similar to: Strange connectivity issues with bridged networking and masquerade

On 23/08/13 15:02, Kolja Scheffler wrote: > I don't know if it's really libvirt-related but perhaps someone > here has an idea what to try. Any advice on this is really > appreciated, as I am at my wits' end. Thank you in advance... :) I had issues with kvm and linux-bridge and the 3.x kernel in Debian, can you try the 2.6 kernel in oldstable/security-updates. People

Hi all, I am now trying to find a solution to my problem for quite some time. I hope you can help. What I am trying to do is to simply sync files with a special suffix to a destination folder. So I dont want to transfer recursively but I want to delete files from the destination which are not in the source anymore. Closest I have gotten is using this command: /usr/bin/rsync -dnolptgvze --delete

# xm create -c vm01.cfg Error: Cannot open config file "vm01.cfg" www:/var/log/xen# xm create -c /etc/xen/auto/vm01.cfg Using config file "/etc/xen/auto/vm01.cfg". Error: (22, 'Invalid argument') # xm log [2006-10-24 16:16:30 xend.util.security 29229] INFO (__init__:1072) Resource label file not found. [2006-10-24 16:16:30 xend.util.security 29229] INFO

How does one install a new vm behind a proxy? When I start the virt-install routine Xen seems to be unable to load information from the ftp/http sources. As a consequence, I tried to install from the DVD-iso as well as the file system. Xen then prompts "What type of media contains the packages to be installed?". After choosing ''hard drive'' it prompts that I do not seem

Package: xen-hypervisor-3.0-i386 Version: 3.0.2+hg9681-1 Severity: important Have been trying to get NetBSD to run under debian unstable with the debian supplied hypervisor. Using the 3.0.2-2 hypervisor supplied by XenSource, it works just fine. Because the install process overrides other things, reverified with debian hypervisor afterwards and symptom continues. Attaching the netbsd.cfg and the

----- Forwarded message from pakrat <pakrat@private.neotoma.org> ----- Forwarding to list without attachments. From: pakrat <pakrat@private.neotoma.org> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org> Subject: xen-hypervisor-3.0-i386: cannot start NetBSD-HEAD X-Neotoma-Consulting-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-Neotoma-Consulting-MailScanner-From:

I am using the following commands to restrict download on an interface vm01 /sbin/tc qdisc add dev vm01 root handle 11: cbq bandwidth 100Mbit avpkt 1000 mpu 64 /sbin/tc class add dev vm01 parent 11:0 classid 11:1 cbq rate 1.5Kbit weight 1.5Kbit allot 1514 prio 1 avpkt 1000 bounded /sbin/tc filter add dev vm01 parent 11:0 protocol ip handle 4 fw flowid 11:1 When i do a qdisc show and class show,

Dear all I use the command( xm mem-set ID mem ) trying to understand the memory allocation between the Dom0 and the Guests(vm), but there is still some confusion about this. As the above /proc/xen/balloon list I set xm mem-set Domain-0 128 and changing the vm memory from 256 to 128: xm mem-set vm01 128 (...from vm01 to vm08) before mem-setCurrent allocation: 427792 kB

Hello, I must be missing something very very basic. Because I am having trouble launching some vm''s that I recently built whereas I don''t have any problem at all launching some older images I made in very much the same way! First there is vm01 which works just fine: [root@lcent5-1:/etc/xen]$:xm create vm01 Using config file "./vm01". Started domain vm01

Hello, I must be missing something very very basic. Because I am having trouble launching some vm''s that I recently built whereas I don''t have any problem at all launching some older images I made in very much the same way! First there is vm01 which works just fine: [root@lcent5-1:/etc/xen]$:xm create vm01 Using config file "./vm01". Started domain vm01

I can ssh into the Xen box over my LAN from another machine and I am logged in as vm01. But when I try to ssh in from work I can''t. I configured my router and I still cannot ssh into vm01. I know the sshd daemon is running because I can ssh locally. What could it be preventing me to ssh to vm01 remotely?? Thanks. Kashif _______________________________________________

Hello ! I yesterday updated one server to XEN 3.2 which was running 3.1.2 before. The default bridge setup stopped working (Guests network packets were not forwarded to physical ethernet connection on eth0) My bridge setup looked like this: root@quadxeon2:~# brctl show bridge name bridge id STP enabled interfaces eth0 8000.003048359fc0 no

Hello everybody, I''m new to Xen so forgive me if this is already well known issue. I''m using Ubuntu server 7.04 (feisty) with Xen 3.0.3 Everything works perfectly, apart from networking in NAT mode. With bridging it works, with NAT it works, well, quite strange. Namely, pings go through and name resolution works. But when I try to use anything substantial, then

Hi Everyone! My knowledge of tc is very much limited and i got introduced to it by my need for traffic limiting on xen based VM''s. For every VM there is a interface. The network is a bridged network. Has any one tried out something like this ? I tried the below script to limit download on an interface however it didn''t seem to work. Still the interface is able to download at

KVM version 84 Host OS: Centos version: 2.6.18-92.el5 Guest OS: Windows Server 2008 Web Processor: Intel Xeon L5420 Quad-Core I have installed kvm version 84 from .rpm's on lfarkas.org. Without the --no-acpi option, Windows 2008 boots fine. With the --no-acpi option, the VM displays the following: Windows Boot Manager Windows failed to start... Status 0xc0000225 Info: Windows failed to

Laine I made the change and I can now ping across both bridges: br1 (192.168.0.0/24) and br1600 (192.168.1.0/24): br1: flags=4163<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST>  mtu 1500         inet 192.168.0.110  netmask 255.255.255.0  broadcast 192.168.0.255         inet6 fe80::1e98:ecff:fe1b:276d  prefixlen 64  scopeid 0x20<link>         ether 1c:98:ec:1b:27:6d  txqueuelen 1000  (Ethernet)

Even more puzzling, I reverted back to the old configuration to confirm what I had seen and found that it works in one direction but not the other: i.e. from 192.168.0.110 to 192.168.0.120, but not the other way around. Must be something with my configuration....which I can follow up on. So, thanks again for your help. Richard On 12/3/19 11:36 AM, Richard Achmatowicz wrote: > Laine >

hi all, (this events ocurred before my previous mail about the uuid incident) so, I installed a vm host: rhel6 guest: centos6 network: bridge (br0, eth1 as slave) but then, I changed the name of the bridge from br0 to br1 (because br1<->eth1 seems pretty than br0<->eth1) so: - mv /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-br0 /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-br1 - edited

Hello, i have had a terribe day today, why? because i have been so 4 or 5 hours trying to do work this and i have not finished it. I feel very pleased if anything can help me. I have two isp connections: eth0: dhcp ip1: 82.198.*.* gw1: 82.198.*.* and a router adsl in ip 192.168.0.253: eth1: static ip2: 192.168.0.254 gw1: 192.168.0.253 the same machine has 3 more networks cards but i am

> People recommended me to use openvswitch instead of linux-bridge-utils with a > 3.x kernel. Thanks for the reply. I think I'll give openvswitch a try and report back the results. > _______________________________________________ > libvirt-users mailing list > libvirt-users@redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvirt-users