similar to: Forming a "Project Leadership Committee"

For a number of years now, the Samba Team has been a member of the Software Freedom Conservancy. They handle quite a bit of administration for our project as well as pursuing GPL compliance. If you'd like to see more about what they do, please check: https://sfconservancy.org/about/ We urge you to support the Conservancy. Here is a message from our own Jeremy Allison:

"Bradley M. Kuhn" <bkuhn at sfconservancy.org> writes: > I'm sorry for the intrusion of a project policy discussion onto the > developer list, but there may be many here who may have thoughts, input, > or question regarding Conservancy's offer for LLVM's membership, > discussed below. If you're not interested in that topic, please feel > free to

On Sep 19, 2012, at 10:14 AM, dag at cray.com wrote: > "Bradley M. Kuhn" <bkuhn at sfconservancy.org> writes: >> I'm sorry for the intrusion of a project policy discussion onto the >> developer list, but there may be many here who may have thoughts, input, >> or question regarding Conservancy's offer for LLVM's membership, >> discussed below.

Hi all, You may not know, but The Software Freedom Conservancy is the legal home of the Samba project. However, most Linux-using corporations *really* hate GPL enforcement. To the point where they'll pull funding for diversity programs and try and get conference talks cancelled. I hope Samba users will help support Conservancy so it can continue doing vital work for us and other projects.

We are equally excited about working with you over summer. I think you missed reply by Olly on IRC, you can find it in logs here: https://botbot.me/freenode/xapian/2018-04-24/?msg=99336093&page=1 - olly icebyte[m]: i think that probably needs to go through SFC ( https://sfconservancy.org/) as the "legal entity" - 2:05 am

Apologies if this is a little off-topic, but the Software Freedom Conservancy (which is the legal umberella organization for the Samba Project and may other Free Software projects such as Wine) just announced their "Supporters" program: http://sfconservancy.org/supporter/ Please check it out, and if you're feeling generous - join :-). Disclaimer: I'm on the Board of Directors

Hi, I'm new to Xapian and wanted to know if it has a specific feature. I want to be able to check the relation between two terms on a page based on how close they are together on the page. I want to use a combination of n-gram based labeling and the "slop" feature found in Elasticsearch. Does Xapian have this/a similar feature? I haven't been able to find any programs that have

I have a project that requires Xapian for a 32 bit arch, but Mac defaults to 64 bit. How can I configure Xapian core and Xapian python bindings to build 32 bit?

I have a project that requires Xapian for a 32 bit arch, but Mac defaults to 64 bit. How can I configure Xapian core and Xapian python bindings to build 32 bit?

Dear Sir, I'm doing a literature survey on search engines. As Xapian is open source, I think I can get the information required by me.  I assume that your system builds a list of keywords and tags to every keyword the documents where it can be found. My questions are as follows: 1. What is the search algorithm used for searching the list of keywords that your search engine has?. Is it the

Hi all, Some history. Samba has historically only accepted code with personal, not corporate copyright attached. There were a couple of good reasons for this in the past, one of which was that we preferred GPL enforcement decisions to be made by individuals, not by corporations. Under GPLv2, a license violator loses all rights under the license and these have to be reinstated by the copyright

Hello, I am a newcomer to R and therefore apologize for posting such a basic question. I am trying to multiply 2 matrices t(X1)%*%X1, where t(X1) is: 1 2 3 4 5 8 12 13 20 24 26 27 31 33 34 36 37 40 41 42 45 46 47 48 49 ones 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Shadow 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 0

On Sep 18, 2012, at 5:46 PM, Bradley M. Kuhn <bkuhn at sfconservancy.org> wrote: > I'm sorry for the intrusion of a project policy discussion onto the > developer list, but there may be many here who may have thoughts, input, > or question regarding Conservancy's offer for LLVM's membership, > discussed below. If you're not interested in that topic, please feel

> > I'd suggest to start with you just look at moving the libmagic check after > the filesize checks, so you don't need to get into whether libmagic or > the database check is cheaper on average. hi, Olly, I have moved the libmagic check after the filesize check directly, https://github.com/caiyulun/xapian/commit/3a97d9ee5397fa900a473aa9b3d8eeb720177a4e can you provide

On 7/22/23 02:29, Gordon Messmer wrote: > On 2023-07-21 00:30, Lee Thomas Stephen wrote: >> But for my business, I do not want to pay Red Hat, Zimbra, or Google >> Workspace. >> Why ? >> Because the general rule seems to be >> Oh! You are an individual, we will offer you affordable/free service >> What! You are a business, we will offer you extremely

Hi Everyone, Many tech communities, including GitHub <https://github.com/github/renaming> and Git <https://sfconservancy.org/news/2020/jun/23/gitbranchname/>, have moved away from term “master branch” and replaced it with “main branch” in an effort to remove unnecessary references to slavery and use more inclusive terms. This was also discussed on the LLVM-dev mailing list

> You could do that by identifying the search session instead of the user, > which makes it closer to what we need than to something that might trip you > into privacy concerns. Okay, that would be much better. :) > Third records some information about what sort of query it is — add, > morelike or a plain query. Last provides the estimated match size and then > the HTTP

This might be a little late but I was engaged in my university examinations. Moreover, I have an exam even today so apologies for the delay. Also, I had to change my project from weighting schemes to improve to improve estimated total number of results as weighting schemes was demanding a lot of time going through it. I would really appreciate if you could review my proposal asap.

All, I'm having some issues compiling omega. Here are the particulars I'm on win7, using cygwin 4.9.2 64 bit. Here's the relevant output from make: libtool: link: g++ -fshow-column -Wall -W -Wredundant-decls -Wpointer-arith -Wca st-qual -Wcast-align -Wno-long-long -Wformat-security -fno-gnu-keywords -Wundef -Woverloaded-virtual -Wstrict-null-sentinel -Wshadow -Wstrict-overflow=1

Hi, I would send an introductory e-mail to: R-foundation at R-project.org <mailto:R-foundation at R-project.org> That will facilitate further discussion on the matter and additional details can be requested offline as may be needed. Be aware that none of the R Foundation members are lawyers. So while we can perhaps offer informal and non-binding opinions, you should seek formal legal