similar to: [LLVMdev] preferred platform?

On Fri, 21 Jan 2005 12:14:41 -0800, Reid Spencer <reid at x10sys.com> wrote: > > Sorry for the sad state of the cygwin build. I had hoped to have it > cleaned up by now but many other things have been taking my time. > Although the build has been succeeding in recent days, I'm not sure it > will buy you anything. NONE of the nightly tests pass on cygwin. <ulp!>

Marshall Spight wrote: >>FYI, work progresses on the Win32 native port which you might also find >>interesting. It might even get done before the cygwin stuff. Jeff Cohen >>is working on that. Perhaps he can indicate the status of that effort. >> >> > >I recall reading on the llvm archives somewhere that there are significant >performance issues with the

Hi, I'm looking into LLVM, and I must say it looks supremely cool. However, I'm having a hard time getting anywhere with it, since I don't have a linux machine here, and cygwin seems like a bit of a second-class citizen. The instructions to build the cygwin binaries are outdated, so I have to just make some guesses as to what the right thing to do is, and I'm apparently not

>> In other words, abandoning overflow detection makes the >> duplication of types redundant, while requiring it would be a >> great burden on CPUs that don't have overflow exception hardware. > >Yes, you're right. This has been a desired change for quite some time >now. Unfortunately, its a huge impact to nearly every part of LLVM. We >will

Hi Marshall, LLVM *is* cool .. just not on cygwin! :) Sorry for the sad state of the cygwin build. I had hoped to have it cleaned up by now but many other things have been taking my time. Although the build has been succeeding in recent days, I'm not sure it will buy you anything. NONE of the nightly tests pass on cygwin. Until I can get some time to figure out why that is happening, I doubt

You know what I would really love? I set of pre-built llvm binaries. Either for Windows or RedHat. IIUC, the cygwin nightly build hasn't succeeded since March, and the latest download on illuvium.net predates that. I'd love to be able to try out 1.6, but having to build my own compiler to build it is a substantial barrier. I know there are binaries for the gcc frontend, which is cool, but

Asked a little while back about "coolest startups" using Rails, I think it''d have been better had I asked "coolest software." Besides the obvious (37Signals, Typo, Yakima Herald, Odeo, Measure Map, etc.), I''m just curious about other developments where people are using it to make nifty stuff. -- Giles Bowkett www.gilesgoatboy.org

Hi all... I have configure a Shorewall gateway to my little lan im my home. The shorewall work fine here... However, when I try to use Limewire, I can download nothing.... On fact, I can''t get any high connection on Limewire.. What can I do to make Limewire work properly behind a Shorewall gateway???? May be I have to open all port (both tcp and udp), but how? Thanks a lot... Best

OK, general question for the community -- what''s the coolest startup using Rails? I don''t think "37 Signals" is a fair answer. I''m curious as to what kind of other developments are happening. Are there a lot of startups using Rails in the first place? Or do most of you who are lucky enough to do Rails for a living (I''m coding Java, bleah) work in large

Hi, I run a small system with an older version of shorewall (1.4.2). It has been extremely solid for a long time. But recently I have noticed the connection table filling up, which has never happened before. My guess is that the box is getting hit with floods. The system only has 64M of ram and the conntrack_max is set to 4096 based on the ram. I have temporarily increased it to 8192 so that it

Hi, I have a simple question. I have my firewall with 2 external Ip and 1 lan. For example ISP1 FW LAN----Mail Server ISP2 Ok, when i DANT the smpt port to my mail server, I can see that the conection in my mail server comes from the external IP of my ISP. I need to change this so the conection to my mail server cames from the LAN IP from my firewall Is this possible?

Hi all and specially Mr. Tom.... (Please, do not be acid with me please! I am only a newbie, trying learn more about shorewall) I get involved with a Firewall Project in a customer here in my city... In this customer, he has two Internet Providers. So, he ask me how make certain connection following one routing path (like RT_1) and others connections type, following the other routing path

Hi all, I´m running a server that frecuently needs to open a pptp session with a remote server outside my Company. This server is running behind a Shorewall firewall and I don´t find information in Shorewall web page because there is no information in the link http://www.shorewall.net/PPTP.htm#ClientsBehind Nowadays I can connect this server with the remote one but te session is closed after

Hello - I am a little problem trying to find what dependency I need to up date - This is what I see when trying to install: rpm -Fvh shorewall-* error: Failed dependencies: rpmlib(PayloadIsLzma) <= 4.4.2-1 is needed by shorewall-common-4.2.0-0Beta3.noarch rpmlib(PayloadIsLzma) <= 4.4.2-1 is needed by shorewall-perl-4.2.0-0Beta3.noarch I am using Centos 5.2 with the following RPM

Hi, I have a few questions about the inner workings of netfilter (a graphical layout of my network setup @ https://aequorin.homeunix.net:62389/local/media/network-graph.png) 1) These are the syslog entries for some simple connection tests. Shorewall/netfilter has been set to record all stateful connections SSH is recognized as phys(eth0) -> $FW traffic. This is because PHYSIN is

Hi, Shorewall version -4.0.12-2 (EL5 rpm version) OS : Centos 5.2 I have shorewall successfully running on Linux with multi ISP. Trying to make services such as "rsync, ftp" go through my secondary ISP. For which I did the following eth0 : Internal LAN eth4 : DSL (Second ISP) => x.x eth5 : T1 (First ISP) => y.y Created the following entries in

Hi. I set, for example, a rule with a host server: Macro.http accept fw net:www.google.es I restart shorewall and it works, but when i stop the firewall for disabling Internet (for any reason), and i want start the firewall it says: Failed to start firewall : Compiling... Compiling /etc/shorewall/zones... Compiling /etc/shorewall/interfaces... WARNING: Support for the detectnets interface

Hi. I set, for example, a rule with a host server: Macro.http accept fw net:www.google.es I restart shorewall and it works, but when i stop the firewall for disabling Internet (for any reason), and i want start the firewall it says: Failed to start firewall : Compiling... Compiling /etc/shorewall/zones... Compiling /etc/shorewall/interfaces... WARNING: Support for the detectnets interface

And someone goes and redesigns the look and operation of the Trac. Quite noice, but a couple of comments: * The main toolbar ("Wiki", "Documentation", "Timeline") ends up under the puppet logo on the left hand side, which is a pest. * I can''t click on any link, text box, or button in the main part of the page. All of the navigation links work fine, and I