similar to: [LLVMdev] libstdc++ as bytecode, and compiling C++ to C

On Mon, 2006-11-20 at 17:49 +1100, Emil Mikulic wrote: > I've compiled all the object files that make up libstdc++ and libsupc++ > into LLVM bytecode: > http://goanna.cs.rmit.edu.au/~emil/libstdcxx.tar.bz2 (438KB) > > A simple test program, x.cpp: > > #include <iostream> > int main() { std::cout << "hello world\n"; return 0; } > > $

On Mon, Nov 20, 2006 at 08:01:23AM -0800, Reid Spencer wrote: > On Mon, 2006-11-20 at 17:49 +1100, Emil Mikulic wrote: > > I've compiled all the object files that make up libstdc++ and libsupc++ > > into LLVM bytecode: > > http://goanna.cs.rmit.edu.au/~emil/libstdcxx.tar.bz2 (438KB) > > > > A simple test program, x.cpp: > > > > #include

On Mon, 2006-11-20 at 17:49 +1100, Emil Mikulic wrote: > I've compiled all the object files that make up libstdc++ and libsupc++ > into LLVM bytecode: > http://goanna.cs.rmit.edu.au/~emil/libstdcxx.tar.bz2 (438KB) > > A simple test program, x.cpp: > > #include <iostream> > int main() { std::cout << "hello world\n"; return 0; } > > $

Need to know if anyone has compiled the libstdc++ to LLVM bitcode. If it's available please where could I download it from? Thanks. Napi

Okay, let's try this again. I've taken all the source and header files needed to build libstdc++ and libsupc++, and put together a small and very simple Makefile that automates the process. Anyone interested can grab the whole thing from here: http://goanna.cs.rmit.edu.au/~emil/dietstdcxx.1.tar.bz2 (101KB) Usage instructions: 1) Run GNU make: $ gmake This will produce dietstdcxx.bc

On Fri, Sep 28, 2007 at 10:08:31AM +0800, Mohd-Hanafiah Abdullah wrote: > Need to know if anyone has compiled the libstdc++ to LLVM bitcode. If > it's available please where could I download it from? I did this last year. Check out: http://goanna.cs.rmit.edu.au/~emil/dietstdcxx.1.tar.bz2 --Emil

Emil, > # of expected passes 2243 > # of unexpected failures 7 > # of expected failures 5 Could you please provide a log here? It's interesting to see, what is failing now. -- With best regards, Anton Korobeynikov. Faculty of Mathematics & Mechanics, Saint Petersburg State University.

On Tue, Sep 18, 2007 at 06:41:38PM +1000, Emil Mikulic wrote: > The "make check" produced: > === Summary === > > # of expected passes 2209 > # of unexpected failures 41 > # of expected failures 5 > gmake[1]: *** [check-local] Error 1 > gmake[1]: Leaving directory `/home/emil/ll/objdir-llvm/test' > gmake: ***

On Thu, Sep 20, 2007 at 08:36:39PM +0400, Anton Korobeynikov wrote: > Emil, > > > # of expected passes 2243 > > # of unexpected failures 7 > > # of expected failures 5 > > Could you please provide a log here? It's interesting to see, what is > failing now. Sure: http://goanna.cs.rmit.edu.au/~emil/llvm2.1-check-armfix.txt I think

> On Tue, May 15, 2007 at 01:23:32AM -0700, Tanya M. Lattner wrote: >> 4) Compile llvm-gcc4 and llvm from source. Run 'make check' and do a 'make >> ENABLE_OPTIMIZED=1 TEST=nightly report' in llvm-test. >> >> It would also be helpful for someone to compile/test with objdir != srcdir. > > This is on FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE, on i386. > Both llvm and

On Tue, May 15, 2007 at 01:23:32AM -0700, Tanya M. Lattner wrote: > 4) Compile llvm-gcc4 and llvm from source. Run 'make check' and do a 'make > ENABLE_OPTIMIZED=1 TEST=nightly report' in llvm-test. > > It would also be helpful for someone to compile/test with objdir != srcdir. This is on FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE, on i386. Both llvm and llvm-gcc were compiled with objdir

On Thu, May 17, 2007 at 03:15:09PM -0700, Tanya M. Lattner wrote: > > Should configure also error out if perl isn't installed? > > Yes. Reid has changed this so that perl is now required. > > Thanks so much for reporting these! You're welcome! I'm still working on the "method four" testing that you requested. The "make check" is done, results

I've uploaded the 2.0 pre-release to this location: http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.0/ If you have free time and would like to help test this release, please download the appropriate tarballs from the website. Here are a few ways you can help test this release: 1) Download llvm-gcc4 binary and llvm. Compile and run make check. 2) Download llvm-gcc4 binary, llvm, and llvm-test. Compile, run

On Wed, Sep 19, 2007 at 05:24:12PM +1000, Emil Mikulic wrote: > http://goanna.cs.rmit.edu.au/~emil/llvm2.1-check-debug.txt Here's an ARM test that cores: $ llvm-as < /home/emil/ll/llvm-2.1/test/CodeGen/ARM/2007-01-19-InfiniteLoop.ll | llc -march=arm -mattr=+v6,+vfp2 Segmentation fault (core dumped) $ gdb `which llc` llc.core [...] (gdb) where #0 0x0853d606 in

On Nov 19, 2004, at 9:25 PM, Mohd-Hanafiah Abdullah wrote: > Dear Dr Vikram: > > I need to know how to invoke llvmg++ so that it generates C code. Here's how you can do a single file (i.e., an unlinked executable): llvmg++ -c infile.cpp -o - | llc -march=c -o infile.cbe.c Reid might be able to tell you how to do it with a single command using the llvmc tool. In future, please

On Fri, Sep 14, 2007 at 11:42:18PM -0700, Tanya Lattner wrote: > The 2.1 pre-release (version 1) is available for testing: > http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.1/version1/ > > [...] > > 2) Download llvm-2.1, llvm-test-2.1, and the llvm-gcc4.0 source. > Compile everything. Run "make check" and the full llvm-test suite > (make TEST=nightly report). > > Send

> llvm[2]: Flexing FileLexer.l > llvm[2]: Bison of FileParser.y SKIPPED -- bison not found > llvm[2]: Compiling FileLexer.cpp for Release build > /usr/home/emil/llvm-2.0/utils/TableGen/FileLexer.l:34:24: FileParser.h: No such file or directory > > Is this a packaging issue where FileParser.h was omitted > from the tarball, or does LLVM *need* bison in order to build? No,

On Sun, 10 Apr 2005, Markus F.X.J. Oberhumer wrote: > sys::Program::ExecuteAndWait() requires that the first element in "args" > should be the name of the program, but (at least) llvm-ld.cpp and gccld.cpp > fail to do so, thereby effectively swallowing the first parameter. > This is the reason that -native-cbe has not working for some time - actually > I wonder why no

Hi all, I want to test whether the MEAN of two different variables, (and different number of observations) are the same. I am trying to use the anova test but it doesn't seem to like that the number of observations are different: a=c(1:5) b=c(1:3) aov_test=aov(a~b) >>Error in model.frame.default(formula = a ~ b, drop.unused.levels = TRUE) : variable lengths differ (found for

Emil: I'm using LLVM 1.9 now. When I tried to do what you did I got the following though: $ llvm-g++ -emit-llvm -c x.cpp $ llvm-link -o=linked.o x.o std/*.o sup/*.o WARNING: Linking two modules of different target triples! WARNING: Linking two modules of different target triples! WARNING: Linking two modules of different target triples! ... $ lli linked.o lli((anonymous