similar to: [LLVMdev] How to link the right libraries?

On Mon, 1 May 2006, Fernando Magno Quintao Pereira wrote: > Hello, llvmers. Could someone explain me a little about the opt tool? I am > having problems to load a MachineFunctionPass using opt. I have this pass: MachineFunctionPass's cannot be used as part of opt, they can only be used as part of LLC. Further, you have to explicitly modify the target you are interested in to add it

I am trying to disassemble some bytecode using llvm-dis: llvm-dis -f -o llvmtest/sliceme2.cbc.ll llvmtest/sliceme2.cbc However, I am getting the following error. llvm-dis: Invalid bytecode signature: 464C457F (Vers=0, Pos=4) How do I go about figuring out what the problem is? llvmtest/sliceme2.cbc is newly compiled using the same version of llvm-gcc as llvm-dis. -- Ryan M. Lefever

Hi all, I started to write an LLVM backend for custom CPU. I created XXXInstrInfo but there are some problems. I searched for it but I couldn't find anything. Can anyone help me? include "XXXInstrFormats.td" def simm16 : Operand<i32> { let DecoderMethod = "DecodeSimm16"; } def mem : Operand<i32> { let PrintMethod = "printMemOperand"; let

Hi Ryan, On Fri, 2006-12-01 at 18:06 -0600, Ryan M. Lefever wrote: > I am trying to disassemble some bytecode using llvm-dis: > llvm-dis -f -o llvmtest/sliceme2.cbc.ll llvmtest/sliceme2.cbc > > However, I am getting the following error. > > llvm-dis: Invalid bytecode signature: 464C457F (Vers=0, Pos=4) The problem is most likely that sliceme2.cbc is *not* bytecode. Open the

On Mar 28, 2009, at 12:56 PM, Aaron Gray wrote: > How do I get the LLVM test-suite to work I have followed the /docs/ > TestingGuide.html but cannot seem to get it to work. I have tried > many variations, but get no joy. The docmunetation does not appear > very clear. Some things that are not so obvious: The testsuite has to be checked out as a subdirectory of llvm/ projects;

I ran the following command: llvm-gcc -Iinclude -Illvmtest -Wa,-disable-inlining -Wl,-disable-inlining -c -o llvmtest/sliceme2.bc llvmtest/sliceme2.c And it responded with the following: as: unrecognized option `-disable-inlining' Does -disable-inlining not work anymore? Thanks, Ryan

Thanks for the reply. Do I check it out under src or build directory ? I am sure I had all this working fine with no problems 2 years ago. Aaron ----- Original Message ----- From: Dale Johannesen To: LLVM Developers Mailing List Sent: Saturday, March 28, 2009 8:11 PM Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] LLVM test-suite On Mar 28, 2009, at 12:56 PM, Aaron Gray wrote: How do I get the

Before upgrading to the latest LLVM today, I used to run the following command: llvm-gcc -fno-inline -o __tmp.homer___ llvmtest/sliceme2.bc -L/home/testbed1/lefever/work/llvm/install/lib -lcrtend However, it is given the following error. /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lcrtend collect2: ld returned 1 exit status make: *** [llvmtest/sliceme2.cbc] Error 1 Has the crtend library been moved? Thanks,

Thanks for the quick responses, but unfortunately still no luck: > llvm-g++ -g -O0 -c -emit-llvm test.cpp > llc -O0 test.o > g++ test.o.s > ./a.out My return address is 0x400bb2 > addr2line 0x400bb2 ??:0 Also to further implicate llc, this works: > llvm-g++ -g -O0 -S test.cpp > g++ test.s > ./a.out My return address is 0x400bf9 > addr2line 0x400bf9

----- Original Message ----- From: "Chris Lattner" <sabre at nondot.org> To: "LLVM Developers Mailing List" <llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu> Sent: Tuesday, March 08, 2005 6:31 PM Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] Recursive Types using the llvm support library > On Tue, 8 Mar 2005, Vladimir Merzliakov wrote: > >>>> An example where something really simple like the

On Wed, 9 Mar 2005, Vladimir Merzliakov wrote: > I create test program and assert failed in it: > > { \2 *, sbyte * } > Assertion failed: (!NewSTy->isAbstract()), function main, file > /usr/home/wanderer/work/LLVMTest/obj/../src/tools/tool/Test.cc, line 28. > > Testcase source attached. Thanks, that definitely is a bug. Patch here:

2009/3/28 Dale Johannesen <dalej at apple.com>: > The testsuite has to be checked out as a subdirectory of llvm/projects; > llvm/projects/llvmtest or some such. > After doing that, you need to re-configure from the top level.  There must > be a working llvm-gcc in your path when you do this. I've got a makefile that tries to build llvm and llvm-gcc from source, and then run

Nick Jalbert wrote: > Thanks for the quick responses, but unfortunately still no luck: > > > llvm-g++ -g -O0 -c -emit-llvm test.cpp > > llc -O0 test.o > > g++ test.o.s > > ./a.out > My return address is 0x400bb2 > > addr2line 0x400bb2 > ??:0 > > Also to further implicate llc, this works: > > > llvm-g++ -g -O0 -S test.cpp >

How do I get the LLVM test-suite to work I have followed the /docs/TestingGuide.html but cannot seem to get it to work. I have tried many variations, but get no joy. The docmunetation does not appear very clear. Aaron -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20090328/e15c2e57/attachment.html>

Thank you for the help. There seem to be several things in my makefiles that are messed up as a result of switching from the gcc3.4 front end to the gcc4 frontend. Is there any documentation listing the things that have changed? Thanks, Ryan Ryan M. Lefever [http://www.ews.uiuc.edu/~lefever] On Fri, 1 Dec 2006, Reid Spencer wrote: > Hi Ryan, > > On Fri, 2006-12-01 at 18:06

Hi, I wrote a machinefunction pass to try to see what's going on. Does it mean that it is target machine dependent pass, like x86? However, after compile it, I found there wasnot command option I registered. I used regular way to do it like RegisterOpt <...> X("... ", "... "), but I cannot see the optimized option when I use opt -load ../../lib/Debug/libxxx.so

hello everybody, I would like to improve the llvm-test suite[1] as a part of GSoC 2008 program for LLVM. I have few concerns/problems regarding this, please give me your feedbacks and suggestions to come up with the proper proposal. *Goal:* Improve the llvm-test testsuite. *Idea:* Extend the llvm-test testsuite to include new programs and benchmarks[2]. Test programs should be more CPU intensive

Hi Sanjoy, >> I'm not familiar with fiber-type APIs, but I assume fiber_fork is like >> setjmp, in that it can "return twice"? Yes, user-mode stack switching API are somewhat similar to setjmp. Here are links to a doc page and implementation, just in case you are curious: http://www.boost.org/doc/libs/1_59_0/libs/context/doc/html/context/context.html

Test Cases: (attached) Iteration code: (...) typedef TarjanSCC_iterator<CallGraph*> MyTarjan; CallGraph& callGraph = getAnalysis<CallGraph>(); MyTarjan iter = tarj_begin(&callGraph); MyTarjan end = tarj_end(&callGraph); while(iter!=end) iter++; (...) if you take the time to print out the function each non-looping node iter traverses, it never reaches main...

Thanks, I've been through the documentation, and if I visit main, i think everything will turn out correctly... Printing out the Call graph reveals that main is calling this external node i think you are making reference to. Could this be the problem? Dave On Fri, 6 Dec 2002, Chris Lattner wrote: > > if you take the time to print out the function each non-looping node iter >