similar to: [LLVMdev] windows

> Has anyone succeeded in building LLVM on windows? Yes, Chris Lattner has built it under Cygwin with gcc. -- gaeke at uiuc.edu

On Mon, 2004-09-13 at 22:38, Jeff Cohen wrote: > I don't know anything about Interix. > It may be best to defer a true Win32 port. It's not just the time it > would take to do it, it's the time to keep it up to date as LLVM > evolves. The Win32 port will constantly break, and I don't have the > time to keep fixing it. I've got my own time-consuming projects :)

Hi Reid, I'll send a complete report tommorow, its getting late. It looks like there is alot of work to do to get the MS VC version in line with the Unix release. I am very willing to help out with porting. The tests and regression tests look a biggy maybe they would be better done on the command line using make rather than separate Visual Studio projects. As I say I am willing to help

I would like to volunteer for the port of Interix and Win32 platforms, if no one objects against this. /Henrik --- Got Freedom? Software Freedom Day 2004 - 28th of August http://www.softwarefreedomday.org/ --- >From: Reid Spencer <reid at x10sys.com> >Reply-To: LLVM Developers Mailing List <llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu> >To: LLVMdev List <llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu>

Folks, With some MacOS help from Nate, I've begun the conversion of LLVM to use lib/System, the operating system independence layer. Currently, the library has implementations for three abstractions: Path, Program, and Signals. These provide some basic utilities for manipulating file system paths, finding and executing programs, and cleaning up after Signals. The implementations should work

Hi Reid, I downloaded the latest source code and ran configure (I suppose it was that you did mean). The result is: --------------- checking build system type... i586-pc-interix3 --------------- Otherwise, please correct me. /Henrik --- Got Freedom? Software Freedom Day 2004 - 28th of August http://www.softwarefreedomday.org/ --- >From: Reid Spencer <reid at x10sys.com>

Hello llvmdev, (just for fun) I've tried to compile LLVM under cygwin. With "make -k" I got only: ----------------- DynamicLinker.cpp: In function `void* GetAddressOfSymbol(const char*)': DynamicLinker.cpp:40: error: `RTLD_DEFAULT' undeclared (first use this function) DynamicLinker.cpp:40: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each

Dear All, I've finished building binaries for the GCC frontends and am now testing the 1.5 release branch on i386/Linux, Sparc/Solaris, and PowerPC/MacOS X. I'm looking for volunteers to test LLVM 1.5 on platforms that we don't have in house. I'm specifically looking for people who can do: Itanium FreeBSD/i386 Windows (Cygwin, MingW, etc) I'm mainly interested in major

Whamcloud and EMC are jointly investigating how to be able to contribute the Lustre client code into the upstream Linux kernel. As a prerequisite to this, EMC is working to clean up the Lustre client code to better match the kernel coding style, and one of the anticipated major obstacles to upstream kernel submission is the heavy use of code abstraction via libcfs for portability to other

Whamcloud and EMC are jointly investigating how to be able to contribute the Lustre client code into the upstream Linux kernel. As a prerequisite to this, EMC is working to clean up the Lustre client code to better match the kernel coding style, and one of the anticipated major obstacles to upstream kernel submission is the heavy use of code abstraction via libcfs for portability to other

On Tue, 17 May 2005, Jeff Cohen wrote: > I haven't specifically tried the 1.5 branch yet on FreeBSD, but the current > version just before you branched it passes gmake check and fails four > llvm-test tests: siod, SPASS, archie, and plot2fig. SPASS needs porting > work to compile correctly on FreeBSD. I haven't analyzed the other three > yet, but they weren't

Hi all, I've read with interest the threads of August about a win32 port (without cygwin), and as a joke yesterday I tried compiling LLVM on win32 with VC7.1, targeting the HowToUseJIT example... Well, apart from obvious problems, it went pretty well. I cannot reach the end of the process, but I'm feeling it's not too far. So the point is: Are you interested in taking in account

> Are you interested in taking in account the possibility that the LLVM > source code could be compiled with Microsoft compiler on windows? If you think it's not too far off, then we'd be happy to consider patches, insofar as they increase LLVM's C++ standards compliance. > Most of the problems are pretty trivial... for example: > > - A lot of .cpp lacked the

Is there an explicit document describing how to do LLVM with Cygwin? Or with Solaris Dev Express? And is LLVM considered a “safe” replacement for gcc on MacOS? In other words, if I’m doing some ObjC and C/C++ on the MacOS, if I drop LLVM in, is it going to create some strange kinds of heartache later on? Ted Neward Java, .NET, XML Services Consulting, Teaching, Speaking, Writing

> However, mmap() does provide some other small potential issues: > > 1) The mmap() function may not exist on all Unices, or it may work > differently on various versions of them. Definitely. We use mmap for a couple of different things. 1a) In lib/Bytecode/Reader we use mmap to read in bytecode files and archives. Certainly it would be trivial to rework this to fall back on

I haven't specifically tried the 1.5 branch yet on FreeBSD, but the current version just before you branched it passes gmake check and fails four llvm-test tests: siod, SPASS, archie, and plot2fig. SPASS needs porting work to compile correctly on FreeBSD. I haven't analyzed the other three yet, but they weren't failing two days earlier. John Criswell wrote: > Dear All, >

Hi, I would like to use LLVM-GCC to compare its performance with other compilers. Something like testsuite "Computing very large Fibonacci numbers" at http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.c%2B%2B.perfometer/37. My environment: ----------------- Windows 2000 Cygwin $ uname -srom CYGWIN_NT-5.0 1.5.11(0.116/4/2) i686 Cygwin ----------------- What do I have to download from

siod fails with gcc link errors: cannot find -ldl archie and plot2fig fail with gcc link errors: re_comp and re_exec are undefined Chris Lattner wrote: > On Tue, 17 May 2005, Jeff Cohen wrote: > >> I haven't specifically tried the 1.5 branch yet on FreeBSD, but the >> current version just before you branched it passes gmake check and >> fails four llvm-test tests:

Hi all, (Originally posted to r-help) I'm porting a package that I've worked on for OS X to Windows. The package is written in F95 so I need to compile it with gfortran and link it with gcc4. I've been trying to build an R with gcc4 without luck so far. If there is a binary of such a thing info would be appreciated. This package requires a Makefile. My question is, how can I find

Hi, Recently, I added some command line options to my pass like this: static llvm::cl::opt<MemMod> MemoryModel("mem-mod", llvm::cl::desc("Set the memory model:"), llvm::cl::values( clEnumVal(flat, "flat memory model"), clEnumVal(twodim, "two dimensional memory model"), clEnumValEnd)); This works