similar to: [LLVMdev] 64-bit Linux Support

Hi, Bill - On Wed, Jun 01, 2005 at 10:33:39AM -0400, Bill Wendling wrote: > What's the plan for support on Linux 64-bit machines? Is that actively > being worked on right now or is there a roadmap for doing this? Do you mean compiling on 64-bit Linux or generating code for 64-bits? As you can see here: http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu/docs/GettingStarted.html#hardware

Hi Misha, On 6/1/05, Misha Brukman <brukman at uiuc.edu> wrote: > On Wed, Jun 01, 2005 at 10:33:39AM -0400, Bill Wendling wrote: > > What's the plan for support on Linux 64-bit machines? Is that actively > > being worked on right now or is there a roadmap for doing this? > > Do you mean compiling on 64-bit Linux or generating code for 64-bits? > I meant

On Wed, Jun 01, 2005 at 10:50:35AM -0400, Bill Wendling wrote: > It didn't look like there was a cftonend binary for the IA-64 > platform. Are we supposed to use the x86 binaries instead? The answer to that is that we don't have IA-64 in-house, so we don't provide an IA-64 C/C++ front-end, but if someone were to contribute it to us, we would gratefully host it. Note that if you

On Wed, 2005-06-01 at 10:04 -0500, Misha Brukman wrote: > On Wed, Jun 01, 2005 at 10:50:35AM -0400, Bill Wendling wrote: > > It didn't look like there was a cftonend binary for the IA-64 > > platform. Are we supposed to use the x86 binaries instead? > > The answer to that is that we don't have IA-64 in-house, so we don't > provide an IA-64 C/C++ front-end, but

in case you're interested in having llvm in debian sarge: it was removed today. I don't know why, but you might want to find out because sarge is in freeze phase for release next month. regards, -- Stefan Strasser

On Wed, Dec 29, 2004 at 08:13:21AM +0200, Alex Vinokur wrote: > Thank you for that information. I will wait until you get Cygwin > issues figured out. How can I know of that? Check out the link to the Cygwin nightly tester results here: http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu/testresults/ Wait until most of the asterisks in the test results go away. :) The tester runs nightly, so checking every few

On Wed, Dec 29, 2004 at 08:37:46AM +0200, Alex Vinokur wrote: > But it seems that there are no asterisks at > * http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu/testresults/ > * http://llvm.x10sys.com/testresults/Cygwin/ That's because there was a build error (see the big red notice). Check out http://llvm.x10sys.com/testresults/Cygwin/2004-12-27.html > By the way, is it possible to send a relevant

On Sat, May 14, 2005 at 02:18:26AM +0200, Stefan Strasser wrote: > in case you're interested in having llvm in debian sarge: it was > removed today. I don't know why, but you might want to find out > because sarge is in freeze phase for release next month. Possibly because of these: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?src=llvm I addressed the first one and fixed it in

On 4/19/06, Rogelio Serrano <rogelio.serrano at gmail.com> wrote: > On 4/16/06, Tanya Lattner <tonic at nondot.org> wrote: > > > > I've put the pre-release tar balls here: > > http://llvm.org/prereleases/1.7/ > > > > The build failed on i686-pc-linux-gnu. > > llvm[2]: Flexing FileLexer.l > llvm[2]: Compiling FileLexer.cpp for Release build

Misha Brukman wrote: > > On Wed, Dec 29, 2004 at 08:13:21AM +0200, Alex Vinokur wrote: > > Thank you for that information. I will wait until you get Cygwin > > issues figured out. How can I know of that? > > Check out the link to the Cygwin nightly tester results here: > > http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu/testresults/ > > Wait until most of the asterisks in the

> Changes in directory llvm-www/testresults: > > index.html updated: 1.22 -> 1.23 > --- [skiped] > <li><a href="http://npt.cc.rsu.ru/testresults-X86-FreeBSD/index.html">X86: > FreeBSD 5.3-RC1</a> -- debug build</li> > Can be description updated to "X86: FreeBSD 5.3 (Pentium 3 @ 1.0Ghz) ? Please! :) Vladimir

On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 7:42 AM, David Greene<dag at cray.com> wrote: > On Wednesday 15 July 2009 15:43, Török Edwin wrote: > >> How about starting simple, and just auto-tagging builds that work? >> Could be done per OS/arch, and one global tag when all buildbots pass. > > We've talked about this before and I've been working on setting up > such a system.

2009/7/16 Daniel Dunbar <daniel at zuster.org> > I plan to check my buildbot configuration "stuff" into the > llvm-project repository soon. I have to refactor things a bit to > support use by other people, but currently I have configurations for > llvm, clang, and llvm-gcc in various target / self-hosting > permutations. I also have a regular buildbot driver

Reid Spencer wrote: > > I have recently completed a build on Cygwin and am now hosting the > Cygwin nightly tester. Here's some things you should know: > > 1. LLVM 1.4 release won't build on Cygwin so you'll have to use the > latest CVS sources. > 2. Even if you build it on Cygwin, it probably won't work unless you > use the C Backend. See the test

I have recently completed a build on Cygwin and am now hosting the Cygwin nightly tester. Here's some things you should know: 1. LLVM 1.4 release won't build on Cygwin so you'll have to use the latest CVS sources. 2. Even if you build it on Cygwin, it probably won't work unless you use the C Backend. See the test results here: http://llvm.x10sys.com/testresults/Cygwin

On Fri, 20 Aug 2004 08:52:28 -0700 Reid Spencer <reid at x10sys.com> wrote: > Hi Jeff, > > On Fri, 2004-08-20 at 08:07, Jeff Cohen wrote: > > OK. I've built the front end without any heartaches, but I did > > encountered the following glitches: > > > > The documentation of --with-llvmgccdir is a bit ambiguous. I had to > > try several paths

Chris, What's the current status of the test suite. After putting everything in the llvm namespace and getting everything to link, I am getting only about 75% of the tests passing. Is this to be expected or have I broken something? Reid. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

hai,, cah u tell me what u mean by backend testing?how it is tested?i want a clear documentation for this,,, sukumaran -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20050727/748a41ed/attachment.html>

Hi, I was trying to know if LLVM 1.5 works better with VC++ 2003 and to what extent. This link: http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu/releases/1.5/ Referred to in : http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu/docs/ReleaseNotes.html Is broken Where can I find more information? In particular: Can the LLVM be compiled using VC++ 2003? Does it generate bytecode and executable code? Thanks

On Sat, Aug 21, 2004 at 04:15:49PM -0700, Jeff Cohen wrote: > I don't know if it's under cvs. It's the "getting started" page > (http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu/docs/GettingStarted.html) in section "Getting > Started Quickly (A Summary)". But careful reading of the remainder of > the page does give the correct path. http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu/docs/* is a copy of