similar to: [LLVMdev] lli should not put .bc in argv[0]

Hi Prakash, Unfortunately it looks like you need to do quite a bit of investigation into this. However, I hope I can provide some useful tips. 1. In general, lli and llc generate exact the same code except lli default to static codegen while llc defaults to dynamic-no-pic codegen. So try passing -relocation-model=dynamic-no-pic to lli. If this works, that means there are issues with

Hi Eli, Thanks for the reply. I tried with -Xlinker="-ldl ". However it does not seem to make a difference. It seems that when bugpoint is run with --run-jit, the linker args are not passed to gcc (from tools/bugpoint/ExecutionDriver.cpp) : if (InterpreterSel == RunLLC || InterpreterSel == RunCBE || InterpreterSel == CBE_bug || InterpreterSel == LLC_Safe) RetVal =

I've filed PR3043 for this. Evan On Nov 3, 2008, at 4:00 PM, Prakash Prabhu wrote: > Hi Evan, > > Thanks for the pointers. We found a simple test case that causes the > problem (thanks to Tom in my group): > > #include<stdio.h> > #include<stdlib.h> > > void test(); > void (*funcPtr)(); > > int main(int argc, char **argv) { > funcPtr =

Clarify BugDriver.cpp:BugDriver::ParseInputFile()'s return values in its explanatory comment. Committed as an obvious fix. -- gaeke at uiuc.edu Index: BugDriver.cpp =================================================================== RCS file: /home/vadve/vadve/Research/DynOpt/CVSRepository/llvm/tools/bugpoint/BugDriver.cpp,v retrieving revision 1.6 diff -u -a -d -p -r1.6 BugDriver.cpp ---

Hi Evan, Thanks for the pointers. We found a simple test case that causes the problem (thanks to Tom in my group): #include<stdio.h> #include<stdlib.h> void test(); void (*funcPtr)(); int main(int argc, char **argv) { funcPtr = test; test(); } void test() { if(funcPtr == test) { printf("OK!\n"); } else { fprintf(stderr, "Bad!\n"); exit(1);

gccld would barf if you tried to specify the full pathname of an archive on the command line to gcc, (e.g., instead of gcc ... -L/full/path/to -lFOO you say gcc ... /full/path/to/libFOO.a) which many GNU Makefiles try to do. This patch fixes that. Ok to commit? -- gaeke at uiuc.edu gccld.cpp: Fix typo in header. Add IsArchive static method. Roll LoadLibraryFromDirectory() into

On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 12:17 PM, Prakash Prabhu <prakash.prabhu at gmail.com> wrote: > Generating reference output from raw program: <cbe><gcc> > Error running tool: [snip] > /tmp/cc08IpX8.o: In function `SyLoadModule': > bugpoint-test-program.bc.cbe.c:(.text+0x25705): undefined reference to > `dlopen' [snip] This is saying that compilation with CBE is

Hi, I have a program that runs when statically compiled using llc and gcc but crashes with a segmentation fault when run with lli. I am trying to debug it with bugpoint and the initial part of bugpoint seems to be suggesting that I am somehow missing the linking with the libraries having dlsym/dlopen although I am passing it to lli : *$ bugpoint -run-jit

Hi, I am mounting an NT share from a linux(RH6.0) box using smbmount (samba v2.05a). smbmount //machine/cvsrepository /home/user/cvsrepository -U user I am trying to delete a read-only file in the mounted directory. The directory has proper write permissions: cd /home/user/cvsrepository mkdir blah cd blah chmod +w . touch test chmod -w test rm test rm: remove write-protected file `test'? y

Hi, I am trying to parallize the lli interpreter (code: http://pastebin.com/6iuHNH3Q). I am using ubuntu 12.04 with llvm version 3.1. Each thread uses a seperate LLVMContext, however the interpreter continues to crash. Error msg: ..../include/llvm/Support/Mutex.h:116: bool llvm::sys::SmartMutex<true>::release(): Assertion `((recursive && acquired) || (acquired == 1)) &&

I'm in the position where I'd like to offer IMAP access to a collection of email accounts which are stored in a very odd manner. Files are stored as: /blah/$dd-$mm-$yy/$domain/1234/1234 For example: /reject/12-3-2009/cvsrepository.org/35199/35199639 There is a single file for each mail, which I guess technically probably counts as an mbox folder, but only just. I

HI R users, I construct dendrogram tree and cut the tree into different clusters, then generate survival curves by the following three functions. All variables are included in an inputfile. Can you help me to consolidate the following three function into one functions? I thought about using if else function, but not sure how to do it. Thank you, Ding # function to generate RFS RFS2cluster

Hai Mourik Jan, ? This is the script we use, this is the work my collega. ( see the developed by, thats his company?) This is a "as is"? share, so read the code, we added as much as possible info in there. ? Few extra pointers, - speed up the script by useing ramdisk, make sure your ramdisk has the space for the bigest pdf you want to create. ??? we did limit the max size in the

FAQ 7.22 You must print a ggplot object, for example with print(m52.2cluster) For the FAQ, run the line system.file("../../doc/FAQ") in R on your computer. Open up the resulting filepath in your favorite editor and scroll down to 7.22 On Sun, Jan 14, 2018 at 4:21 PM, Ding, Yuan Chun <ycding at coh.org> wrote: > Hi Bert, > > I am sorry to bother you on weekend. >

That is certainly OK, but you can also just use print(ggsurvplot(...)) as your final statement. out <- RFS( ...) would then return the ggsurvplot object *and* graph it. Any good R tutorial or a web search will provide more details on function returns, which you might find useful. Cheers, Bert Bert Gunter "The trouble with having an open mind is that people keep coming along and

Hi Bert, Thank you, yes, you are right. I want to consolidate the three functions into one functions by adding more arguments, adding flexibility to accommodate the number of clusters or the number of Kaplan Meier curves generated in one figure. So, I just need to define one function. Thanks, Ding From: Bert Gunter [mailto:bgunter.4567 at gmail.com] Sent: Sunday, January 14, 2018 9:50 AM

Thank you, your suggestion is simpler and logically better. I had impression that the last object in a function gets returned, so I did not add the print function at the bottom line of the function definition. Returning an object and graph the object are different process, I am a beginner for writing R function and need to find a good guide source about writing R functions. If you know a good

Hi Bert, I am sorry to bother you on weekend. I am still struggling on defining a correct function. I first defined the function RFS (see below), then run it by provide the two argument. m52.2cluster <-RFS(inputfile =allinfo_m52, N=2 ) I do not get error message, but no figure displays on screen. I do not know what is going on. Can you help me a little more on this issue? Thank you,

Hi Richard, Thank you so much!! I understand the problem now, I assign a name to the "ggsurvplot" object and then add print(fig) at bottom of function definition, now figure gets printed on screen. Ding # function to generate RFS curves RFS <- function( inputfile, N ) { cluster<- survfit(Surv(RFS_days2, OV_Had_a_Recurrence_CODE) ~ clusters, data =

Hello, I'm trying to use DWARF informations to debug JITed code, but lli crashes when it tries to run any code coming from llvm-gcc or CLANG with the -g and -emit-llvm -c arguments. The target machine is an AMD 64 X2 processor on linux ubuntu 9.04 in x86_64 mode. Lli is generated from the current version of the svn repository. The backtrace and full bt from gdb are enclosed with this