similar to: [LLVMdev] Problems with both the 1.9 Release and the CVS on Cygwin

Hi, While attempting to build the LLVM code from CVS today using gcc 4.1, I encountered the following error. Any idea how to proceed with the build? llvm[2]: Linking Debug executable llvm-as /home/ll/programs/source/scm/cvs/llvm/Debug/lib/libLLVMAsmParser.a(llvmAsmParser.o): In function `__static_initialization_and_destruction_0':

Hello, Reid. You wrote Friday, January 21, 2005, 11:14:41 PM: RS> FYI, work progresses on the Win32 native port which you might also find RS> interesting. It might even get done before the cygwin stuff. Jeff Cohen RS> is working on that. Perhaps he can indicate the status of that effort. There is too much work to do native Win32 builds. I've tried to get llvm compiled on mingw32

On Sun, 2007-02-18 at 21:42 +0000, Aaron Gray wrote: > Okay I have put a #ifdef HAVE_RLIMIT_RSS round the RSS code. > > There needs to be logic added to config system to complement this. > > Or shall I just use an #ifdef _CYGWIN_ ? Please just use #ifdef _CYGWIN_ > > Regarding the Bytecode writer stuff. I will try adding some inline > dis-ambiguator functions. Yeah,

Currently, Structure layout is left to targets, which implement them according to the ABI of that platform. While this is fine for most structures, it makes packed structures very ugly. All fields in a packed type must be converted to byte arrays with casts to access fields, which bloats accesses and obsfucates the types. First class support for packed types would clean up the generated code

> Please just use #ifdef _CYGWIN_ Okay >> Regarding the Bytecode writer stuff. I will try adding some inline >> dis-ambiguator functions. > > Yeah, I can't help you solve this problem because I don't have your > environment or compiler. However, this really smells like a compiler or > stdint.h bug to me. This code compiles fine on many unix platforms and

On Dec 6, 2006, at 10:44 AM, Andrew Lenharth wrote: > Currently, Structure layout is left to targets, which implement them > according to the ABI of that platform. While this is fine for most > structures, it makes packed structures very ugly. All fields in a > packed type must be converted to byte arrays with casts to access > fields, which bloats accesses and obsfucates the

Hi there, I'm trying to build llvm under cygwin running under windows xp, and have struck the following problem: -- llvm: tools-only built ok -- cfrontend: built ok -- llvm: full build failed at the following point: make[3]: Entering directory `/cygdrive/d/3rd-party/llvm/runtime/GCCLibraries/crtend' Compiling crtend.c to bytecode Compiling listend.ll to bytecode Linking comp_main.bc

>I successfully build CFE frontend at FreeBSD 5.3. > > Next nighttest run show more detail information :) After last 2 nighttest runs i see stable failure result: llvm[2]: Compiling dummylib.c for Debug build (bytecode) llvm-g++: installation problem, cannot exec `gccas': No such file or directory gmake[3]: ***

Hi: For some reason, I changed the files /ByteCode/Writer/Writer.cpp and /ByteCode/Reader/Reader.cpp and I introduced an new version number 6. Now I replaced these two changed files with the original ones that are version 5. And I rebuild the llvm compiler. What make me mad is that the bytecode produced now is still version 6! Of course the reader cannot recognize it because the current reader

On Wed, 12 Oct 2005 shding at mtu.edu wrote: > For some reason, I changed the files /ByteCode/Writer/Writer.cpp and > /ByteCode/Reader/Reader.cpp and I introduced an new version number 6. > Now I replaced these two changed files with the original ones that are > version 5. And I rebuild the llvm compiler. What make me mad is that > the bytecode produced now is still version 6! Of

This is a new build failure as of today. Does this look familiar to anyone? -bw llvm[2]: Compiling CommonProfiling.ll to CommonProfiling.bc for Debug build (bytecode) Intrinsic parameter #1 is wrong! i64 (i8*, i32)* @llvm.objectsize.i64 Intrinsic parameter #1 is wrong! i64 (i8*, i32)* @llvm.objectsize.i64 Intrinsic parameter #1 is wrong! i64 (i8*, i32)* @llvm.objectsize.i64 Intrinsic parameter

Reid, I think it is the first time it is run that the errors occcur !? Not sure but that would seem logical. Aaron

On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 11:49 AM, Gordon Henriksen <gordonhenriksen at mac.com> wrote: > Could you please update to r52213 or later in svn and check whether > this error is resolved with your gcc? Latest trunk fixes that error. Next problem :) llvm[3]: Building ARM.td register information header with tblgen llvm[3]: Building ARM.td register names with tblgen llvm[3]: Building ARM.td

I'm another new person to LLVM. I can't successfully compile and execute a simple C++ program. The compiler seems to work, as it produces a.out and a.out.bc files, but I get a whole bunch of warnings: WARNING: Found global types that are not compatible: "struct.std::messages<wchar_t>"* %_ZN9__gnu_cxx10messages_cE [16 x sbyte]*

Hi, I have a problem with compiling the new revision, the file Sifsegv_gc makes a call to the file Sigsegv.cpp but returns as file already allocated: ... llvm [3]: Compiling for Debug + Asserts Sigsegv.cpp build (bytecode) llvm [3]: Compiling Sigsegv.ll to Sigsegv.bc for Debug + Asserts build ( bytecode) llvm [3]: Compiling Sigsegv.bc to Sigsegv.s for Debug + Asserts build llvm [3]: Compiling for

Hi, I'm changing bytecode format a little bit, i.e. for 2 operands Instructions, the original is like this: 01-00:Opcode type 07-02:Opcode 15-08: Instruction type 23-16: Operand#1 31-24: Operand#2 My change is like this: 01-00:Opcode type 07-02:Opcode 15-08: Instruction type 16: myflag1 17: myflag2 24-18: Operand#1 31-25: Operand#2 I do

does anyone knows how to get the Olden BM bytecode files? We're low on disk space and I don't want to build the whole test branch (even if i can, which I doubt, it failed last time i tried).

On Sun, 15 Aug 2004, Robert Feldt wrote: > However, I wonder if someone supplies pre-built cfrontend binaries for > cygwin? Nope, we don't have one yet, sorry. > I followed the instructions and tried to build them myself but get > when building the cfrontend. Any ideas? That is really wierd. Looking at that line of gcc.c, I have no idea how it ever worked. In any case, this

I successfully build CFE frontend at FreeBSD 5.3. Next nighttest run show more detail information :) Vladimir

LLVMers, On the way to resolving bug 122, I am committing my SymbolTable rewrite. If you are working on anything that uses the SymbolTable, I suggest you read the documentation in include/llvm/SymbolTable.h. The changes I've committed reduce the use of Type::TypeTy. This static member will go away in the future, so please do not propagate new code that uses it. There is no reason to use it