similar to: assign static public IP to container

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 Eric Blake @ 12/10/2013 06:24 AM: > [meta-question] > > I noticed you posted very similar mails several times in a row; I > suspect it was because you were unaware that the list is moderated, > and kept trying to repost when you didn't see your message hit the > archives. While we allow non-subscriber postings, all first-time

oh also would like to add that in the past when i post to a moderated list i usually receive an email explaining such, and offering me the opportunity to cancel the message by visiting a special URL (i think, or replying to the message e.g.) or wait for it to be approved. since i didn't receive any such email, i figured the duplicate posts were silently rejected.

[meta-question] On 12/08/2013 02:35 PM, scar wrote: > hello i have a server colocated in a datacenter with several external IP > addresses available to use. I noticed you posted very similar mails several times in a row; I suspect it was because you were unaware that the list is moderated, and kept trying to repost when you didn't see your message hit the archives. While we allow

I set up a Facebook profile where I can post my pictures, videos and events and I want to add you as a friend so you can see it. First, you need to join Facebook! Once you join, you can also create your own profile. Thanks, Andy Here's the link: http://www.facebook.com/p.php?i=612598021&k=63FYZWQ6WVVM5FEIWDV2PT&r&v=2 ___________________ This e-mail may contain promotional

On 11/12/13, Reindl Harald <h.reindl at thelounge.net> wrote: > tell that Noel which is blocking my messages and so did > not read what i quoted from Benny's trolling but opens > his mouth > > tell that Noel which is abusing his power by set complete > IP-ranges on RBL lists he maintains because he does not > like one person using a mailserver on that range besides

The CentOS team likes to offer an apology for the political spam mails which went through our mail servers earlier today. Due to the nature of mailing list software for public discussion groups, there aren't that many security measures which can be taken to check which mails are supposed to get through and which mails aren't. Total safety can only be had by a moderation of all lists -

On 06/12/2015 12:18 PM, Jonathan Billings wrote: > On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 12:05:16PM -0600, jd1008 wrote: >> Mark, please be aware that noscript has also a whitelist >> that is not viewable by the user. >> The whitelist tab does NOT list the hidden white listed >> entries. > You mean the noscript.mandatory about:config entry? I looked at it on > my computer and

All other patches from the sequence remain unchanged. Repost of patch 6 based on comments from Joey to follow. Mike

I've been away from this list but reentered recently. Now when I send a question I get an automated answer saying: ------- Your mail to 'R-help' with the subject .............. Is being held until the list moderator can review it for approval. The reason it is being held: Post to moderated list ------- Is this the new style of the list? G?ran

Is the only option for responding to posts in this group to receive ALL of the messages posted in this group by email?

On Sat, 24 Oct 2015, Johnny Hughes wrote: > On 10/23/2015 03:44 PM, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: >> What FUD? It adds *binary* logfiles, readable only with a separate >> program; when I restart a service, it does not *tell* me what's going on, >> just worked or didn't, so I don't know, if it fails, where, the messages >> from journalctl are extremely

>> >> I highly recommend the following site: I intentionally deleted the dangerous link that was previously posted here. >Sure. >And take the next time more time to explain why you recommend it. >Mostly because to get beyond a moderator of this mailinglist. > >In other words: >Stappers considered the blut URL dropping as spam. >He flagged the posting E-mail

On 02/03/2014 04:10 AM, Ilia Mirkin wrote: > Hi Alexandre, > > On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 10:16 PM, Alexandre Courbot <acourbot at nvidia.com> wrote: >> I guess my email address might surprise some of you, so let me anticipate some >> questions you might have. :P Yes, this work is endorsed by NVIDIA. Several other >> NVIDIAns (CC'd), including core GPU experts,

>>"Never use a browser for email." I don't agree. In fact, using a browser for email or atleast initial setup, is actually more secure. This because SMTP/IMAP clients normally don't support 2FA, so you would have to "hack" a solution to enable 2FA for email. This can be made in 2 ways: Either, you have a full fledged email setup. Whats important, is, to prevent

The following patches introduce support for multipath and cciss devices to the ovirt-node and node-image. Comments are appreciated. These patches assume that the 3 patches (2 node, 1 node-image) from Joey are all incorporated. Mike

Hi all, Recently there has been a flurry of spam to this mailing list. I'm considering switching the list to "subscriber post only" as a result. If you send from and receive to different addresses (like I do, for example), you need to subscribe your send-from address as a "no mail" address. Would people object to this scheme? -hpa

> From: Thomas Lumley [mailto:tlumley at u.washington.edu] > > Please don't send these messages to r-announce. r-announce is for > announcements. Isn't r-announce supposed to be moderated? I posted to r-announce about a minor update in randomForest and was rejected. I was told that it's meant for new or significant upgrades in packages, etc. Andy

Dears all, I was testing my localusers facter by puppetmaster fileserver but i''d got in error Could not retrieve localusers: No such file or directory - /etc/ puppet/whitelist I was pretending the file was served by fileserver of puppetmaster doing in init.pp : file { "/etc/puppet/whitelist": ensure => present, Just before to call a facter. I

On Aug 14, 2008, at 9:49 PM, Andy Kitchen wrote: FYI, all posts to llvmdev are moderated until the person posts something sensible. This is a PITA for me (llvm mailing lists get dozens of spams a day which require moderation), but is generally very effective. Since Andy had already posted something sensible, he was on the whitelist. However, he just lost the ability to post to llvmdev

On 24 March 2018 at 03:03, Corinna Vinschen <vinschen at redhat.com> wrote: [...] > session opened for local user corinna from [UNKNOWN] > received client version 3 > debug2: Permitting whitelisted realpath request > debug3: request 1: realpath > realpath "." > debug1: request 1: sent names count 1 > Refusing non-whitelisted statvfs request >