similar to: [LLVMdev] New llvm-gcc4 snapshot

Markus, We are in the process of trying to make this happen. It's a matter of getting all the duckings lined up in a row. We finally resigned ourselves to the fact that we can't cvs/svn and maintain the sanity of FSF branches, Apple branches and LLVM branches. So, over the next few working days we are going to set up a nightly cron script to checkout the latest and greatest

Hi All, Here are my notes for the LLVM 1.8 release, please send me feedback :). I'm sure I've forgotten and overlooked something, if so, please let me know! <Note: we're back to 3-month release cycle: yay!> ----- 8< ----- 8< ----- High Level Changes: *. Jim has finished enough support for DWARF debugging information that it is now enabled by default in

On Wed, 15 Mar 2006, Vladimir Prus wrote: >> Please give it a try and let me know if it works any better for you! > > Here we go: Wow, you are good at finding problems! Thanks! > -fvisibility=hidden -DHIDE_EXPORTS > -c ../../2006-03-14-llvm-gcc-4/gcc/libgcc2.c -o libgcc/./_fixunsxfdi.o > cc1: /space/p2/ghost/build/llvm-cvs/include/llvm/Instructions.h:72: void >

Hi, Here is the follow on patch for this problem. Please apply this from the top of the tree and rebuild. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: op Type: application/octet-stream Size: 2548 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20060315/eee8a766/attachment.obj> -------------- next part

LLVM 1.8 is available now! Download it here: http://llvm.org/releases/ Release notes here: http://llvm.org/releases/1.8/docs/ReleaseNotes.html This is a great new release with great new features and lots of refinements (better codegen, faster compiles, bugs fixed). One particularly nice feature of this release is that we're back to a regular 3-month release cycle, allowing users to have

>> Sorry for the delay, please try this tarball: >> http://nondot.org/sabre/2006-03-02-llvm-gcc-4.tar.gz > > There's some confusion with --enable-llvm configure parameter. I've built > LLVM to a separate build dir. The source is ~ghost/Work/llvm-cvs and build > dir is /space/p2/ghost/build/llvm-cvs ... > So, it seems like, at the same time: > > 1. buildir

On Fri, 17 Mar 2006, Vladimir Prus wrote: > Finally, will it be possible to provide an updated snapshot of the frontend, > so that I don't have to apply several patches to get it building? Sorry for the delay, yes, here you go: http://nondot.org/sabre/2006-03-23-llvm-gcc-4.tar.gz -Chris -- http://nondot.org/sabre/ http://llvm.org/

Chris Lattner wrote: > Here's a new snapshot of the front-end: > http://nondot.org/sabre/2006-03-14-llvm-gcc-4.tar.gz > > This: > > 1. Fixes the inline asm problem you have above. > 2. Includes patches to make it better on Alpha's (thanks to patches by > Andrew Lenharth). > 3. Sync's it up with debug info changes in LLVM CVS (by Jim Laskey). > 4.

On Wed, 3 May 2006, Anton Korobeynikov wrote: > You wrote Wednesday, May 3, 2006, 1:41:31 AM: > > CL> will fix it. If so, please let me know and I'll update my tree. If not, > CL> please get a stack trace of the failure so I can see where it is called. > Yes. This fixes the bug. ASM_OUTPUT_EXTERNAL was defined in cygming.h > and seems to be platform specific. There

On Thu, 2 Mar 2006, Chris Lattner wrote: >> Any ideas what could be wrong? > > Sorry for the delay, please try this tarball: > http://nondot.org/sabre/2006-03-02-llvm-gcc-4.tar.gz Actually, do to a recent change in CVS, this tarball will probably not work anymore. Please apply the attached (small) patch on top of it in the gcc directory. Worth noting, this front-end only works

On Wed, 1 Mar 2006, Vladimir Prus wrote: >> I just pushed out the latest version of my new GCC4-based llvm-gcc here: >> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2006-01/msg00931.html >> This email includes status and instructions for use. > > The instructions seem to have one path wrong. It says to get: I'll put together a tarball today. That will be easier than dealing with a

On Thu, 16 Nov 2006, Tanya M. Lattner wrote: >> No ppc, but x86 (Slackware 10.2) with LLVM 1.9 and its associated >> GCC4-based frontend (recompiled for my machine). I put the log file in >> attachment. A lot of failures arose from the fact that the ppc, alpha, ... >> backends were not built and hence not found. > > Ah yes I see. The test framework needs to be

On Fri, 12 Jan 2007, Nicolas Geoffray wrote: > I'm currently implementing a linux/ppc target in llvm. The abis between cool > Darwin/ppc and linux/ppc are different and I'm running into problems > with vararg calls. ok > Before a variadic method is called, an extra instruction must be > executed (which is creqv 6, 6, 6). This instruction is not necessary in >

Hello, Everyone. I'm currently trying to bootstrap llvm-gcc4 on mingw32 platform. Everything (except some small fixes) seems to be fine: stage1 finished successfully. I'm linking with debug variant of LLVM, since linker bug prevents release builds. Unfortunately, stage2 failes immediately with this cryptic message: $/f/tmp/llvm/gccbuild/gcc/xgcc -B/f/tmp/llvm/gccbuild/gcc/

Thanks all, I've incorporated all the feedback so far: http://llvm.org/ChrisLLVM/projects/llvm-www/releases/1.8/docs/ReleaseNotes.html -Chris On Tue, 8 Aug 2006, Bil wrote: > On Aug 8, 2006, at 10:28 AM, Chris Lattner wrote: >> >> Hi All, >> >> Here's the first draft of the LLVM 1.8 release notes. Please take a look >> and send me any comments

On Thu, 24 Aug 2006, Scott Michel wrote: > That's why I would either make sure that the difference is highlighted > in the FAQ and that the difference is highlighted in the "Getting > Started" pages. Otherwise, it'll remain a mailing list FAQ. Patches welcome. Please send a patch, or even just some suggested text, and we'll be happy to include it. Remember that

> I am wanting to upgrade my Fedora Core 6's GCC as it is version 4.1.1 > and that does not build LLVM-GCC4. What version of GCC is recomended ? The fine documentation says: http://llvm.org/docs/GettingStarted.html#brokengcc -Chris -- http://nondot.org/sabre/ http://llvm.org/

On Sat, 5 May 2007, Aaron Gray wrote: > I have successfully built LLVM and LLVM-GCC4 on GCC-4.2.0-20070501 on > Linux x86 32bit. > > GCC 4.2.0 RC3 is availiable from :- > > ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/prerelease-4.2.0-20070501 Great news! -Chris -- http://nondot.org/sabre/ http://llvm.org/

On Mon, 10 Sep 2007, Jose M. Moya wrote: > How can I do function profiling and BB profiling with current llvm and > llvm-gcc4? > > runtime/libprofile is disabled when using llvm-gcc4, but... is there any > alternative to linking with libprofile_rt.so? > > How can I use llvm-prof? is utils/profile.pl obsolete? The profiling support in LLVM hasn't been used for quite a

Hi Everyone, I just pushed out the latest version of my new GCC4-based llvm-gcc here: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2006-01/msg00931.html This email includes status and instructions for use. Compared to the old llvm-gcc, this front-end has many advantages: it is far faster, is based on GCC 4.0.1 instead of a GCC 3.4 prerelease snapshot, and it fixes several dozen of the "impossible to fix in