similar to: [LLVMdev] JFYI: svn 1.0.1 released

Hi all, web-browser access to cvs is of course nice, but is it possible to provide anonymous read-only access to llvm cvs? (it would be nice to have an ability just download last sources) P.S. BTW, this and previous my post were actually motivated by desire to find some simple example on JIT usage :) --- Valery A.Khamenya

Hi all, compilation of package llvm-1.0.tar.gz under redhat 9 is failed with following output: ------- make[3]: *** No rule to make target `/home/vak/llvm/llvm/runtime/GCCLibraries/crtend/BytecodeObj/C++-Exception.bc', needed by `/home/vak/llvm/llvm/lib/BytecodeLibs/libcrtend.bc'. Stop. make[3]: Leaving directory `/home/vak/llvm/llvm/runtime/GCCLibraries/crtend' ...skipped -------

Hi OpenC++ developers, IMHO, the LLVM project (http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu/) could give a second breath to OpenC++ project. Indeed, the implementations of reflection become quite restricted if the just-in-time (JIT) compiling is not available. Am i wrong? --- Valery A.Khamenya

> > hm, sending bug report is not my favorite hobby :) > > Well if you don't, it might never get fixed :( OK-OK, let's save the world :) Well, I've made it. > It might be possible to hack your <cassert> header file or something > though... it is just a few places in three files as reported in my previous post. Then comes assert violation with message from

I''m trying to install a plugin using the supplied command... $ script/plugin install svn://rubyforge.org//var/svn/backgroundrb I get an error sh: line 1: svn: command not found What am I doing wrong? What is svn, and why is it not found?? It seems to work for everyone else.... Have I missed something in my Ruby install? -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

Devang removed the old llvm/tools/lto directory and renamed lto2 -> lto. The end result of this is that 'svn up' may complain. If you get an error about this from svn, just do: $ rm -rf llvm/tools/lto* $ svn up llvm/tools to fix it, -Chris

I have experienced this with a svn 1.5 client but not with 1.4.6. Did anybody see this with a 1.4.6 (or older) client? Btw. what is the server version? Anyway this seems to be a bug in subversion. Cheers, Gabor PS: http://subversion.tigris.org/servlets/ReadMsg?list=users&msgNo=79361 On Jul 1, 5:27 am, Chris Lattner <clatt... at apple.com> wrote: > Devang removed the old

Hi all there is a lot of changes/bugfixes as it was reported by Chris. Would it be possible to put new tarballs for last stable release? --- Valery A.Khamenya

Hi devels, "install-instructionsSection" seems to be absent: http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu/releases/1.2/docs/ReleaseNotes.html#install-instructions best regards, --- Valery A.Khamenya

thanks! --- Valery A.Khamenya

> My $0.02 worth on this topic .. and again |0.02 of mein :-) > However, I find it unreasonable to expect LLVM to provide > any features in this area. In order to do anything meaningful, > LLVM would have to have some kind of awareness of networks > (typically an operating system concern). > That seems at odds with the "low level" principles of LLVM. When I

Hi devels, there are two issues concerning invoking optimizations: 1. this document: http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu/docs/GettingStarted.html is very nice, it would be good though to add in a section An Example Using the LLVM Tool Chain examples on optimization step. 2. If i am not wrong there is no tool, which integrates all steps: llvmgcc->opt->llc into something like llcc (and

Hi Chris and all, > LLVM itself doesn't. The files that live in the llvm/runtime directory > are runtime libraries for the C/C++ front-end. If you're not using those > front-ends, then you don't need to build them. I see. Anyway, it would be nice to have a few words about building/installing llvm and cfrontend. I fail to find notes on this matter in README or INSTALL

Hi, are there any attempts to use LLVM in graph-rewriting (term-rewriting) language implementations? How good is LLVM for this? E.g., is it natural to expect that the LLVM-based implementation of the language Concurrent Clean be any faster than its reference implementation? Best regards -- Valery A.Khamenya -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

> > yesterday I got new SuSE 9.1 DVD, so i am going to enter this > > river again. Perhaps, this time all will be fine. > > Sounds great, please let me know how it goes. SuSE 9.1 is running OK. after 30 minute of compilation i get first errors: ********************* make[2]: Leaving directory `/pool/tmp/llvm/runtime/libtrace' make[2]: Entering directory

> This is fixed in CVS. You might consider upgrading to LLVM CVS, > especially if you are interested in looking at performance issues: several > important performance related patches have gone in since LLVM 1.2. OK, now i've really upgraded to CVS, but it looks like state of sources is "not compilable" :( indeed: *************************** Linking llc release executable

Hi, due the fact that some peoples on the list looks interested to nginx i will tell you that there is a wiki out there: http://wiki.codemongers.com/ Regards Alex

> Unfortunately, without your help, we won't be able to fix this (none of us > have a SuSE box). OK-OK, I will be a SuSE-batman for a while :) > Can you provide some patches? :) I do believe that the right way here is to provide some patches to newest gcc instead. If it fails, then let's polute nice llvm sources. I am waiting for feedback from SuSE team. have a nice day!

Hi all, some note i.r.t. the problem. it looks like, ICE while compiling llvm under SUSE 9.0 is caused by: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12544 which is bug present in gcc 3.3.1 (from SUSE 9) This bug is fixed in 3.3.2 I don't know why SUSE team still denies to provide us with gcc 3.3.2 under SUSE 9 Hm, for suse 7.3 new gcc is already provided about a

> Fixed, the real link should go to the Getting Started Guide. Chris, now link is broken at all :) remove "Guide" in "GettingStartedGuide.html" to have: "GettingStarted.html"