similar to: Enabling Replay Gain (album or single track) with Opus codec

OK, here's a problem: I want to set the album replay gain in each track, but I'm using grip to rip and encode the tracks one by one. grip knows that all the tracks are on a single album, but FLAC sees them one at a time. I put the --replay-gain option on the FLAC command line, so it emits four comments into the vorbis commebnt block, e.g.: comment[9]:

opusdec -V opusdec opus-tools f2a2e88 (using libopus unknown) I've got an opus file encoded from a .wav off a cd, 44100Hz: opusinfo 2-24-Overture_in_C_\(In_Memoriam\).opus Processing file "2-24-Overture_in_C_(In_Memoriam).opus"... New logical stream (#1, serial: 38134f1f): type opus Encoded with libopus unknown User comments section follows... ENCODER=opusenc from opus-tools

switch between speech and music encoding rather quickly. I wanted to try that for a CD track that has a vocal (talk) introduction = followed by music (just two instruments). Using foobar2000 with some custom setup for Opus, I tried VBR encoding = with a 256kbps setting (opus-tools-0.1.9-win32). My expectation was that = the bitrate would be significantly lower than 256kbps while speech is =

>On 11/20/2013 03:37 PM, O'Connor, Kevin wrote: >> I have an application I intend to use Opus for that involves creating >> recordings of two-party conversations where each party is saved as a >> separate channel. Audio may be later processed or analyzed on a >> per-party basis so if audio in one channel affects the other channel, it >> could create problems.

Hi! I'm using the opus-tools package from the current Debian (it says it is 0.1.2). The output of opusinfo is strange: $ opusinfo demo01.opus Processing file "demo01.opus"... New logical stream (#1, serial: 0000456a): type opus Encoded with libopus 1.0.1-rc3 User comments section follows... ENCODER=opusenc from opus-tools 0.1.5 Opus stream 1: Pre-skip: 356 Playback

Hi, I'm a FLAC beginner and I had a question about the meaning of track and album gain. I think it's a stupid question, but hey, I must learn it somewhere ;) So I wanted to know what track and album gain means. I use winamp for playing my encoded FLAC files and when I look at the properties of a FLAC file I can see this: track gain: not present album gain: not present So I was

2007/4/1, Ivo Emanuel Gon?alves <justivo@gmail.com>: > > Those are Replay Gain elements. Please check on Wikipedia or > Hydrogenaudio for more information on RG. In short, they are values > to normalize in a lossless way the audio volume. Hi, But how can this be possibly lossless? You change the volume of the audio tracks, so isn't this lossy or does the actual volume

Hi, I think I might have kind of, sort of found a bug in opusenc. But do correct me if I am worng. :) When converting an FLAC file that contains RG tags written by bs1770gain the resulting opus file has a way, way too high RG value. I am talking >90dB(!). Here is the metaflac output of the flac file: % metaflac --block-number=2 --list bs.1770/test.flac METADATA block #2 type: 4

Erik, I suspect /bin/sh being dash is what is causing the problem. I will rework the syntax. Earl ________________________________ From: Erik de Castro Lopo <mle+la at mega-nerd.com> To: flac-dev at xiph.org Cc: Earl Chew <earl_chew at yahoo.com> Sent: Sunday, March 11, 2012 10:59:50 PM Subject: Re: [flac-dev] PATCH: Add test for metaflac --add-replay-gain Earl Chew wrote:

Earl Chew wrote: > There is only one test to verify handling of harmonics of the filter table > sampling frequencies. Earl, I've had a couple of attempts to get this patch working, without luck. With this patch applied, when i run the test_metaflac.sh script, I get: Testing FLAC file with unknown metadata... OK ./test_metaflac.sh: line 450: syntax error near unexpected token

Fix for padding with --replay-gain option. Ported from flac 1.2.1 maintenance branch: http://flac.cvs.sourceforge.net/viewvc/flac/flac/src/flac/encode.c?r1=1.194&r2=1.194.2.1&pathrev=FLAC_RELEASE_1_2_1_MAINTENANCE_BRANCH http://flac.cvs.sourceforge.net/viewvc/flac/flac/src/flac/main.c?r1=1.169&r2=1.169.2.1&pathrev=FLAC_RELEASE_1_2_1_MAINTENANCE_BRANCH -------------- next part

lvqcl wrote: > Fix for padding with --replay-gain option. Ported from flac 1.2.1 > maintenance branch: > > http://flac.cvs.sourceforge.net/viewvc/flac/flac/src/flac/encode.c?r1=1.194&r2=1.194.2.1&pathrev=FLAC_RELEASE_1_2_1_MAINTENANCE_BRANCH > >

Erik de Castro Lopo wrote: > All 9 patchsets applied, tested and pushed. Thanks! Great, thanks. (Un)fortunately, I have yet more patches...

I don't recall seeing anything about how to apply the same gain to an album as opposed to a mix of tracks. Man page and site seem vacant on it. Any clues as to where to look? I looked at mpd but ended up not using it due it not working with my sound cards as I had them setup. I do remember there being a very good curses player though. Before leaving gnump3d worked quite well for me since

--- CE <ce7@sbcglobal.net> wrote: > I'm hoping to set up a headless system to playback my audio once I > get back home after an extended leave. Ideally I'd just ssh in and > use a curses based player to play back FLACs and mp3s. This leads me > to a few quesitons: > 1. What is the minimun processor speed needed to decode and play > flac files? I have an old

Thanks! You've been most informative. Do the command line options vary for album and track or is the album gain computed automatically if it's done on a batch of files? You Wrote: > > there are two tags for replaygain, the 'album' tag which applies > to the whole album, and 'track' tag for each track.

Thanks :D I did see that but wasn't sure if there was an option needed or how it decided to do the album gain. I fiddled with metaflac and checked for the REPLAYGAIN_ALBUM_GAIN and my files seem to have it :D Suppose there is only 1 file to encode. Does FLAC still add the album gains? You Wrote: > see > http://flac.sourceforge.net/documentation.html#flac_options_replay_gain >

Hi List, Is there a way to correctly use the replay-gain feature on flac files that contain an entire album (i.e., multiple tracks with seekpoints added from a cue sheet)? -- Chris

On Sun, Apr 13, 2008 at 02:10:51AM -0500, Charles Velasquez wrote: > If that is the case, why is there a warning in the foobar2000 > converter dialogue box stating that "applying ReplayGain adjustment > during conversion will irreversibly alter data in encoded file, > unlike ReplayGain scan after encode"? ReplayGain, as the name implies, works by calculating a scaling-factor

Ah! metaflac, thanks, but won't this cause metaflac to combine flac's across directories and give an album replay gain for the combined flac's? (as opposed to separate albums i.e. metaflac /album1/*.flac /album2/*.flac as opposed to metaflac /album1/*.flac, metaflac /album2/*.flac) On Dec 30, 2009, at 11:43 AM, Nicholas Wilson wrote: > Run from the top directory: > >