with llvm-gcc 4.0 and APFloat on X86_64)
Dale Johannesen wrote:
> On Oct 22, 2007, at 2:08 AM, Dietmar Ebner wrote:
>> next, i think (one of) the problem(s) is the use of
>> [HOST_]WORDS_BIG_ENDIAN instead of [HOST_]FLOAT_WORDS_BIG_ENDIAN in
>> llvm-convert.cpp (see patch below).
>>
>> this fixes single precision floating point but breaks double
>> precision.
>> for arm-softfloat-linux-gnu,