similar to: Four new releases

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 10000 matches similar to: "Four new releases"

2019 Dec 18
0
opusenc for ambisonics?
Le 19-12-18 à 12 h 29, Marc Lavallée a écrit : > Hi Andrew, > > I suspect that the configure option should be enable-ambisonics > (instead of enable_ambisonics), but for each of opus, libopusenc, > opusfile and opus-tools git repos (on master branch), when I try > "./configure --enable-ambisonics", I get this error message: > > configure: WARNING: unrecognized
2019 Dec 19
1
opusenc for ambisonics?
Unfortunately, ambisonics aren't exposed in opusenc yet, thus the trouble. They're an API-only feature, but it's a good time to discuss what such a command-line interface would look like, notably: how to specify multiple streams & stream order, select the mapping family, coupled channels, and how to specify the matrix (for family 3). Likewise, there's no multistream support at
2019 Dec 18
2
opusenc for ambisonics?
Hi Andrew, I suspect that the configure option should be enable-ambisonics (instead of enable_ambisonics), but for each of opus, libopusenc, opusfile and opus-tools git repos (on master branch), when I try "./configure --enable-ambisonics", I get this error message: configure: WARNING: unrecognized options: --enable-ambisonics Thanks for your help. Marc Le 19-12-18 à 11 h 52, Andrew
2018 Sep 06
0
[PATCH] Support for Ambisonics
Hi Drew, Sorry for the delay. FYI the patch that you attached is not your latest version. This thread that you replied to is an older thread; the latest version is on a different thread. The patch does not use the mapping family numbers used by libopus and libopusenc; could you update it to use family 2 and 3 rather than 254 and 253? The patch also appears to break encoding of surround files
2018 Mar 26
0
[PATCH] Support for Ambisonics
Hello all! I've attached an updated patch for opusfile, based on formatting suggestions I got for the opus and libopusenc patches. Cheers! Drew On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 9:19 AM Drew Allen <bitllama at google.com> wrote: > Thanks! 2 down, 2 to go. :D :D :D > > On Wed, Mar 21, 2018 at 11:19 PM Jean-Marc Valin <jmvalin at jmvalin.ca> > wrote: > >> Thanks, the
2018 Mar 19
0
[PATCH] Support for Ambisonics
Hi Jean-Marc, I've modified my patches for libopus and libopusenc based on your suggestions. Cheers, Drew On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 2:05 PM Jean-Marc Valin <jmvalin at jmvalin.ca> wrote: > Hi Drew, > > I think the libopusenc patch is better, but there's still a few issues > left: > 1) The static MAX_PACKET_BUFFER_SIZE value is still problematic because > if you
2018 Sep 16
1
[PATCH] Support for Ambisonics
Since the opusenc and opusinfo changes were independent I split them up and landed the opusinfo changes (with updated mapping family numbers). - Mark On Thu, Sep 6, 2018 at 4:22 AM, Mark Harris <mark.hsj at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Drew, > > Sorry for the delay. > > FYI the patch that you attached is not your latest version. This > thread that you replied to is an older
2018 Jul 07
0
[PATCH] Support for Ambisonics
Minor thing missed: Adding the files to the VS project file. (Sorry for the direct reply, Drew, Gmail's interface always trips me up on mailing lists.) On Fri, Jul 6, 2018 at 6:06 PM Joshua Bowman <silverbacknet at gmail.com> wrote: > Minor thing missed: Adding the files to the VS project file. > > (Sorry for the direct reply, Drew, Gmail's interface always trips me up
2019 Dec 18
2
opusenc for ambisonics?
I compiled the latest (git master) of opus, libopusenc, opusfile and opus-tools: $ opusenc --version opusenc opus-tools 0.2-8-g4976421 (using libopus 1.3.1-4-gad8fe90d) I tried to encode a 3rd order Ambisonics wav file with the standard Ambix (ACN-SN3D) format; opusinfo is reporting : Streams: 16, Coupled: 0     Channel Mapping Family: 255 Map: [0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14,
2018 Mar 20
2
[PATCH] Support for Ambisonics
Attached is an updated patch based on Jean-Marc and Mark's comments. :) Cheers, Drew On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 9:20 AM Jean-Marc Valin <jmvalin at jmvalin.ca> wrote: > On 03/20/2018 11:51 AM, Drew Allen wrote: > > Just to confirm, I would use opeint_* for all the > > OpusGenericEncoder-related functions? > > Correct. Or you can also use oge_ if you like. Just
2019 Dec 18
0
opusenc for ambisonics?
Hi Marc, In order to use the ambisonics API, if you haven't already, you will need to activate the enable_ambisonics build flag during configuration. Then, when encoding the file, make sure to manually select mapping family 3 since opus does not auto-detect ambisonic files. Let me know if you have any questions! Cheers, Andrew On Tue, Dec 17, 2019 at 7:16 PM Marc Lavallée <marc at
2018 Mar 08
2
[PATCH] Move demixing matrix defines
Hello Jean-Marc et all, I've attached an updated patch which I feel addresses all 3 cases. PTAL, Thanks! Cheers, Drew On Wed, Mar 7, 2018 at 8:39 PM Jean-Marc Valin <jmvalin at jmvalin.ca> wrote: > Make sure the modified libraries work in all of these three cases: > 1) libopus 1.2.1 > 2) libopus master (or 1.3-beta) with --enable-ambisonics > 3) libopus master (or
2018 Mar 22
0
[PATCH] Support for Ambisonics
Thanks, the libopus and the libopusenc patches are now merged. Cheers, Jean-Marc On 03/20/2018 12:36 PM, Drew Allen wrote: > Attached is an updated patch based on Jean-Marc and Mark's comments. :) > > Cheers, > Drew > > On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 9:20 AM Jean-Marc Valin <jmvalin at jmvalin.ca > <mailto:jmvalin at jmvalin.ca>> wrote: > > On
2018 Jul 30
2
Fwd: [PATCH] Support for Ambisonics
Friendly ping for the opus-tools patch... ---------- Forwarded message --------- From: Drew Allen <bitllama at google.com> Date: Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 2:53 PM Subject: Re: [PATCH] Support for Ambisonics To: opus at xiph.org <opus at xiph.org> On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 11:52 AM Drew Allen <bitllama at google.com> wrote: > Hello all, > > Sorry for the delay (got really
2018 Mar 20
0
[PATCH] Support for Ambisonics
On 03/20/2018 11:51 AM, Drew Allen wrote: > Just to confirm, I would use opeint_* for all the > OpusGenericEncoder-related functions? Correct. Or you can also use oge_ if you like. Just don't use something that starts with an underscore. > On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 8:38 AM Jean-Marc Valin <jmvalin at jmvalin.ca > <mailto:jmvalin at jmvalin.ca>> wrote: > > Hi
2018 Mar 12
0
[PATCH] Move demixing matrix defines
Hi Drew, I think the idea of returning OPUS_UNIMPLEMENTED for all projection encoder/decoder calls is pretty reasonable. I haven't looked in detail, but I think some of the calls are missing. I think all calls should have that behaviour and not just the ones used by libopusenc. As for the includes, how about leaving OPUS_PROJECTION_*_REQUEST in opus_projection.h, but defining
2018 Mar 20
0
[PATCH] Support for Ambisonics
Hi Mark, Drew, On 03/20/2018 02:40 AM, Mark Harris wrote: > + int _oge_use_projection(int channel_mapping); > > These functions are part of libopusenc, so I'd expect them to have an > ope prefix like the other functions in the libopusenc library. I'd like to avoid using the ope_ prefix for functions that's aren't in the public API. Right now there are other functions
2018 Mar 26
3
[PATCH] Support for Ambisonics
Apologies! That patch will not work correctly with Opus 1.2. Will send an updated patch shortly!! On Mon, Mar 26, 2018 at 11:56 AM Drew Allen <bitllama at google.com> wrote: > Hello all! > > I've attached an updated patch for opusfile, based on formatting > suggestions I got for the opus and libopusenc patches. > > Cheers! > Drew > > On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at
2018 Mar 20
2
[PATCH] Support for Ambisonics
Just to confirm, I would use opeint_* for all the OpusGenericEncoder-related functions? On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 8:38 AM Jean-Marc Valin <jmvalin at jmvalin.ca> wrote: > Hi Mark, Drew, > > On 03/20/2018 02:40 AM, Mark Harris wrote: > > + int _oge_use_projection(int channel_mapping); > > > > These functions are part of libopusenc, so I'd expect them to have an
2018 Mar 19
0
[PATCH] Support for Ambisonics
On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 11:52 AM Drew Allen <bitllama at google.com> wrote: > Hello all, > > Sorry for the delay (got really sick last week). > > Attached are updated patches for libopus, libopusenc, opusfile and > opus-tools. > > Note that the patches for libopusenc, opusfile and opus-tools are > dependent on the patch for libopus. > > Please let me know if