similar to: A potential error in opus-1.1.3

Hello all! I have a problem to extract values greater that for example 1820. I try this code: x[x[,1]>1820,]->x1 Please help me! Thank you! The data structure is: structure(c(2.576, 1.728, 3.434, 2.187, 1.928, 1.886, 1.2425, 1.23, 1.075, 1.1785, 1.186, 1.165, 1.732, 1.517, 1.4095, 1.074, 1.618, 1.677, 1.845, 1.594, 1.6655, 1.1605, 1.425, 1.099, 1.007, 1.1795, 1.3855, 1.4065, 1.138, 1.514,

Hello all! I have a problem to group my data (years) in 10 years classes. For example for year year decade 1598 1590-1600 1599 1590-1600 1600 1590-1600 1601 1600-1610 --- my is like this> [1] 1598 1599 1600 1601 1602 1603 1604 1605 1606 1607 1608 1609 1610 1611 1612 [16] 1613 1614 1615 1616 1617 1618 1619 1620 1621 1622 1623 1624 1625 1626 1627 [31] 1628 1629 1630 1631 1632 1633

Hello all, I'll cut to the chase -- several weeks ago, I thought I had an upstart configuration file that would start Samba4 when the VM was turned on; but it turns out I was wrong. At the time there was nothing on the wiki about it (the links were broken). The script I thought was working was simply: start on runlevel [2345] exec /usr/local/samba/sbin/samba In any case, looking at the

Hi Jean-Marc, I used the following code after init of the encoder to get the frame size of my RTP packets. char pcm_data[3200]; char speex_data[3200]; SpeexBits bits; memset(pcm_data, '\0', 3200); memset(speex_data, '\0', 3200); speex_bits_init(&bits); speex_bits_reset(&bits); speex_encode_int(codec_info->enc,

Thanks, Vedant. Yes, we have done a lot of testing of Clang/LLVM (and GCC) in the past several years (more details at https://people.inf.ethz.ch/suz/emi/index.html): [GCC/LLVM bugs: *1,602* (total) / *1,007* (fixed)] [Reports: GCC (link1 <http://tinyurl.com/ojzdt78>, link2 <http://tinyurl.com/oxlkmjc>, link3 <http://tinyurl.com/jd3jnl3>, link4

You may also be interested in the following resources on compilers correctness (articles, software, and talks -- from the general topics to the ones specifically focused on testing, validation, and verification): https://github.com/MattPD/cpplinks/blob/master/compilers.correctness.md Best regards, Matt P. Dziubinski On 12/7/2018 20:19, Philip Reames via llvm-dev wrote: > There's also

Dear all I have a dataset examining the probability of a population surviving (calculated from a logistic regression) of a species over a 200yr period. The predictor variables are either continuous but non-normal (e.g. temperature, oxygen) or categorical (e.g. channelisation), unfortunately I also have a large amount of missing values. Year Decline Temperature Oxygen Channelisation 1800

For what it's worth, I just ran this on PowerPC and a double bootstrap with lit and lnt tests passes everything. On Sun, Jun 11, 2017 at 12:38 AM, Zhendong Su via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Sure, we are happy to start some testing to see what we may help find. > > On Sat, Jun 10, 2017 at 3:36 PM, Daniel Berlin <dberlin at dberlin.org> > wrote:

Dear LLVMers, my name is Douglas, and I would like to participate in the Summer of Code this year. I am currently a Computer Science student at the Federal University of Minas Gerais, Brazil, and I work as a research assistant at the Programming Languages Lab, in that university. I work together with Andre Tavares and Andrei Rimsa, two summer of coders last year, and my advisor is Fernando

Stack: (gdb) bt #0 0x0000000000aaf38a in silk_VAD_GetNoiseLevels (pX=pX at entry=0x7f26740297a0, psSilk_VAD=psSilk_VAD at entry=0x15897c38) at silk/VAD.c:315 #1 0x0000000000aa4a9d in silk_VAD_GetSA_Q8_sse4_1 (psEncC=0x15897c18, pIn=<optimized out>) at silk/x86/VAD_sse.c:177 #2 0x0000000000a9f92b in silk_encode_do_VAD_FLP (psEnc=psEnc at entry=0x15897c18) at

Hello again, I'm trying to purge the indexes in i.delete from frame and end up with more rows!? Please be so kind and let me know where I screw this up ... Joh > i.delete [1] 40 45 165 212 253 270 280 287 301 352 421 433 463 467 487 [16] 517 537 542 573 594 596 612 614 621 635 650 696 699 707 732 [31] 738 776 826 891 892 936 937 935 940 976

douglas at dcc.ufmg.br wrote: > Dear LLVMers, > > [snip] > Well, there are many other applications. In short, I would like to know if > the LLVM community would be interested in such a project. I have been > working on this for two months, and I am pretty confident I can implement > a good range analysis. I am basing my work on a paper by Zhendong and > Wagner: "A

Sounds good to me. On 6/19/2017 2:27 PM, Davide Italiano via llvm-dev wrote: > On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 11:22 AM, Nemanja Ivanovic via llvm-dev > <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >> For what it's worth, I just ran this on PowerPC and a double bootstrap with >> lit and lnt tests passes everything. >> > I fixed the only bug that has been reported (there were

Hi Jean-Marc, gdb out is "Program terminated with signal 8, Arithmetic exception." most likely this division by zero. you're right, this crash is reproduce on seq number 4294967265 (20ms rtp packet). This is about 994 days. "Jean-Marc Valin" <jmvalin at jmvalin.ca> писал(а):Hi Dmitry, > >So it's not explicitly in your report, but it looks like the crash

Hello everyone! We are working on writing a paper about testing the reliability of C compilers by using Csmith (a random C99 program generator). A previous testing effort, using Csmith, found 202 LLVM bugs, which represented 2% of all reported bugs at that time (PDF: https://www.flux.utah.edu/download?uid=114 <https://www.flux.utah.edu/download?uid=114>): . However, after this paper was

Can you share you compile-time and memory footprint measurements at least for CTMark? For a new pass/feature it would be great to share this with the community before you commit. Or did I miss them? Thanks Gerolf > On Jun 27, 2017, at 3:26 PM, Geoff Berry via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > EarlyCSE w/ MemorySSA has been enabled by default as of r306477 >

# create a matrix with some random NAs in it > m<-matrix(NA,nrow=15,ncol=14) > m[,3:14]<-52 > m[13,9]<-NA > m[4:7,8]<-NA > m[1:2,5]<-NA > m[,2]<-rep(1800:1804, by=3) > y<-order(m[,2]) > m<-m[y,] > m[,1]<-rep(1:3,by=5) > m [,1] [,2] [,3] [,4] [,5] [,6] [,7] [,8] [,9] [,10] [,11] [,12] [,13] [,14] [1,] 1 1800 52 52 NA 52 52

+1 If possible, it definitely helps to fuzz it. On Sat, Jun 10, 2017 at 2:45 PM, Davide Italiano via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > On Sat, Jun 10, 2017 at 8:21 AM, Geoff Berry via llvm-dev > <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > Hi All, > > > > I'd like to switch the function simplification run of EarlyCSE to use > > MemorySSA by

On Sat, Oct 14, 2017 at 11:05 AM, John Regehr via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > These are definitely LLVM bugs. It would be best to report reduced test > cases against top of tree. > > We should have some automated infrastructure for finding these too... > > John > Zhendong & friends generally do that (and reported many bugs :) I tried that myself,

tree: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git master head: 7b50567bdcad8925ca1e075feb7171c12015afd1 commit: 0737e01de9c411e4db87dcedf4a9789d41b1c5c1 ocfs2: ocfs2_mount_volume does cleanup job before return error config: arm64-randconfig-m041-20230329 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20230401/202304012244.gX4H4rBO-lkp at intel.com/config) compiler: