similar to: set opus complexity

1. If you're building in CCS, I hope you have created new projects and imported the source and header files. 2. Then right click on project you want to build -> Build Properties -> Under C600 Compiler, click on Basic Options -> Change Optimization level On Fri, Sep 6, 2013 at 12:30 AM, <opus-request at xiph.org> wrote: > Send opus mailing list submissions to >

The opus code default compiles on -o2 optimization level. I would like to change it to -o3. I have tried doing the changes in makefile.unix . The change is not getting reflected. I am building the code in Code composer studio for TI processor C6000. Could anybody help me with this -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Hi,? Anyone could provide more information on the level of complexity (OPUS_SET_COMPLEXITY(x) , x between 0 and 10 ?) which is recommended for generic Android devices ? How about the iPhone devices ??Is there a way to choose this complexity level according to the device model ? Any hints ? We've seen they set 5 in webrtc :http://code.google.com/p/webrtc/issues/detail?id=3093Freeswitch is

LS. After upgrading from samba 3.0.7 to samba-3.0.9 it appears that algorithmic rid base is now checked to be larger then 1000 . Because of this I get the follwoing error when trying to log in: [2004/11/19 18:26:50, 2] lib/smbldap.c:smbldap_search_domain_info(1374) Searching for:[(&(objectClass=sambaDomain)(sambaDomainName=<DOMAIN>))] [2004/11/19 18:26:50, 2]

Dear R-bugs I have been studying the StructTS function (in package 'stats') and functions supplied with it. I think I have found a few minor bugs in the documentation. I am referring to the version of StructTS supplied with the release R 2.0.0. Output from 'version' platform i386-pc-mingw32 arch i386 os mingw32 system i386, mingw32 status

On 13-08-14 10:09 PM, Bob Estes wrote: > I've been studying the Opus code and documentation for a while and have > seen it mentioned several times that Opus uses pre-skip to allow the > codec to converge. What convergence are they referring to? Rate > control? Energy envelope prediction after seeking? Not rate control, but there are a number of predictors running in the

Hi Ralph, Gentle reminder.. Regards, Rhishi -----Original Message----- From: Rhishikesh Agashe Sent: Friday, September 20, 2013 11:02 To: 'Ralph Giles' Subject: RE: [opus] Need info on optimizing Opus code for a particular core/processor Hi Ralph, Can you let me know how to submit my code for review? What is the procedure? Also, could you create an account for the same let me know

"Unfortunately my search for a good free player for Android was not very successful" - I presume you are using an Android device. If that's the case, portable devices have really bad electronics from the point of view of HiFi - because of low voltage and output amplitude being close to power rails. My point is that you are not really comparing one lossy format to another, but rather

I hope it is OK to ask an Opus question here. If not, please advise the correct forum. Regarding the statement "Internally, the codec always operates at a 48 kHz sampling rate, though it allows input and output of various bandwidths..." Can I infer from this that it is most CPU efficient to always input and output PCM data at 48000 samples per sec, regardless of other factors such as

Hello, I understand the encoder provides an option for FEC to provide some protection against packet loss, but I don't understand the details of this arrangement. I'd appreciate answers to the following: * Adding FEC seems to change the encoded audio bit-stream itself, i.e., it doesn't just add additional protection bits, but also changes the encoded bits. This is easy to show by

Yes, that's a start. Ultimately, though, I'm hoping to reduce the 80ms requirement, and am trying to get a handle on what state in the decoder must converge and what complications I might be up against. I'm also only considering CELT-based encodings if that simplifies things. I know that Opus can do inter-frame energy envelope prediction, but that dependency can be eliminated by

Hi, I have noticed a strange behavior: after the added one of the options "window_match" in scale and switcher plugins; these do not show some windows like gmplayer or amsn's windows This is the output of xprop $ xprop _NET_WINDOW_DECOR(INTEGER) = 20061011, 46149375, 4, 4, 27, 4, 4, 4, 27, 4, 9, 0, 36965, -11, -34, -68, 0, 582, 32767, 0, 0, 32869, 571, -34, -68, 0, 32767,

Hi, Just to clear things up... So 1.1 has some new analysis code that increases the amount of CPU. When building as floating point (which you appear to be doing, right?), the new code is enabled at complexity 7 and up (opusenc defaults to complexity 10 IIRC). This is why you've been seeing an increase in the CPU time. In version 1.0.x, complexity 5-10 are the exactly the same for music.

Hi! Sorry, I know the rules for comparing objective subjective listening impressions, but I'd like to know whether from the algorithmic or implementer's point of view the following personal impressions can be confirmed: Comparing MP3 with Vorbis at rather high bitrates, I had the impression the Vorbis sounded more crispy, while MP3 sounded somewhat softened. I preferred Vorbis for that

Hello All, We have been doing an optimised port of OPUS to a ARM Cortex A9. We are currently measuring between 20 and 90 MCPS for our code running on a Panda board (single core), this covers all bit-rates,sample rates for stereo coding (encode + decode) under normal operation. As Marc says complexity can be controlled via the API with our higher figure corresponding to the default setting of

libswfdec/swfdec_as_interpret.c | 51 + test/trace/Makefile.am | 16 test/trace/chartoascii-4.swf |binary test/trace/chartoascii-4.swf.trace | 7 test/trace/chartoascii-5.swf |binary test/trace/chartoascii-5.swf.trace | 1011 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ test/trace/chartoascii-6.swf |binary test/trace/chartoascii-6.swf.trace | 1008

When I dont specify --block-size but have --write-batch=xxx, I get a xxx.rsync_csum file that is 76 Kbytes in size. The size of the file varies as the size of the "reference" file is varied. --stats showed matched data that is roughly 6 block lengths based on the square root of the newer file. I copy the original data back to the target directory so that I can repeat the experiment. I

I insert an function call in the IR, and causes the following error. and the error seems to happen on some cases. The attached file nest.c can be processes successfully and the nest-ddp.ll is the output file, but the nr__routines.c will fail. llvm-3.2-svn/lib/VMCore/DebugLoc.cpp:60: void llvm::DebugLoc::getScopeAndInlinedAt(llvm::MDNode*&, llvm::MDNode*&, const llvm::LLVMContext&)

I have the following set of indices, call it idx, that correspond to the indices of a vector say temp. [1] 31 36 41 61 66 71 91 96 101 121 126 131 151 156 161 181 186 191 211 216 221 241 246 251 271 276 281 301 306 311 331 336 341 361 366 [36] 371 391 396 401 421 426 431 451 456 461 481 486 491 511 516 521 541 546 551 571 576 581

On 04/28/2015 06:05 PM, Akemi Yagi wrote: > On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 3:10 PM, Johnny Hughes <johnny at centos.org> wrote: > >> CentOS is not approved for DOD use. In fact, CentOS is not now, nor has >> it ever been *certified* for anything. Certifications require people to >> PAY to certify a product. >> >> Specifically, EAL4 Certification, a requirement