Displaying 20 results from an estimated 8000 matches similar to: "[LLVMdev] PowerPC Back End announcement"
2006 Feb 15
2
[LLVMdev] commerical usage
In addition, there are groups at STMicroelectronics and at Siemens
that have used or are considering using LLVM. Note that these are
internal development projects for now -- they (and Apple) have not
publicly announced products based on LLVM.
--Vikram
http://www.cs.uiuc.edu/~vadve
http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu/
On Feb 14, 2006, at 11:24 PM, Misha Brukman wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 15, 2006 at
2006 Feb 15
0
[LLVMdev] commerical usage
On Wed, Feb 15, 2006 at 02:53:05AM +0100, Jonas Gustavsson wrote:
> I have been looking at the LLVM project for quite a bit but I was
> wondering if there are any implication of using the project in a
> commercial enviroment in terms of licensing restrictions and other
> related issues, are there other people that use LLVM in a commecial
> enviroment?
LLVM's license is a
2005 Apr 21
0
[LLVMdev] Trailing whitespace removal (important for CVS users!)
On Thu, Apr 21, 2005 at 03:57:54PM -0500, Chris Lattner wrote:
> On Thu, 21 Apr 2005, Reid Spencer wrote:
> >Why not put all this into a pre-commit filter in CVS and be done with
> >it? We'd never be bothered with it again as it would never be
> >committed again.
>
> I'd rather not have CVS commit scripts mucking with the code.
I think Reid means to have a
2009 Jun 28
0
[LLVMdev] The document fault in llvm doc. And a comiling error
most html document need to add
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
int <head> section of html
such as
<head>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
other staff
</head>
this is the correct style.
.\llvm\docs\SourceLevelDebugging.html
Chris Lattner sabre at nondot.org
2005 Apr 21
5
[LLVMdev] Trailing whitespace removal (important for CVS users!)
Dear LLVMers,
If you live on the bleeding edge (i.e. CVS version), please read!
On Wed, Apr 20, 2005 at 12:12:54PM +0200, Markus F.X.J. Oberhumer wrote:
> Do you really want external patches for this ? A simple Perl script
> that runs on all *.h and *.cpp files, and a local commit from your
> side would be much simpler.
I'm in the process of doing just this as we speak. What this
2008 Dec 29
1
[LLVMdev] [Patch] Adding unit tests to LLVM
On Mon, Dec 29, 2008 at 1:57 PM, Misha Brukman <brukman at gmail.com> wrote:
> 2008/12/29 Talin <viridia at gmail.com>
>
>> Do the existing tests use a wildcard rule to gather all test sources? We
>> would need to insure that the wildcard rule for the unit tests and the large
>> tests are mutually exclusive.
>>
>
> By "large tests", I
2009 Feb 23
0
[LLVMdev] [llvm-commits] [llvm] r65296 - in /llvm/trunk: include/llvm/CodeGen/ lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/ lib/Target/CellSPU/ lib/Target/PowerPC/ lib/Target/X86/ test/CodeGen/X86/
On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 2:19 PM, Nate Begeman <natebegeman at me.com> wrote:
>
> On Feb 23, 2009, at 1:46 PM, Chris Lattner wrote:
>
> In my opinion, the proper direction for shuffles is:
>>
>> 1. Back out your patch.
>> 2. Move the functionality of "is splat" etc to method somewhere, e.g.
>> on SDNode.
>> 3. Introduce a new
2009 Feb 24
3
[LLVMdev] [llvm-commits] [llvm] r65296 - in /llvm/trunk: include/llvm/CodeGen/ lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/ lib/Target/CellSPU/ lib/Target/PowerPC/ lib/Target/X86/ test/CodeGen/X86/
On Feb 23, 2009, at 2:49 PM, Scott Michel wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 2:19 PM, Nate Begeman <natebegeman at me.com>
> wrote:
>
> On Feb 23, 2009, at 1:46 PM, Chris Lattner wrote:
>
> In my opinion, the proper direction for shuffles is:
>
> 1. Back out your patch.
> 2. Move the functionality of "is splat" etc to method somewhere, e.g.
> on
2005 Jun 03
1
[LLVMdev] Randomizing Functions & Global variables
Ms Brukman,
Thanks for your reply.Just clarifying my question.I actually wanted to randomize the static layout of function code in the executable file.Sorry for writing in confusing manner.
T
Misha Brukman <brukman at cs.uiuc.edu> wrote:
On Thu, Jun 02, 2005 at 02:12:22PM -0700, Tanu Sharma wrote:
> By randomization of functions I mean the manner in whch they are
> called , so
2004 Nov 08
0
[LLVMdev] I need some output and log files to trace down why mybuild fails
Hi Misha,
Files downloaded.
Thank you very much.
Henrik.
From: Misha Brukman <brukman at uiuc.edu>
Date: Mon, 8 Nov 2004 11:17:25 -0600
On Sat, Nov 06, 2004 at 09:35:47AM +0100, Henrik Bach wrote:
> Would some one be so kind to catch the output when configuring and
building
> the CFE together with the log files produced?
http://misha.brukman.net/code/llvm/logs/
The
2004 Aug 21
1
[LLVMdev] Can't get llvmg++ to work
On Sat, 21 Aug 2004 18:36:08 -0500
Misha Brukman <brukman at uiuc.edu> wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 21, 2004 at 04:15:49PM -0700, Jeff Cohen wrote:
> > I don't know if it's under cvs. It's the "getting started" page
> > (http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu/docs/GettingStarted.html) in section
> > "Getting Started Quickly (A Summary)". But careful reading
2005 Feb 18
1
[LLVMdev] questions about installing llvm
It works. Thanks!
However, although the configuration and installation process doesn't report
any error/warning, the llvmc cannot work. It just says: Unexpected unknown
exception occurred :(
Do you have any clue about that?
Feng
-----Original Message-----
From: Misha Brukman [mailto:brukman at uiuc.edu]
Sent: Thursday, February 17, 2005 2:00 PM
To: LLVM Developers Mailing List
Cc:
2004 Sep 24
1
[LLVMdev] Little win32/Signals.cpp patch
Sigh... take it up with Microsoft.
On Fri, 24 Sep 2004 12:06:36 -0500
Misha Brukman <brukman at uiuc.edu> wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 24, 2004 at 09:38:44AM -0700, Jeff Cohen wrote:
> > Here's the patch to Signals.cpp. assuming that stdio.h is acceptable
> > (can't imagine it won't work).
>
> We prefer #include <cstdio>, since this is C++ after all. :)
>
2009 Feb 24
1
[LLVMdev] [llvm-commits] [llvm] r65296 - in /llvm/trunk: include/llvm/CodeGen/ lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/ lib/Target/CellSPU/ lib/Target/PowerPC/ lib/Target/X86/ test/CodeGen/X86/
On Feb 23, 2009, at 10:30 PM, Scott Michel wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 8:26 PM, Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com>
> wrote:
>
> On Feb 23, 2009, at 6:13 PM, Scott Michel wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 4:03 PM, Nate Begeman <natebegeman at me.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> It's basically as Chris said; there will be a
2004 Oct 07
0
[LLVMdev] problem with lli (llvm 1.3)
On Thu, Oct 07, 2004 at 06:46:18PM -0400, Shukang Zhou wrote:
> Thanks Misha. I tried the "gcc -dM -E /tmp/file.c | grep __sparcv9"
> but there was no output. Maybe this is the probelm, I do have
>
> CXX = g++ -mcpu=v9
> CC := gcc -mcpu=v9
>
> in the Makefile.config. Do I need to add -m64 as well? Thanks.
Just run the test that I mentioned before:
> On Thu, 7
2005 Mar 16
2
[LLVMdev] Dynamic Creation of a simple program
Hi Misha,
Thanks for your answer
I was doing this:
========================
BasicBlock *BBlock = new BasicBlock("entry", MyFunc);
...
Value *Zero = ConstantSInt::get(Type::IntTy, 0);
Value *UZero = ConstantUInt::get(Type::UIntTy, 0);
MallocInst* mi = new MallocInst( STyStru );
mi->setName("tmp.0");
BBlock->getInstList().push_back( mi );
2004 Dec 21
3
[LLVMdev] Help with code
Constant *strcon==ConstantArray::get("Value : %d\n");
Sorry Typo.
On Tue, 21 Dec 2004, Misha Brukman wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 21, 2004 at 03:45:33PM -0700, Sriraman Tallam wrote:
> > I have this call instruction to printf inserted which is causing
> > an assertion failure. Any pointers to where I am wrong :
> >
> > Function
2004 Aug 21
0
[LLVMdev] Can't get llvmg++ to work
On Sat, Aug 21, 2004 at 04:15:49PM -0700, Jeff Cohen wrote:
> I don't know if it's under cvs. It's the "getting started" page
> (http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu/docs/GettingStarted.html) in section "Getting
> Started Quickly (A Summary)". But careful reading of the remainder of
> the page does give the correct path.
http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu/docs/* is a copy of
2009 Feb 24
0
[LLVMdev] [llvm-commits] [llvm] r65296 - in /llvm/trunk: include/llvm/CodeGen/ lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/ lib/Target/CellSPU/ lib/Target/PowerPC/ lib/Target/X86/ test/CodeGen/X86/
On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 4:03 PM, Nate Begeman <natebegeman at me.com> wrote:
>
> It's basically as Chris said; there will be a ShuffleVectorSDNode, and
> appropriate helper functions, node profile, and DAGCombiner support.
>
Fine. For vector shuffles. But again, what about vector constants, e.g.,
v4i32 <0, 1, 2, 3, 4>? BuildVectorSDNode is still a reasonable subclass
2004 Oct 07
1
[LLVMdev] problem with lli (llvm 1.3)
I'm sorry, I did not completely understand your email, let me clarify my
response.
On Thu, Oct 07, 2004 at 06:46:18PM -0400, Shukang Zhou wrote:
> Thanks Misha. I tried the "gcc -dM -E /tmp/file.c | grep __sparcv9"
> but there was no output. Maybe this is the probelm, I do have
>
> CXX = g++ -mcpu=v9
> CC := gcc -mcpu=v9
>
> in the Makefile.config. Do I need