similar to: [LLVMdev] gcc4 or gcc3?

Hi Hendrik, On Mon, 2006-08-07 at 14:35 -0400, Hendrik Boom wrote: > I just downloaded the CVS version of llvm and llvm-test. Presumably > this is the one that's scheduled to become 1.8 in a few days. Not really. The current CVS head is quite a ways past release 1.8 at this point. If you want to get the release 1.8 preview, please check out the release_18 branch: cvs co -rrelease_18

On Mon, 07 Aug 2006 11:45:04 -0700, Reid Spencer wrote: > Hi Hendrik, > > On Mon, 2006-08-07 at 14:35 -0400, Hendrik Boom wrote: >> I just downloaded the CVS version of llvm and llvm-test. Presumably >> this is the one that's scheduled to become 1.8 in a few days. > > Not really. The current CVS head is quite a ways past release 1.8 at > this point. If you

I just downloaded the CVS version of llvm and llvm-test. Presumably this is the one that's scheduled to become 1.8 in a few days. (1) To install llvm, do I really need the llvm version of the gcc front end? I have no special interest in yet another c/c++ conmpiler. (2) If I need llvm gcc, will the binary version suffice, or do I need to compile the CVS version? (3) If I need its source

Hi Michael, On Tue, 2007-01-16 at 13:13 +0800, Michael T. Richter wrote: > On Tue, 2007-16-01 at 02:50 +0000, Reid Spencer wrote: > > > The build instructions provided tell me to build llvm-gcc first from > > > the source. > > > The source for that tells me to build llvm first from the source. I'm > > > not sure where to go from this point. >

Devang Patel wrote: > > On Aug 23, 2006, at 7:00 PM, Emil Mikulic wrote: > >> Where -is- that documented? >> >> The only reason I know about it is because of how many times it's come >> up on the list. =) > > http://llvm.org/docs/GettingStarted.html ? > > ... > Example with llvm-gcc4 > First, create a simple C file, name it

On Aug 23, 2006, at 7:00 PM, Emil Mikulic wrote: > Where -is- that documented? > > The only reason I know about it is because of how many times it's come > up on the list. =) http://llvm.org/docs/GettingStarted.html ? ... Example with llvm-gcc4 First, create a simple C file, name it 'hello.c': #include <stdio.h> int main() { printf("hello

On Tue, 2007-16-01 at 02:50 +0000, Reid Spencer wrote: > > The build instructions provided tell me to build llvm-gcc first from > > the source. > > The source for that tells me to build llvm first from the source. I'm > > not sure where to go from this point. > You should build llvm first, then llvm-gcc. When I build LLVM first, however, I get told that it

>> I assume you have an Mac with an Intel processor. > > Yes. Sorry, I forgot to mentioned it in the mailbody. > >> Download this: >> http://llvm.org/releases/1.8/llvm-gcc4-1.8-x86-darwin.tar.gz > > I think that is the same tarball I used before. Ok. I'm confused. Do you want llvm-gcc3 or llvm-gcc4? The tarball above is a binary for llvm-gcc4 for Mac x86. You

Hi, On Nov 13, 2006, at 9:17 PM, Tanya M. Lattner wrote: > I assume you have an Mac with an Intel processor. Yes. Sorry, I forgot to mentioned it in the mailbody. > Download this: > http://llvm.org/releases/1.8/llvm-gcc4-1.8-x86-darwin.tar.gz I think that is the same tarball I used before. > Let me know if that doesn't work. Again: there is no fixheader-script like you

On Nov 14, 2006, at 8:30 AM, Tanya M. Lattner wrote: > >>> I assume you have an Mac with an Intel processor. >> >> Yes. Sorry, I forgot to mentioned it in the mailbody. >> >>> Download this: >>> http://llvm.org/releases/1.8/llvm-gcc4-1.8-x86-darwin.tar.gz >> >> I think that is the same tarball I used before. > > Ok. I'm

Ryan Brown wrote: > I don't think llvm-gcc4 uses gccas or gccld, but it can emit bytecode > if you give it the --emit-llvm option: > llvm-gcc --emit-llvm -c -o foo.bc foo.c That's a bit asymmetric with the previous gcc3 version, isn't it? That would mean that the "An Example Using the LLVM Tool Chain" section needs to be updated for the gcc4 frontend. OTOH, I could

> Well, it depends on the configure parameter used while building llvm- > gcc. Hmm, there are other pages on the the website that tell you how you should configure gcc, e.g. you're led from "How to build the C/C++ Frontend" at http://llvm.org/docs/CFEBuildInstrs.html to Subversion HEAD (by virtue of an "svn co"). Then you're supposed to look at README.LLVM. And

On Wed, Aug 23, 2006 at 06:38:36PM -0700, Scott Michel wrote: > There should also be a large notice in 40 point font and bold that says, > "gcc4 does not produce byte code by default: you must use the -emit-llvm > flag to get LLVM byte code." =) Where -is- that documented? The only reason I know about it is because of how many times it's come up on the list. =) (Which

I don't think anyone has successfully built llvm-gcc4 on Linux yet. I've tried and failed. The instructions in CFEBuildInstrs.html are for llvm-gcc3 and probably won't work as-is. Reid. On Sat, 2006-06-03 at 19:39 +0300, Yossi Kreinin wrote: > Hi! > > Apparently there are no precompiled binaries for llvm-gcc 4.0 for Linux. > > I've tried downloading the sources

Hi Michael, On Tue, 2007-01-16 at 10:24 +0800, Michael T. Richter wrote: > I'm trying to get LLVM1.9 working on my Ubuntu 6.10 system. The LLVM > version in the repositories is 1.7 and I've never managed to get it > successfully working because whoever packaged it thought it would be > fun to rename everything. This means I can't use it to build 1.9 and > I've

> I am wanting to upgrade my Fedora Core 6's GCC as it is version 4.1.1 > and that does not build LLVM-GCC4. What version of GCC is recomended ? The fine documentation says: http://llvm.org/docs/GettingStarted.html#brokengcc -Chris -- http://nondot.org/sabre/ http://llvm.org/

>> I am wanting to upgrade my Fedora Core 6's GCC as it is version 4.1.1 >> and that does not build LLVM-GCC4. What version of GCC is recomended ? > > The fine documentation says: > http://llvm.org/docs/GettingStarted.html#brokengcc Yes. But what version is recomended and tested ? Any post 4.1.1 ? Aaron

I'm looking forward to your patches and bug reports. I really want to get this going myself. -----Original Message----- From: llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu [mailto:llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu] On Behalf Of Anton Korobeynikov Sent: Wednesday, May 10, 2006 1:22 PM To: LLVM Developers Mailing List Subject: [LLVMdev] Successfulyl bootsrapped llvm-gcc4 on mingw32 Hello, Everyone. Today

LLVMers, This doesn't affect release 1.X users, only those using the LLVM current (CVS head) version. With recent changes, the current version of LLVM will no longer read old assembly or bytecode files. The upgrade path from 1.X to 2.0 is now provided by the new llvm-upgrade tool. See: http://llvm.org/docs/CommandGuide/html/llvm-upgrade.html for details on how to use this command.

Scott Michel wrote: > That part about "native" -- yeah, it's there. The existence predicate > returns true. IT'S SOMETHING THAT IS EASILY SKIPPED OVER WHEN SKIMMING > THE DOCUMENT BECAUSE, HECK, THE GCC3 DRIVER COMPILES DIRECTLY TO > BYTECODE SO WHY DOESNT GCC4? > > It's a "least surprise" issue. If gcc3 produces bytecode directly, why > did the