llvm dev - Nov 2006 - [LLVMdev] 1.9 Prerelease Available for Testing

Hi,

Bram Adams wrote:
> Tanya M. Lattner wrote:
>>>                ===  Summary ==>>>
>>> # of expected passes            1411
>>> # of unexpected failures        140
>>> # of expected failures          33
>>>     
>> Can you send the log file to the list? Is this ppc or?
>>   
No ppc, but x86 (Slackware 10.2) with LLVM 1.9 and its associated 
GCC4-based frontend (recompiled for my machine). I put the log file in 
attachment. A lot of failures arose from the fact that the ppc, alpha, 
... backends were not built and hence not found.
>> You should do "make TEST=nightly report" to get a
comprehensive report of
>> the llvm-test suite.
>>   
Ah, thanks. I ran the test suite and attached the results.

Kind regards,

Bram Adams
GH-SEL, INTEC, Ghent University (Belgium)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20061116/908df4d7/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: reports.tar.bz2
Type: application/x-bzip
Size: 10826 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20061116/908df4d7/attachment.bin>

On Thu, 16 Nov 2006, Tanya M. Lattner wrote:
>> No ppc, but x86 (Slackware 10.2) with LLVM 1.9 and its associated
>> GCC4-based frontend (recompiled for my machine). I put the log file in
>> attachment. A lot of failures arose from the fact that the ppc, alpha,
...
>> backends were not built and hence not found.
>
> Ah yes I see. The test framework needs to be modified to handle this but
> we havent gotten around to it. There is already a bug filed. Otherwise,
> test results are fine.
We could just make the testsuite detect that all the targets weren't 
built, and refuse to run the tests...

-Chris

-- 
http://nondot.org/sabre/
http://llvm.org/