llvm dev - Nov 2003 - [LLVMdev] llvm 1.0, g++, SuSE 9, internal compiler error

> > hm, sending bug report is not my favorite hobby :)
> 
> Well if you don't, it might never get fixed :(
OK-OK, let's save the world :)
Well, I've made it.
 
> It might be possible to hack your <cassert> header file or something
> though...
it is just a few places in three files as reported in my previous post. Then
comes assert violation with message from llvm sources.

regards,
--
vak

On Thu, 13 Nov 2003, [koi8-r] "Valery A.Khamenya[koi8-r] " 
wrote:
> > It might be possible to hack your <cassert> header file or
something
> > though...
>
> it is just a few places in three files as reported in my previous post.
Then comes assert violation with message from llvm sources.
Unfortunately, without your help, we won't be able to fix this (none of us
have a SuSE box).  Can you provide some patches?  :)

-Chris

-- 
http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu/
http://www.nondot.org/~sabre/Projects/

Forgive me because I've only been following the messages in a very cursory 
fashion, so this may already have been covered.  I'm running fine on Red 
Hat 9.0.  Maybe this should be an issue for SuSE?

-- Robert.

At 02:14 PM 11/13/2003 -0600, Chris Lattner wrote:
>On Thu, 13 Nov 2003, [koi8-r] "Valery A.Khamenya[koi8-r] "  wrote:
> > > It might be possible to hack your <cassert> header file or
something
> > > though...
> >
> > it is just a few places in three files as reported in my previous
post.
> Then comes assert violation with message from llvm sources.
>
>Unfortunately, without your help, we won't be able to fix this (none of
us
>have a SuSE box).  Can you provide some patches?  :)
>
>-Chris
>
>--
>http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu/
>http://www.nondot.org/~sabre/Projects/
>
>_______________________________________________
>LLVM Developers mailing list
>LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu         http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
>http://mail.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev
Robert Mykland     Voice: (831) 462-6725

> Forgive me because I've only been following the messages in a very
cursory
> fashion, so this may already have been covered.  I'm running fine on
Red
> Hat 9.0.  Maybe this should be an issue for SuSE?
SuSE was brave enough to put the newer version of gcc in the SuSE 9 package.
RedHat 9 has simply older gcc version :)

> Unfortunately, without your help, we won't be able to fix this (none of
us
> have a SuSE box).  
OK-OK, I will be a SuSE-batman for a while :)
> Can you provide some patches?  :)
I do believe that the right way here is to provide some patches to newest gcc
instead. If it fails, then let's polute nice llvm sources.

I am waiting for feedback from SuSE team.

have a nice day!
--
vak