similar to: libvirt-sandbox on Fedora 21

On Wed, 24 Sep 2014, Gene Czarcinski wrote: > It sure would be nice if someone who knows what they are doing took a look at > this problem: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1135762 > The current situation on Fedora 21 is that virt-sandbox and > virt-sandbox-service simply do not work if a network is defined (e.g., -N > address-192.168.1.1/34) Your example in the

Is there any documentation/tutorial that explains how to use virt-sandbox-service? After looking at some writeups about virt-sandbox-service, this looks like a good tool for something I need to do. But, following the "examples" I cannot get anything to work correctly. With a simple xfce install with httpd, lighttpd, and libvirt-sandbox installed, I tried: 1. virt-sandbox-service

Hi list, I'm trying to create an asterisk 1.8 rpm with SRTP. I found mention of a libsrtp rpm, <http://qutecom.ipex.cz/RPMS/srtp-1.4.4-1.i386.rpm > in these instructions, <http://www.voip-info.org/wiki/view/Asterisk+SRTP> but it is unreachable (by me, anyway). The libSRTP source is here, <http://srtp.sourceforge.net/download.html>. Has this already been packaged for

Some threads just go on too long. Personally I think a troll has hijacked the main centos list again and is inducing food fight behaviours while that troll perfectly 'innocently' asserting that it is just respoding to all email. see: http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-4216011961522818645 for a discussion of the problem of 'capture' in FOSS projects. But if one loses

On Sat, 9 May 2009, noreply at centos.org wrote: > The following page has been changed by DagWieers: > http://wiki.centos.org/Contribute?action=diff&rev2=21&rev1=20 > - * We also encourage you to request and to maintain a > personal homepage with your contact information -- some > people also use such a page to keep a note of their edits. > You may request that page

I seem to be having network and email issues tonight; please excuse any duplication -- Russ herrold -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 HTML dump on Thu Jul 30 00:30:33 EDT 2009 http://www.centos.org/ Open Letter to Lance Davis July 30, 2009 04:39 UTC This is an Open Letter to Lance Davis from fellow CentOS Developers It is regrettable that we are forced

Added an entry to http://wiki.centos.org/FAQ/General : 23. How do I provide appropriate information about my system when asking questions? Comments, corrections, and other (constructive :-) ) criticisms are hereby solicited. Phil

Hi All, I am currently using R version 2.8.1 on linux cent os 4.4 (i386) and want to upgrade to version 2.9.1. It seems to me that version-2.9.1 is it not for my OS. Am I right? Regards Utkarsh [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

All: Attached is the output file from building R 2.10.0 on RedHat Linux. I have never previously experienced any problems when building R from source with new releases. But, now I get a compile error with the Matrix package: CHOLMOD/Include/cholmod.h:87:22: error: UFconfig.h: No such file or directory make[3]: *** [CHMfactor.o] Error 1 make[3]: Leaving directory

I tried to run this: :(){ :&:;};: as a non-root user in my CentOS4 and it bring down my box to its knees. Take care. str

Just a note (mainly to get it clear for *me*!) where we are with libguestfs branches and Fedora/RHEL versions: Fedora ? ??? Fedora 16 libguestfs 1.16 (currently 1.16.29) ? ??? Fedora 17 libguestfs 1.18 (currently 1.18.6) ? ??? Fedora 18 (just libguestfs 1.19.28, will move to ? branched) stable 1.20 branch when it is ready ? ???

Is there something funny about rpm in Fedora 11 that causes cpio errors when trying to install src.rpm's in CentOS 5.3, or am I just getting repeated bad downloads?

I responded to a post in the Dell poweredge mailing list earlier today. My answer was off the top of my head, with a bit of experimentation. The content may be useful in the Cenyos context as well to admin's looking to strip the size of an install to the bare bones. Comment welcomed. Can anyone see any packages which I have missed? -- Russ Herrold ---------- Forwarded message

Hi People I have been following the instructions here http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/JavaOnCentOS but trying to modify them for jdk-6u7-linux-amd64.rpm but there doesn't see to be a compatible java-1.6.0-sun-compat-*.rpm. Does one exist ? If not can anyone point me to some documentation on how I can manually set up things so alternatives will work allowing multiple Java versions.

Hi, Hi, I have been googling, and can't find anything that will help me: mt -f /dev/st0 status /dev/st0: No such device or address Any suggestion? I am using CentOS 3 [RHEL ES3 without the licenses] The tape drive is recognized at boot [from dmesg] scsi0 : Adaptec AIC7XXX EISA/VLB/PCI SCSI HBA DRIVER, Rev 6.2.36 <Adaptec 29160 Ultra160 SCSI adapter> aic7892:

I am looking for documentation on the CentOS 7 "compose" process, specifically, the tools and scripts that generate the LiveOS image contained on the DVDs, as well as whatever produces the final DVD iso image files (mkisofs + isohybrid + ???). I asked on the -devel list, and the suggestion was to use this list instead. As far as I can determine, Fedora does this via pungi, but I am

I just noticed that the mod_ssl package was missing on a 5.x machine that I thought was approximately like several other that have it - and don't remember doing anything different. Is there some yum group that would install httpd without including it? -- Les Mikesell lesmikesell at gmail.com

Hello, does anybody know of a good source for a apr-util-pgsql rpm package for CentOS 5.6 / 64 bit and even more I'm curious why isn't it included but the apr-util-mysql is included... Thank you Alex

On Mon, 26 Apr 2004, Jacob Robert Wilkins wrote: > > I just installed the latest Centos and Yum keeps reporting that the > > correct GPG key are not installed. How do I install them? rpm --import http://mirror.centos.org/centos/3.1/i386/RPM-GPG-KEY-CentOS-3 > It's a common question. We need to do a better job of making the solution > known. now present at:

> Fetch the desired duplicity source code from > https://code.launchpad.net/duplicity/, unpack it and change > in its directory. There, just issue > > + {{{ > - python setup.py install > + python setup.py install}}} I see the above fragment in the draft newsletter, and frankly am disappointed at proposed content not using the packaging system. It is clearly not a