similar to: [LLVMdev] bug in Makefile?

Yes, it should. Thanks for noticing. John: could you fix this please? Jose M. Moya wrote: > shouldn't "make distclean" remove include/llvm/Config/config.h ? > > regards, > josem > > > _______________________________________________ > LLVM Developers mailing list > LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu >

# HG changeset patch # User Wei Liu <wei.liu2@citrix.com> # Date 1329922671 0 # Node ID bb2986677df84b9709a60aea7e70ffd9f9e23f76 # Parent d433a9cb0089683b8f75458807c5437341f2cdcc Add gtags target for xen/Makefile. Also update .hgignore. Signed-off-by: Wei Liu <wei.liu2@citrix.com> diff --git a/.hgignore b/.hgignore --- a/.hgignore +++ b/.hgignore @@ -23,6 +23,7 @@ ^\.config$ ^\.pc

How can I do function profiling and BB profiling with current llvm and llvm-gcc4? runtime/libprofile is disabled when using llvm-gcc4, but... is there any alternative to linking with libprofile_rt.so? How can I use llvm-prof? is utils/profile.pl obsolete? Thanks in advance, josem

Dear LLVM Developers, The LLVM website, CVS repository, and SAFECode website should now be back online. Should you encounter any problems with the LLVM services, please send email to llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu so that we may fix it. Regards, John T. Criswell ********************************************************************* * John T. Criswell Email: criswell at uiuc.edu

Dear Devang Patel, In response to your comment on bug 1868, how do I get BottomPass to requires Pass2 before Pass1? Is it by reversing the order of the calls to AU.addRequired()? -- John T. -- John T. Criswell jcriswel at bigw.org "It's today!" said Piglet. "My favorite day," said Pooh.

Might anyone have a FreeBSD binary or suggested modifications to the source to compile one? Thanks, Sean

Dear All, Do people think that they are ready to create the LLVM 1.6 release branch? I believe all the development is pretty much done. Is all the documentation in the LLVM source tree updated and ready? I'm not able to make a full doc review like I've been able to do in previous releases, so I need volunteers to work on the docs if they're not done yet. -- John T. -- John

Hello, Is PA working on the macintosh already? I am asking because I found this in the source code: /// Wants8ByteAlignment - FIXME: this is a complete hack for X86 right now. Thanks

OK, details: I run RH8 (gcc 3.2.something), RH9 (gcc 3.2.2-5) and Fedora. Problems are the same across all setups. Hardware is Athlon 1600+ and half a giga RAM. Runs fail with an assertion when the linear scan allocator is enabled, but runs without problems otherwise. On RH9 (the system I have access to while generating this email) I have the following details: > 1) The LLVM assembly

Hi, I have been looking into the code that generates the LLVM assembly in the LLVM front end, but I am not very sure if at the time that the llvm_c_expand_body_1 function is called, the SSA form was already constructed (each definition dominates all the uses). Can somebody please tell me? Thanks

Tanya Lattner wrote: > > Everything builds fine on sparc. The configure script needs to be fixed > though (see previous email). I'm not getting the error with the configure script (on Kain, anyway). I've tried it with --with-f2c and with f96 (NAG Fortran compiler) in and out of my $PATH. Can you verify that the configure script works for you without the --with-f2c option?

Dear All, For those of you who have write access to the LLVM CVS repository, I need to ask you to take more care when moving or renaming files. If done improperly, moving files can cause headaches when doing updates from the repository or merging revisions between branches (which is becoming more common with the vector_llvm branch). There are two ways that you can move a CVS file: 1) Use

John, Thanks for the information. That comment in the source code confused me and I wanted to be sure that the installation of all the LLVM framework in the macintosh for testing the pool allocation was not going to be done in vain. The LLVM documentation states that gcc 3.4x is necessary for compiling the LLVM. On the other hand, Xtools 1.5 for Mac includes only gcc 3.3 and Xtools 2.0 includes

Any reason not to upgrade to subversion? It does a much better job with handling moved or renamed files although svn doesn't actually store a 'move' or a 'rename' as a single versioned operation. Chris On 11/15/05, John Criswell <criswell at cs.uiuc.edu> wrote: > Dear All, > > For those of you who have write access to the LLVM CVS repository, I > need to

Hi, I want to check some properties of linux kernel with llvm, but I don't know how to compile a linux kernel to an llvm's .bc file. I have let llvm's gcc front-end ignore inline assembly by modifying cfrontend/src/gcc/llvm-expand.c, and replace CC/as/ar in the Makefile of the kernel with llvm-gcc/llvm-as/llvm-ar. However, the linux's "make" reports errors:

hi, when i change the OBJ_ROOT and recompile the llvm, it's successful. but run following test, then the error occues: ----------------------------------------------------- [yue at RH9 obj]$ make -C ./test/Programs make: Entering directory `/home/yue/llvm/obj/test/Programs' make[1]: Entering directory `/home/yue/llvm/obj/test/Programs/SingleSource' make[2]: Entering directory

Hi, It looks like the CVS server is still not available. When I try to update with cvs, I get: cvs [update aborted]: connect to llvm-cvs.cs.uiuc.edu(128.174.245.58):2401 failed: Connection refused I know the server was down earlier this week but according to the message below, its supposted to be restored by now. Could someone please help? Thanks, Reid. On Wed, 2004-01-07 at 14:30, John T.

Dear All, Our main server is back up, and all LLVM services (CVS, website, etc) should be up and available for use. If you notice that something is wrong, please send an email to llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu. Thanks! -- John T. -- ********************************************************************* * John T. Criswell Email: criswell at uiuc.edu * * Research Programmer

Cyrille Mescam wrote: > Morning, > > I would like to know if you received my mail with the assembly code > you wanted. > > It not, i'll send it again to you. > > Thanks for your help. > > Regards. > > Cyrille > I've looked into the files you sent me, and it seems that the problem is occuring due to the C library simplication pass (which is run

Dear All, Here is a more complete list of regressions for the platforms listed below. Some of the regressions from the previous list I emailed a few days ago have been fixed or were false positives. Thanks to all who've helped fix things. We would like to try to get as many of these fixed as possible before I create the release branch (still scheduled for tomorrow, Friday). I'll