similar to: [LLVMdev] this code won't assemble on sparc

Hello. I have been trying to check, how llvm works on Solaris recently. First I have tested lli, whitch seems to execute the bytecode generated on Linux without any problems. However, llc has failed to generate valid SPARC assembler code even on the helloworld example. Here is the generated code: sakharov at trillian:~$ cat ./test.s .text .align 16 .globl main

configure fails with : configure: error: Unsupported off_t type I am not too sure what off_t is needed but this is a pretty standard thing. My configure line : ./configure --build=i386-pc-solaris2.10 --host=i386-pc-solaris2.10 --prefix=/opt/csw --with-zlib --with-ssl=openssl --with-storages=mbox,maildir --with-libiconv-prefix=/opt/csw Yes, the openssl libs are in /opt/csw/lib Not sure what

Hi all, I have trouble to compile Matrix packages on Solar10 x86-64 with Sun compilers. I saw some postings on this but am not sure how to solve this problem. It is becoming critical as I cannot install biocLite() because of its dependency on Matrix. Could you direct me how to resolve the issue? Thanks in advance! Dongseok R version 2.8.1 (2008-12-22) Copyright (C) 2008 The R Foundation for

System details: -------------- Sun Blade 1000, Solaris 8, Sun ONE Compiler Suite (rebranded Forte 7), R versions 1.6.0 and 1.6.2 - suspect others are affected, too Problem description: ------------------- Using the recommended env var setting from p.15 of the Admin Guide, the configure script fails the sgemm sunperf test, even though the sunperf libraries are available Not linking with

R Help List: Just curious if anyone has successfully built R on a SPARC platform running Sun Solaris 10 using the latest Sun Studio 12 set of compilers. If so, I would be interested in the compile flags that you used. I have tried several different builds of version 2.5.1, 2.6.0, and 2.6.1 using various different compile flags and I am able to compile and check, but for whatever reason, the

Hi, I have problems compiling speex 1.2rc1: > /opt/studio/SOS11/SUNWspro/bin/cc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. - > I.. -I../include -I../include -I.. -I/opt/csw/include -I/opt/csw/ > include -xO3 -xarch=v8 -I/opt/csw/include -c skeleton.c > /bin/bash ../libtool --mode=link /opt/studio/SOS11/SUNWspro/bin/cc - > xO3 -xarch=v8 -I/opt/csw/include -xarch=v8 -L/opt/csw/lib -o

Apologies if this is not the best list on which to ask for help. I have compiled R 2.6.0 using Sun Studio 12 compilers. I can install most CRAN and bioconductor packages that I need, with the exception of RSQLite. Unfortunately this is critical for other packages that I need. I have tried to compile it using R CMD INSTALL to generate a config.log file. I don't know how to fix the reported

Hi, I am trying to compile R 1.9.1 and 2.0.0 on Solaris 2.8 with Sun Studio Fortran 95 compiler but I have obtained some errors which I enclose. I have compiled R with g77 GNU compiler and it was OK. Does anyone know if R 2.0.0 has been successfully built on Solaris 2.8 with Sun Studio Fortran 95 compiler? or at least, How could I achieve this? The R installation manual does not have any

Hi! I'm trying to compile R (32-bit) on Solaris 10 x86 using Sun Studio 10 + Sun Perflib (for BLAS and LAPACK) but encountered issues with undefined symbol "bratio". Appreciate any help. Compiler options (from configure output): ============================================== R is now configured for i386-pc-solaris2.10 Source directory: . Installation directory:

I am trying to compile R-2.4.1 in 64-bit on Solaris 10 running on AMD hardware. I am trying to do this with Sun Studio 11. My config.site looks like this: #! /bin/sh AR="/usr/ccs/bin/ar" TEX="/usr/local/teTeX/bin/i386-pc-solaris2.10/tex" LATEX="/usr/local/teTeX/bin/i386-pc-solaris2.10/latex" PDFTEX="/usr/local/teTeX/bin/i386-pc-solaris2.10/pdftex"

I am trying to compile R-2.4.1 in 64-bit on Solaris 10 running on AMD hardware. I am trying to do this with Sun Studio 11. My config.site looks like this: #! /bin/sh AR="/usr/ccs/bin/ar" TEX="/usr/local/teTeX/bin/i386-pc-solaris2.10/tex" LATEX="/usr/local/teTeX/bin/i386-pc-solaris2.10/latex" PDFTEX="/usr/local/teTeX/bin/i386-pc-solaris2.10/pdftex"

Hello, I tried to compile v2.3.1 on Solaris x86 with SUN Pro compilers. I had an error while stats libarary was being compiled and I notice that "-xtarget=generic64" was not passed to f95 while cc used it. Could you tell me how to fix this problem? f95 -PIC -O -I/mounts/devel/SUNWspro/prod/include -c sgram.f -o sgram.o f95 -PIC -O -I/mounts/devel/SUNWspro/prod/include -c

I've installed hdf5 [library & includes] here locally, last week. [see ?hdf5save in R] There is a remaining compilation / linking problem for me: The hdf5 library uses "compress2" a routine defined in Gnu's zlib, but not available in the zlib that comes with X11R6.3 (which we have installed). Now unfortunately, the final link statement for R (0.65) [for me, with hdf5

Hello, Apologies for the post here. I have read the R-Admin (learned a lot!) and searched the web for days, but still fail at compiling R on my Ultra 20 running solaris 10 x86 1/06. This is the tail of './configure' output: ..... checking for dlopen in -ldl... yes checking readline/history.h usability... no checking readline/history.h presence... no checking for readline/history.h... no

Dear all, I am trying to compile R-1.8.0 and R-1.8.1-beta (as 19-11-2003) under Solaris 9 using the Sun compilers. './configure' fails; the last lines of the display are: checking whether we can compute C Make dependencies... yes, using cc -M checking whether cc supports -c -o FILE.lo... yes checking how to get verbose linking output from f77... -v checking for Fortran 77 libraries...

Hi Jean-Marc, Am 17.04.2009 um 13:35 schrieb Jean-Marc Valin: > It should be using getopt1.c when getopt isn't available.c. Can you > check why it doesn't? In any case, that's only required for the Ogg > tools, not for the library. config.log says ac_cv_func_getopt_long=no ac_cv_header_getopt_h=no ac_cv_lib_gnugetopt_getopt_long=no LIBOBJS='

Hmnnn... This is the third version of R I have installed and I am stumped on this one. There is some unresolved external I cannot find... /opt/SUNWspro/bin/cc -v -o R.bin CConverters.o Rdynload.o RNG.o apply.o arithmetic.o array.o attrib.o bind.o builtin.o character.o coerce.o colors.o complex.o connections.o context.o cov.o cum.o dcf.o datetime.o debug.o devPS.o devPicTeX.o deparse.o

I have a question about how one can modify or override the compilers that R uses for package installations? Or if perhaps this configuration is in some editable file somewhere. Initially I built the version of R 2.15.1 on Solaris SPARC (virtual T4), but found out the build was done as 32 bit. After some research, I found that the pre-compiled GCC version I had only allowed for 32 bit. I wanted

Hi, I'm having trouble compiling R-2.10.0 (R-patched_2009-11-02.tar.gz) on solaris 10 and am hoping for some advice. I'm getting errors about having the wrong version of lib_I_dbg_gen.so.1 ("version `DBG_GEN_5.1' not found"), when it gets to the step of compiling recommended packages (cluster). I think we do have the right version of lib_I_dbg_gen.so.1 on the

Hi, The attached code produces errors (as it should) with the command llvmgcc -c -S timeLLVMfft.c but it also creates output in the file timeLLVMfft.s. Maybe this is the intended behavior for llvmgcc, but it seems unconventional to me... - Nick -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: timeLLVMfft.c.tgz Type: application/octet-stream Size: 829