similar to: Forwarding incoming connections from an secondary external interface with dhcp

Okay, so I''m trying to setup my multiple ISP setup that I described earlier. I have: # ip addr 1: lo: <LOOPBACK,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 16436 qdisc noqueue state UNKNOWN link/loopback 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd 00:00:00:00:00:00 inet 127.0.0.1/8 scope host lo inet6 ::1/128 scope host valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever 2: em1: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP>

Gents, first of all thanks for tinc, and thanks in advance for your advice. At the risk of revealing my stupidity and opening myself to ridicule.... I am trying to connect a new remote lan into an existing tinc vpn with the central tinc vpn server located at 10.57.132.1 on the 10.57.132.0/24 subnet. I set up this central tinc vpn server myself along with several other remote lans linked to

Hi folks, sorry for my bad english, but I am not a native speaker. I want to setup a virtual firewall-host in a UML-Session. I''m using Kernel 2.4.27-um1 and shorewall 2.2.2-2 from Debian sarge. I have 4 nic''s in my System: eth0 -> localnet 0 eth1 -> localnet 1 eth2 -> wlan eth3 -> DSL/ppp0 I''m using four bridges br0,br1,br2,br3. The UML firewall host is

Hi there, i''m trying to shape incoming trafic on my linux box. I want it to depend on the source IP adress of the packets (in fact, i got a VPN on an ADSL link and wanted to get at least/max 64Kbit/s for the VPN) So i tried this : tc qdisc add dev ppp0 root handle 1:0 cbq bandwidth 512Kbit avpkt 1000 cell 8 tc class add dev ppp0 parent 1:0 classid 1:1 cbq bandwidth 512Kbit rate

Return-Path: <viuwier@wp.pl> X-Original-To: shorewall-announce@lists.shorewall.net Delivered-To: shorewall-announce@lists.shorewall.net Received: from smtp.wp.pl (smtp.wp.pl [212.77.101.160]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.shorewall.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3D8F33DB3 for

I''m trying to plan out a new configuration for our new multi-isp setup. Part of what is confusing me is the asymmetry between the two setups. Our current ISP provides us with a router and our first public IP is used by its LAN port. Our new provider is not providing a router and I want to user our shorewall box as the router. I have 4 ports on it (currently configured for local,

Hi Rahul, If you're certain that your problem isn't as Stephen suggested, you might want to have a look at this: --- (From http://ebtables.sourceforge.net/brnf-faq.html <http://ebtables.sourceforge.net/brnf-faq.html> ) How do I let vlan-tagged traffic go through a vlan bridge port and the other traffic through a non-vlan bridge port? Suppose eth0 and eth0.15 are ports of br0.

Hi. Before start i need to say that i lost a lot of weekends trying every single posible solution on the net. So this i s my last resource. This is NOT an ERROR, is just help to make something work. (sorry for my english) Hi have 3 zones loc eth0 => here we have 192.168.1.0/24 with 12 IP''s/PC''s I can subdivide in 2 tematics zones but if not needed there is no reason to

Laine I made the change and I can now ping across both bridges: br1 (192.168.0.0/24) and br1600 (192.168.1.0/24): br1: flags=4163<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST>  mtu 1500         inet 192.168.0.110  netmask 255.255.255.0  broadcast 192.168.0.255         inet6 fe80::1e98:ecff:fe1b:276d  prefixlen 64  scopeid 0x20<link>         ether 1c:98:ec:1b:27:6d  txqueuelen 1000  (Ethernet)

Hello, Anybody else run into problems with biosdevname .0.5..0-2 changing names from p2p1 to em1 when upgrading from biosdevname 0.4.1-3? Darn! I thought biosdevname was to keep the names the same!! -- Stephen Clark *NetWolves Managed Services, LLC.* Director of Technology Phone: 813-579-3200 Fax: 813-882-0209 Email: steve.clark at netwolves.com http://www.netwolves.com

Even more puzzling, I reverted back to the old configuration to confirm what I had seen and found that it works in one direction but not the other: i.e. from 192.168.0.110 to 192.168.0.120, but not the other way around. Must be something with my configuration....which I can follow up on. So, thanks again for your help. Richard On 12/3/19 11:36 AM, Richard Achmatowicz wrote: > Laine >

hi all, (this events ocurred before my previous mail about the uuid incident) so, I installed a vm host: rhel6 guest: centos6 network: bridge (br0, eth1 as slave) but then, I changed the name of the bridge from br0 to br1 (because br1<->eth1 seems pretty than br0<->eth1) so: - mv /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-br0 /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-br1 - edited

I have two adsl lines on my linux firewall box and i want to do some load balance between them...i tried a lot of different things, but it isn´t working...Following the instructions of http://lartc.org/howto/lartc.rpdb.multiple-links.html i used the configuration above. using "iptraf" I can see some few packets using the ppp1 connection, but almost all the packets use ppp0 connection.

I am experimenting with routing tables to obtain a little understanding of how things work. I have a kvm hypervisor host (KVM1) with two physical Ethernet nics configured as bridges (br0 and br1). KVM1 br0 is configured with a public ipv4 address [x.y.z.42/24] and br1 is configured with a private ipv4 address [192.168.216.42/24]. A second kvm hypervisor, KVM2, is similarly configured albeit with

When I start my script: * - Creating classes on br1 for upload control ... * - tc class add dev br1 parent 2:0 classid 2:46 hfsc ls m1 576.0Kbit d 2000ms m2 192.0Kbit ul m2 384Kbit ... [ ok ] * - tc class add dev br1 parent 2:46 classid 2:47 hfsc sc umax 1500b dmax 30ms rate 80Kbit . [ ok ] * - tc class add dev br1 parent 2:46 classid 2:48 hfsc ls m2 152.0Kbit ul m2 152.0Kbit

On 11/26/19 11:07 PM, Richard Achmatowicz wrote: > Hello > > I have a problem with attaching VMs to a VLAN interface. > > Here is my setup: I have several physical hosts connected by a physical > switch.  Each host has two NICs leading to the switch, which have been > combined into a team, team0. Each host a has a bridge br1, which has > team0 as a slave. So

Hi, I''m setting up my first xen machine, and I''m trying to setup two Virtual Machines, each mapped to a physical adapter on a different network. The virtual machine mapped to xen-br0 and eth0 works fine. However, when I bring up a VM with this configuration file: ----------------- name = "test77" kernel = "/boot/vmlinuz-2.6.11.12-xenU" root =

I have been looking at this problem on and off for a considerable period. Given my lack of knowledge I have been unable to resolve this quickly and in consequence it has been constantly shoved to the background as other issues arise. Here is the situation: I have two dual-homed kvm hosts both running CentOS-6.7 and identically configured. These are connected to the same LAN segment via

Hi all, I'm currently in the process of building a 2-Node libvirt/KVM Cluster and ran into some issues regarding the network connectivity of our virtual machines. Our setup seemed to work fine, we were able to browse to Google and our own company website and some others from within the VM. Then we tried microsoft.com to download some Windows iso images from MS Partner Network. The page

[desktop] ----- lan ----eth0 [notebook] eth1 192.168.?.? ` ----- wlan ---- [speedport(hub and router)] -- internet 192.168.2.x So on my laptop I have eth0 beeing lan, eth1 beeing wlan ethernet card. When only using eth0/1 everything is fine. Now I want to be able to use internet from both [desktop] and [notebook]. Typically you set up a bridge with