similar to: [LLVMdev] instruction scheduling for stack machines

Hi! Apparently there are no precompiled binaries for llvm-gcc 4.0 for Linux. I've tried downloading the sources and building according to http://llvm.org/docs/CFEBuildInstrs.html (except I'm not an elite gcc hacker). I tried following the guidelines and got what looks like a gcc for x86 with no traces of LLVM. I tried passing --enable-llvm with various llvm root pathnames and got ICEs.

Hi! Apparently llvm-gcc ignores #line directives in source files when generating debug information. When I compile this: //test int f(int a) { #line 1 "someplace" return a*a; } //end with `llvm -g -S lines.c`, `someplace' is not mentioned in lines.s. It also looks like functions #included from header files get attributed to the #including file (albeit at the right line number).

Hmm, today I just tried compiling the llvm-gcc 4.0 frontend again on linux (Fedora Core 3 I believe) and I seem to be suddenly having the problem that Yossi Kreinin mentioned. The frontend seems to be using normal gcc to compile as I no longer get a bytecode file after compilation. When I pass the --version argument it claims to be the LLVM 4.0.1 frontend. Any ideas what might cause this? It was

Hi! The LLVM Bytecode File Format specifies an optional SectionID attribute for globals. I didn't find a matching attribute in the LLVM source code. Code such as: int a __attribute__ ((section ("A_SECTION"))); compiles with llvm-gcc, but apparently the section information is stripped (the object file doesn't contain "A_SECTION"). Is the SectionID feature

Hi! A (small) tar archive with files exposing an apparent LLVM optimizer bug is attached; I didn't find a way to attach files in the bugzilla interface. What's the best way to report bugs taking several files to reproduce? -- Yossi -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: bugreport.tgz Type: application/x-gtar Size: 2242 bytes Desc: not

Hi John, llvm-gcc4 by default emits object files, just as gcc does. This is by design. If you want to get bytecode output you need to use the --emit- llvm-bc option. A complete list of the options that llvm-gcc4 supports can be obtained with "llvm-gcc -v --help" (lots of output). Here are the descriptions of the --emit-llvm options: -emit-llvm Emit LLVM code to the

On 6/3/06, Reid Spencer <reid at x10sys.com> wrote: > I don't think anyone has successfully built llvm-gcc4 on Linux yet. I've > tried and failed. I have :-) There was some patches, but I believe that they were all merged in the latest snapshot. Rafael

Chris asked me to write up "LLVM Developer's Guide to Dwarf Support" for LLVM maintainers. We are still in early stages, but we thought we'd get it out there for the "need to bleeders." At some point this information will be formalized and added to the LLVM documentation. The enclosed document gives specific instructions for adding source line number support

Dear LLVM'ers, I am browsing the instruction schedulers available in llc, and there are many: -pre-RA-sched = {default, none, simple, simple-noitin, list-burr, list-tdrr, list-td} I looked into the sources in lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG, and I could find implementation of Sethi-Ullman numbering, list scheduling, etc. Now, I wish I could find some comparison between the

A more pressing need is a pre-regalloc scheduler that can switch modes to balance reducing latency vs. reducing register pressure. The problem is the current approach is the scheduler is locked into one mode or the other. For x86, it generally makes sense to schedule for low register pressure. That is, until you are dealing with a block that are explicitly SSE code in 64-bit mode. In that case,

Hi I encountered this problem a few times in the past, but only now it is consistent enough so I can write this email. In short, the problem is that after I copy some structure from the profiled program to the dtrace space, and set a "this-dataP" variable to point to the local copy, after a while some of the fields of the local structure are overridden with junk values. In

Hello everyone two small questions with hopefully short answer. 1)How can I send simultaneously a massage to all members on the network using smbclient??? 2)smbtar does not back-up files and folders with hebrew names for those files/folders so....? Thanks: Yossi Shani -> shaniy@actcom.co.il

Hi I'm looking for code that implements the 802.1d spanning tree. Do you have an idea where can I download this code? Thanks Yossi -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.linux-foundation.org/pipermail/bridge/attachments/20050818/692b471a/attachment-0002.htm

I don't think anyone has successfully built llvm-gcc4 on Linux yet. I've tried and failed. The instructions in CFEBuildInstrs.html are for llvm-gcc3 and probably won't work as-is. Reid. On Sat, 2006-06-03 at 19:39 +0300, Yossi Kreinin wrote: > Hi! > > Apparently there are no precompiled binaries for llvm-gcc 4.0 for Linux. > > I've tried downloading the sources

On Thu, Feb 04, 2010 at 13:59:08 -0800, Evan Cheng wrote: > A more pressing need is a pre-regalloc scheduler that can switch modes to > balance reducing latency vs. reducing register pressure. Right. I'm actually working on implementing a variant of IPS (Goodman and Hsu, Code scheduling and register allocation in large basic blocks, http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/55364.55407) based on the

Hello, I'm working on the text of my Master's Thesis and I have some doubts: 1. What algorithm is used in Selection Instruction ? What is the input ? 2. Where is described how the variations of List Scheduling work, in -pre-RA-sched phase ? -pre-RA-sched - Instruction schedulers available (before register allocation): =source -

On Feb 5, 2010, at 2:01 AM, Gergö Barany wrote: > On Thu, Feb 04, 2010 at 13:59:08 -0800, Evan Cheng wrote: >> A more pressing need is a pre-regalloc scheduler that can switch modes to >> balance reducing latency vs. reducing register pressure. > > Right. I'm actually working on implementing a variant of IPS (Goodman and > Hsu, Code scheduling and register allocation

"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst at redhat.com> wrote on 12/08/2014 12:18:50 PM: > From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst at redhat.com> > To: David Miller <davem at davemloft.net> > Cc: Razya Ladelsky/Haifa/IBM at IBMIL, kvm at vger.kernel.org, Alex > Glikson/Haifa/IBM at IBMIL, Eran Raichstein/Haifa/IBM at IBMIL, Yossi > Kuperman1/Haifa/IBM at IBMIL,

"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst at redhat.com> wrote on 12/08/2014 12:18:50 PM: > From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst at redhat.com> > To: David Miller <davem at davemloft.net> > Cc: Razya Ladelsky/Haifa/IBM at IBMIL, kvm at vger.kernel.org, Alex > Glikson/Haifa/IBM at IBMIL, Eran Raichstein/Haifa/IBM at IBMIL, Yossi > Kuperman1/Haifa/IBM at IBMIL,

Wine on Fedora 12 with all updates. Installed Tora Codes 2000 from setup.exe OK. When I start this program, I receive "Runtime error 53: File not found". There is no indication of what is missing. I suspect that some of the runtime is missing but I don't know what to install to correct this. I can tell you that this runs under 2000 and was released before xp was available. Thanks