similar to: [LLVMdev] Iterator to enumerate machine operands

On 08/09/05, Chris Lattner <sabre at nondot.org> wrote: > This code isn't actually replacing the virtual register with a physreg. Then why changing its optype? It makes the assertion fails: MachineOperand& MO = inst.getOperand(n); if (MRegisterInfo::isVirtualRegister(MO.getReg())) { assert(MachineOperand::MO_VirtualRegister == MO.getType()); ... } Is that alright? Some

> > What do you want to improve exactly? Do you experience > problems? > not only iterator.h but also DataTypes.h I also put back iterator.h because at the trunk of llvm, iterator.h.in and iterator.h.cmake still there:( My improvement is now we didn't to generate DataTyes.h, we just need to generate config.h, And everything is configured at config.h, but not in seperate files.:)

>From: Paolo Invernizzi <arathorn at fastwebnet.it> >Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2004 10:20:39 +0200 > >I'm using scons to generate that files from .in files. I implemented in it >the configure check regarding iterators, hash and so on... >something like: > Hey, you've found the tool that makes it possible to generically reading Makefiles... Cool - The tool I've

Hi Yonggang! On Aug 27, 1:02 pm, 罗勇刚(Yonggang Luo) <luoyongg... at gmail.com> wrote: > Because this patch must be applied in one time so that don't broken > the buildbot system. > So I just submit the configure and cmake at the same time. > Also, this patch add two new file > iterator.h > and > DataTypes.h What do you want to improve exactly? Do you experience

Because this patch must be applied in one time so that don't broken the buildbot system. So I just submit the configure and cmake at the same time. Also, this patch add two new file iterator.h and DataTypes.h for the reason that patch doesn't support for svn's rename mechanics. So I just add these two file and doesn't delete the old history files Because I doesn't get

Hi, We recently created a Ruby on Rails POC, which landed us with a client. More about this initiative at http://www.articlesbase.com/information-technology-articles/cpal-a-ruby-on-rails-poc-1316554.html Thanks, Miti

On Wed, 7 Sep 2005, Tzu-Chien Chiu wrote: > I don't understand the following code snippet in LiveIntervalAnalysis.cpp. > > Why changing the type of the opreand from a virtual register to a > machine register? The register number (reg) is still a virtual > register index (>1024). This code isn't actually replacing the virtual register with a physreg. As you noticed, it

I don't understand the following code snippet in LiveIntervalAnalysis.cpp. Why changing the type of the opreand from a virtual register to a machine register? The register number (reg) is still a virtual register index (>1024). bool LiveIntervals::runOnMachineFunction(MachineFunction &fn) { // perform a final pass over the instructions and compute spill // weights, coalesce

Hi I'm trying to compile HowToUseJIT.cpp, but it seems that iterator definition is missing: --------------------Configuration: HowToUseJIT - Win32 Debug-------------------- Compiling... HowToUseJIT.cpp c:\sfu\usr\local\src\llvm\include\llvm\adt\ilist(41) : fatal error C1083: Cannot open include file: 'llvm/ADT/iterator': No such file or directory Error executing cl.exe. I've