similar to: [LLVMdev] First draft of release notes done

Chris, Here's my review notes: 1. In the Known problems section you identify PR656 as a known problem. However, this bug is resolved and in January you reported that you verified it on Solaris. So, one of two things needs to happen. Either remove this item from the release notes, or re-open the bug and tell me what still breaks. 2. It seems that several items from the original DRAFT email

Hi Everyone, Here are my notes on the LLVM 1.7 release, which will go into the final release announcement. As Tanya mentioned, it has been far too long since the last release, and there have been a lot of CVS commits since Novemeber. :) I went through them all and pulled out some of the major improvements, which I've listed below. I'm certain that I have forgotten some things, so

Feedback below.. > <will insert overview blurb here> Big new things: llvm-gcc4, new sparc > backend, Generic vector/SSE/Altivec support, X86 Scalar SSE support, > debugging support, many target-independent codegen improvements, inline asm, > llvm.org/web-reg. > > > Core LLVM IR Improvements: > > * The LLVM IR now has full support for representing

> Please take a look: > http://llvm.org/docs/ReleaseNotes.html GCC4.0-based llvm-gcc front-end section: Replace the second "in addition" with something else. "If you can use it, llvm-gcc4 is offers significant new functionality": remove is "In 1.8, it will be removed, replaced with the new SPARC backend." and replaced (no comma) "now have initial

On Friday 21 September 2007, Chris Lattner wrote: > In addition to this, I've checked in the first draft of the release > notes into llvm/docs/ReleaseNotes.html (http://llvm.org/docs/ > ReleaseNotes.html). The release notes mention llvm-gcc 4.2, but the prerelease only included llvm-gcc 4.0. Is the final release going to include 4.0 or 4.2 or both? Bye, Maarten --------------

Hi All, Here is my current draft of the LLVM 2.1 release announcement. Unlike previous announcements, I'm not planning to largely duplicate the release notes in the announcement. In addition to this, I've checked in the first draft of the release notes into llvm/docs/ReleaseNotes.html (http://llvm.org/docs/ ReleaseNotes.html). I'd really appreciate it if anyone who

Hi All, Here's the first draft of the LLVM 1.8 release notes. Please take a look and send me any comments or feedback you have: http://llvm.org/docs/ReleaseNotes.html Thanks! -Chris -- http://nondot.org/sabre/ http://llvm.org/

>> In addition to this, I've checked in the first draft of the release >> notes into llvm/docs/ReleaseNotes.html (http://llvm.org/docs/ >> ReleaseNotes.html). > > The release notes mention llvm-gcc 4.2, but the prerelease only included > llvm-gcc 4.0. Is the final release going to include 4.0 or 4.2 or both? I will be releasing a source tar ball of llvm-gcc4.2, but

On Aug 8, 2006, at 10:28 AM, Chris Lattner wrote: > > Hi All, > > Here's the first draft of the LLVM 1.8 release notes. Please take > a look and send me any comments or feedback you have: > http://llvm.org/docs/ReleaseNotes.html > Trivial changes: * Most of LLVM is now built with "-pedantic", ensuring better portability to more C++ Compilers. Probably

Hi All, The first draft of the release notes are now done (many thanks to Tanya for pulling together info from the announcements): http://llvm.org/docs/ReleaseNotes.html If you have comments/feedback, please let me know, or - better yet - just commit improvements to mainline :) -Chris -- http://nondot.org/sabre/ http://llvm.org/

Hello Chris Tue, 8 Aug 2006 10:28:44 -0700 (PDT) you wrote: > Here's the first draft of the LLVM 1.8 release notes. Please take a > look and send me any comments or feedback you have: > http://llvm.org/docs/ReleaseNotes.html I think list of platforms should include "Intel and AMD machines running on Win32 using MinGW libraries (native)". Or something like this. -- With

misspellings: What's new, 1st paragraph: "nightly tester <http://llvm.org/nightlytest/>, llvm-config enhancEments"; 've found nothing wrong except of it :) On 8/8/06, Chris Lattner <sabre at nondot.org> wrote: > > > Hi All, > > Here's the first draft of the LLVM 1.8 release notes. Please take a look > and send me any comments or feedback you

Hello A couple of days ago, I did the Spanish translation for ReleaseNotes CentOS 5.6 and I have some questions Right now, in the Spanish version we are using nice icons for "Notes". Would you like the same in the English and other translated versions ? (I know that is not important, just looks nice ;-) ) On many places we mention packages names or file names. I suggest use

Hi, I would like to contribute to the CentOS wiki by adding a new page for the CentOS LiveCD 5.1 release notes. This page should be located somewhere like: http://wiki.centos.org/Manuals/ReleaseNotes/CentOSLiveCD5.1 Username: PatriceGuay Regards, -- Patrice Guay

Hi All, Please review the 2.5 release notes here: http://llvm.org/docs/ReleaseNotes.html Let me know if you have any additions, improvements, or see any oversights. If you have commit access, please just directly change the document. The release is planned to go out in about 24 hours from now! Thanks! -Chris

Hi all! Please remember to update the release notes! We're getting close to the release date, and we need the notes to be up-to-date. Also, if you have a project which uses LLVM, please send me a blurb about it and I can add it to our "external projects" list (or, if you have commit access, you can add it). Thanks! -bw

Hi Since some time ago, I have been contributing as Spanish translator of "Release notes" (and some other wiki content). The "Release notes" has some parts which are common for all translated versions, by sample: 'sha1sum' , 'translations' I sugest start to using the macro 'Include' for the next releases. I'm not an MoinMoin expert but AFAIKU this

Ok, the LLVM 2.7 release notes are in near final shape. Please take a look and suggest improvements (or, better yet, just commit improvements if you have commit access): http://llvm.org/docs/ReleaseNotes.html Things still needed are marked with FIXMEs. These include: 1. Clang needs a blurb describing what's new in 2.7. Have the clang folks been doing anything for the last 6 months? 2. I

I created both English and French release notes pages for the upcoming CentOS LiveCD 5.3: http://wiki.centos.org/Manuals/ReleaseNotes/CentOSLiveCD5.3 http://wiki.centos.org/Manuals/ReleaseNotes/CentOSLiveCD5.3/French The content is quite similar to the one from the CentOS LiveCD 5.2 except for these changes: - 5.2 -> 5.3 - file information (filename, size, md5sum, sha1sum) - some packages

On 11.05.2012, at 22:55, Bill Wendling wrote: > Hi all! > > Please remember to update the release notes! We're getting close to the release date, and we need the notes to be up-to-date. I added some bigger picture notes to http://llvm.org/docs/ReleaseNotes.html this morning, but we're still missing a lot of text, specifically: - clang: clang has it's own release notes