similar to: Windows CodeBlocks opus use

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 30000 matches similar to: "Windows CodeBlocks opus use"

2011 Feb 23
1
wine & codeblocks
Hi, I'm using wine-1.3.12 with Fedora 14 Trying to use codeblocks 10.05, install is ok, running ok. Open a new empty file, write some lines in editor, select lines and copy, when i try to paste lines selected is result a crash of codeblocks. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- [code] Reparsing while typing for editor
2016 Jan 09
0
Issue with decoding 8-bit PCM data
Hello Benjamin, The original WAV file I have is linear 8-bit PCM. I want to ensure that original linear formats are kept as is. Later I will add support for ulaw. Regards Amit On Fri, Jan 8, 2016 at 5:34 PM, Benjamin Schwartz < benjamin.m.schwartz at gmail.com> wrote: > Do you really need linear 8-bit PCM or do you want ulaw? Linear 8-bit is > ... pretty rare. > > On Thu,
2012 Jul 12
2
Help Installing Codeblocks on Centos 6.4
To whom this may concern I have read the read me file provided by the OS. I followed the directions but I can not install Codeblocks from source code. The terminal tells me that the files are not in my home folder. Whe I check I see the folders. I don't know what to do. Thank you for your time. Sincerley Patrick Kongawi
2016 Jan 07
3
Issue with decoding 8-bit PCM data
Hello Ralph, > Likewise opus_encode() takes 16 bit samples, so you need to extend each > sample from an 8 bit source before encoding. Two questions 1. In opusenc.c which API does the extending the 8-bit to 16-bit? 2. If that is the case then how will 24 bit PCM sample work? Regards Amit On Thu, Jan 7, 2016 at 12:21 PM, Ralph Giles <giles at thaumas.net> wrote: > On 07/01/16
2013 May 27
1
Empty buffer on encoder write byte
Hi, I've been trying to encode a live audio input from the microphone on iOS device using opus. Uncompressed audio recording works fine with http://theamazingaudioengine.com/ Then, when I tried to do encoding, I'm stuck at figuring out why the buffer is empty: static int ec_write_byte(ec_enc *_this,unsigned _value){ if(_this->offs+_this->end_offs>=_this->storage)return
2013 Jul 04
1
Hardware design of an Opus IP
Hi everybody, I was wondering if there would be interest in having a hardware IP implementing Opus (hardware as in VHDL/Verilog description)? Does that make sense? Several companies that seem to have an interest in Opus (such as Skype, Mozilla, Broadcom, Orange, Huawei) could thus have a dedicated, efficient, low-power solution for phones and tablets. As LTE is being deployed en masse, it
2012 Aug 25
1
Why does opus scale down frequency from 22k to 20k ?
Why does opus scale down frequency from 22k to 20k ? 64kbps<https://lh5.googleusercontent.com/-DGsEd1ijTBs/UDE3OFVrE5I/AAAAAAAADBo/bFcWQ6I4-Zk/s588/opus_64_test.png> 128kbps<https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-3Wfvq6OPGRw/UDE3OClxEdI/AAAAAAAADBk/vsBJ9Gcd_pU/s589/opus_test.png>
2018 Nov 01
0
Possible bug in Opus 1.3 (opus-tools-0.2-opus-1.3)?
(Please wrap your lines.) On Oct 26 01:38:34, Ulrich.Windl at rz.uni-regensburg.de wrote: > Playing with Opus 1.3 I converted a tone sweep with a sample rate of 96kHz (just for fun). Before I had converted that from WAV to FLAC, and to Vorbis without problems. Can you please post the original wav? I am not sure what Audacity means by a logarithmisch sweep. Is that a fixed number of Hertz per
2013 Nov 10
3
Questions Regarding Opus Test Vectors
Benjamin, Thanks for the prompt response. Are there other recommended methods to verify encoder implementations? Regards, Chris From: benjamin.m.schwartz at gmail.com [mailto:benjamin.m.schwartz at gmail.com] On Behalf Of Benjamin Schwartz Sent: Sunday, November 10, 2013 1:53 PM To: Wang, Chris Cc: opus at xiph.org Subject: Re: [opus] Questions Regarding Opus Test Vectors On Sun, Nov 10,
2013 Oct 05
1
OPUS implementation with FPGA
Just to make sure, what's the goal here? Is the goal 1) to have a fast Opus implementation or are you 2) looking for an interesting FPGA implementation project? If 1), then an FPGA is most likely not necessary since Opus is not computationally expensive. If 2), then it depends on the desired size of the project and the desired quality. The simplest encoder possible is indeed simpler than the
2014 Jan 17
4
Opus in WebM
Yes, it's basically an intrinsic aspect of the mathematics. If you seek into the middle of an Opus stream, that's about how long it takes before the audio converges to be correct. On Jan 17, 2014 2:13 PM, "Brendan Bolles" <brendan at fnordware.com> wrote: > On Jan 7, 2014, at 11:11 AM, Brendan Bolles wrote: > > > The closest thing to a standards document for
2014 Jan 21
1
Opus in WebM
It does not; Vorbis needs only lap consecutive frames, and the timing was constructed so that the 'timestamp' of a vorbis frame actually points to the middle of the frame data. When you combine a starting frame with the subsequent frame, the data you get back is from the starting timestamp forward. Because Opus needs to preroll a larger amount, that trick wouldn't work with Opus.
2013 Nov 10
2
Questions Regarding Opus Test Vectors
I downloaded test vectors from opus-codec.org site. The site indicated that the test files are intended for verifying that the Opus decoders are operating properly. I assume I could also use them to verify my encoder implementation, right? For example, use testvector01.dec as input to my encoder and compare its output bitstream with the corresponding testvector01.bit bitstream file. Any idea
2018 Nov 05
0
Antw: Re: Antw: Re: Possible bug in Opus 1.3
On Nov 05 18:00:06, hans at stare.cz wrote: > On Nov 05 11:32:49, hans at stare.cz wrote: > > On Nov 05 11:05:34, hans at stare.cz wrote: > > > > Did you also try to listen at the beginning, shortly before the real tone appears in the audible spectrum? While significantly larger, Opus had produced significant ghost noise (much less than Vorbis did)... > > I experience
2018 Nov 06
0
Antw: Re: Antw: Re: Antw: Re: Possible bug in Opus 1.3
>>> Jan Stary <hans at stare.cz> schrieb am 05.11.2018 um 18:00 in Nachricht <20181105170002.GA72174 at www.stare.cz>: > On Nov 05 11:32:49, hans at stare.cz wrote: >> On Nov 05 11:05:34, hans at stare.cz wrote: >> > > Did you also try to listen at the beginning, shortly before the real tone > appears in the audible spectrum? While significantly
2013 Dec 15
0
Real hardware for opus
The vast majority of audio players do *not* have special hardware for MP3 and Vorbis. Decoding audio is so cheap that there's no reason to bother with the trouble of having a dedicated hardware for it. Jean-Marc On 15/12/13 07:25 AM, Carsten Mattner wrote: > vorbis, mpeg1 layer 3 and more have special hardware support in > audio players widely available but I can't find anything
2007 Oct 29
1
[Bug] Codeblock in _second_ line
Take the following input and both `Markdown.pl` and PHP Markdown will fail: ~~~Input~~~~~~ Codeblock ~~~End~~~~~~~ ~~~Expected~~~~ <pre><code> Codeblock</pre></code> ~~~End~~~~~~~ ~~~Actual Result~~ <p>Codeblock</p> ~~~End~~~~~~~~ There is already a testcase in MDTest for codeblocks in the first line, though the above is still not handled properly! --
2014 Jan 17
0
Opus in WebM
On Jan 17, 2014, at 2:19 PM, Benjamin Schwartz wrote: > Yes, it's basically an intrinsic aspect of the mathematics. If you seek into the middle of an Opus stream, that's about how long it takes before the audio converges to be correct. I see. Thanks for the info. Any idea about the other Matroska tags? I guess CodecDelay will be the value you get from OPUS_GET_LOOKAHEAD()
2013 Dec 15
5
Real hardware for opus
So an iPod made in the last 4 years has not even a dsp that's used for help in low-power playback of mp3? What are my best options for a portable player I can put opus on and have 10 hours of opus playback? On Sun, Dec 15, 2013 at 6:10 PM, Jean-Marc Valin <jmvalin at jmvalin.ca> wrote: > The vast majority of audio players do *not* have special hardware for > MP3 and Vorbis.
2018 Nov 05
0
Antw: Re: Antw: Re: Possible bug in Opus 1.3
>>> Jan Stary <hans at stare.cz> schrieb am 05.11.2018 um 11:05 in Nachricht <20181105100534.GB44329 at www.stare.cz>: > (Are we off‑list now by intention?) No, just fooled by the list defaults (some need just reply, others need reply to all) > >> Did you also try to listen at the beginning, shortly before the real tone > appears in the audible spectrum?