Displaying 20 results from an estimated 4000 matches similar to: "Re: migrate & virtlockd"
2013 Oct 21
1
Re: upstart script for virtlockd
Hi Eric,
Here is my try to write a quick upstart script for virtlockd.
It should be named /etc/init/virtlockd.conf, then : ln -s /lib/init/upstart-job /etc/init.d/virtlockd
It seems to work for me :
# virtlockd - Locking daemon for libvirt
description "virtlockd"
start on filesystem and runlevel [2345]
stop on starting rc RUNLEVEL=[016]
pre-start script
test -x
2013 Oct 14
0
migrate & virtlockd
Hi all,
I'm testing virtlockd with libvirt 1.1.3 and it seems I can't migrate my VMs from the first to my second kvm node (on a NFS storage). Virtlockd is locking my qcow2 :
Error : resource busy Lockspace resource 'ea3jkj78.....' is locked
As a result my VM is paused.
How can I fix this behavior ?
Thank you for your help.
2014 Dec 08
0
libgfapi disk locking in virtlockd not working
Hello.
I'm playing with libgfapi network disks, over IB and all is working
fine, but not disk locking (and true rdma transport).
I use virtlockd, and with fuse mount, locking works as expected.
But when i converted disk definitions to libgfapi, locks are not created
(but qemu starts and works fine). I used direct and indirect locking -
same result : qemu working fine, no locks.
my
2013 Oct 11
0
Re: upstart script for virtlockd
On 10/11/2013 03:25 AM, NEVEU Stephane wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Trying to test libvirt 1.1.3 with virtlockd locking my qcow2 images on a NFS storage between two kvm hosts.
> ./configure ... --with-init-script=upstart
>
> Libvirtd upstart script is actually well generated but I can't see nothing about virtlockd... or am I blind ? :)
It looks like virtlockd was added after
2013 Oct 11
2
upstart script for virtlockd
Hi all,
Trying to test libvirt 1.1.3 with virtlockd locking my qcow2 images on a NFS storage between two kvm hosts.
./configure ... --with-init-script=upstart
Libvirtd upstart script is actually well generated but I can't see nothing about virtlockd... or am I blind ? :)
Nevertheless, running virtlockd -d && service libvirtd restart works fine.
Am I wrong thinking that editing
2013 Nov 07
4
Re: RBD images locking
Eric,
Well, in case where several servers may start the same virtual machines after a reboot for exemple.
http://lists.ceph.com/pipermail/ceph-users-ceph.com/2013-August/003887.html
I've seen this hook here : http://www.wogri.at/en/linux/ceph-libvirt-locking/
But it's a hook...
Yes, I may try to write a patch. My coding skills are surely not as good as yours but I 'd be glad to make
2013 Nov 08
1
Re: RBD images locking
On Thu, Nov 07, 2013 at 09:08:58AM -0700, Eric Blake wrote:
> On 11/07/2013 09:04 AM, NEVEU Stephane wrote:
> > Eric,
>
> [please don't top-post on technical lists]
>
> >
> > Well, in case where several servers may start the same virtual machines after a reboot for exemple.
> > http://lists.ceph.com/pipermail/ceph-users-ceph.com/2013-August/003887.html
2014 Oct 13
0
Re: Virt-v2v conversion issue
Richard,
After un moment I have to force the unmount volume on /tmp umount -f /tmp/v2v.Nj0eik and I have this message :
qemu-img: error while writing sector 246526903: Input/output error
virt-v2v: error: qemu-img command failed, see earlier errors
Alain
Alain VONDRA
Chargé d'exploitation des Systèmes d'Information
Direction Administrative et Financière
+33 1 44 39 77 76
UNICEF
2013 May 06
1
virtlockd, init script and kill signals
Hi,
I've read in the documentation that virtlockd uses SIGUSR1 to dump its
state and then re-execs itself.
Now I tried it and this seems to fail because virtlockd is being
launched without a full path (when using the init script), thus re-exec
fails with the error:
error : virLockDaemonPreExecRestart:1092 : Unable to restart self: No
such file or directory
Changing in the init script
2013 Nov 07
0
Re: RBD images locking
On 11/07/2013 09:04 AM, NEVEU Stephane wrote:
> Eric,
[please don't top-post on technical lists]
>
> Well, in case where several servers may start the same virtual machines after a reboot for exemple.
> http://lists.ceph.com/pipermail/ceph-users-ceph.com/2013-August/003887.html
Isn't the existing virtlockd support already sufficient for this? If
not, what is preventing the
2020 Jan 03
0
Re: Locking without virtlockd (nor sanlock)?
Il 03-01-2020 11:26 Daniel P. Berrangé ha scritto:
> virtlockd also uses fcntl(), however, it doesn't have to acquire locks
> on
> the file/block device directly. It can use a look-aside file for
> locking.
> For example a path under /var/lib/libvirt/lock. This means that locks
> on
> block devices for /dev/sda1 would be held as
>
2020 Jan 03
2
Re: Locking without virtlockd (nor sanlock)?
On Fri, Jan 03, 2020 at 02:56:50PM +0100, Gionatan Danti wrote:
> Il 03-01-2020 11:26 Daniel P. Berrangé ha scritto:
> > virtlockd also uses fcntl(), however, it doesn't have to acquire locks
> > on
> > the file/block device directly. It can use a look-aside file for
> > locking.
> > For example a path under /var/lib/libvirt/lock. This means that locks on
>
2019 Dec 28
0
Re: Locking without virtlockd (nor sanlock)?
Il 28-12-2019 01:39 Gionatan Danti ha scritto:
> Hi list,
> I would like to ask a clarification about how locking works. My test
> system is CentOS 7.7 with libvirt-4.5.0-23.el7_7.1.x86_64
>
> Is was understanding that, by default, libvirt does not use any locks.
> From here [1]: "The out of the box configuration, however, currently
> uses the nop lock manager
2020 Jan 06
0
Re: Locking without virtlockd (nor sanlock)?
On Fri, Jan 03, 2020 at 14:08:03 +0000, Daniel Berrange wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 03, 2020 at 02:56:50PM +0100, Gionatan Danti wrote:
> > Il 03-01-2020 11:26 Daniel P. Berrangé ha scritto:
[...]
> > > There are some issues with libvirt's locking though where we haven't
> > > always released/re-acquired locks at the correct time when dealing
> > > with block
2020 Jan 07
0
Re: Locking without virtlockd (nor sanlock)?
On Mon, Jan 06, 2020 at 18:44:31 +0100, Gionatan Danti wrote:
> Il 06-01-2020 10:06 Peter Krempa ha scritto:
> > On Fri, Jan 03, 2020 at 14:08:03 +0000, Daniel Berrange wrote:
> > > As above, QEMU's locking is good enough to rely on for file based
> > > images.
>
> Hi Daniel, thank you for the direct confirmation.
>
> > > The flaws I mention with
2020 Jan 03
2
Re: Locking without virtlockd (nor sanlock)?
On Sat, Dec 28, 2019 at 02:36:27PM +0100, Gionatan Danti wrote:
> Il 28-12-2019 01:39 Gionatan Danti ha scritto:
> > Hi list,
> > I would like to ask a clarification about how locking works. My test
> > system is CentOS 7.7 with libvirt-4.5.0-23.el7_7.1.x86_64
> >
> > Is was understanding that, by default, libvirt does not use any locks.
> > From here [1]:
2018 Jul 03
1
Breaking a virtlockd lock?
I have several Qemu/kvm servers running VMs hosted on an NFS share, and am
using virtlockd. (lock_manager = "lockd" in qemu.conf) After a power
failure, one of the VMs will not start, claiming that it is locked. How do
I get out of this?
thanks,
Steve Gaarder
System Administrator, Dept of Mathematics
Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA
gaarder@math.cornell.edu
2020 Jan 06
2
Re: Locking without virtlockd (nor sanlock)?
Il 06-01-2020 10:06 Peter Krempa ha scritto:
> On Fri, Jan 03, 2020 at 14:08:03 +0000, Daniel Berrange wrote:
>> As above, QEMU's locking is good enough to rely on for file based
>> images.
Hi Daniel, thank you for the direct confirmation.
>> The flaws I mention with libvirt might actually finally be something
>> we
>> have fixed in 5.10.0 with QEMU 4.2.0,
2020 Jun 09
0
Re: Disable virtlockd
On Mon, Jun 08, 2020 at 16:26:44 +0200, Felix Queißner wrote:
> Hello!
Hi,
>
> Is it possible to disable the virtlockd daemon
Yes. via the 'lock_manager' option in /etc/libvirt/qemu.conf
>or VM file locking? I
If you mean the image locking provided by qemu, then no, libvirt doesn't
have provisions to disable it.
> start qemu with a -snapshot option which prevents
2020 Jun 08
2
Disable virtlockd
Hello!
Is it possible to disable the virtlockd daemon or VM file locking? I
start qemu with a -snapshot option which prevents and changes to the
disk image anyways.
Using <readonly /> is not supported for IDE disks.
Another option would be to not require locking on the NFS share, but i
have no idea how.
Can someone help me with that?
Regards
Felix Queißner