similar to: Mail problems? Need help finding this process!

R 2.8.1 Windows XP I am trying to plot the results of a coxph using plot(survfit()). The plot should, I believe, show two lines one for survival in each of two treatment (Drug) groups, however my plot shows only one line. What am I doing wrong? My code is reproduced below, my figure is attached to this EMail message. John > #Create simple survival object >

I suppose it's more of a frustration with myself, but can some kind soul please help me with the procedure to tell yum a package is in fact installed? Here is the output from the command "yum update". # yum update Setting up Update Process Setting up repositories kbs-CentOS-Extras 100% |=========================| 951 B 00:00 kbs-CentOS-Misc 100%

Once upon a time, Kenneth Porter <shiva at sewingwitch.com> said: > Perfect. I think the only other significant customizations I have > are lines to use the MIMEDefang and OpenDKIM milters. When last I > looked into migrating, I recall that Postfix handled milters just > fine. Milters work a little different under postfix IIRC... I haven't tried them (which is a little sad,

I've been running sendmail since the beginning of my online time. 1. Did I see that postfix can run sendmail milters? 2. If so, did I read that postfix can run these separately for inbound vs. outbound? 3. Can it run like a rbl blacklist on inbound and not outbound? 4. If the above is true, does this require separate configurations of postfix or is it already set to allow this out of the

Strangest thing. Since some time Marts 25. I'm no longer receiving mails from the dovecot mailing list server. Mails from other sources are behaving fine. Instead I'm just seing Mar 26 08:27:54 dna01 postfix/smtpd[107746]: Anonymous TLS connection established from talvi.dovecot.org[94.237.25.159]: TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits) Mar 26 08:27:54 dna01

Okay, Yahoo is bumming me. Only system my mail is having an issue with. All mail is accepted, but junked. I can only think it is the DKIM/Domain keys. It is apparent that the dkim-milter is not part of the centos 5.x distro nor is it part of the mirrors, as far as I can tell. So...have any of you done it with your servers for sendmail? There are some sites that claim to have rpms and I have

Hello all, About a year ago I set up a mail server on CentOS using this howto: http://wanderingbarque.com/howtos/mailserver/mailserver.html I managed to add amavisd-new with clamav and spamassassin. It runs very well, but it runs on CentOS 5.2, and if I try to upgrade, amavisd-new and clamav break. we are now also at the point where a backup mx will need to be implemented. If necessary I am

Am 12.06.2020 um 02:03 schrieb Ralph Seichter: > * Andreas Born: > >> There exists one problem: at this stage of mail reception you have no >> body content nor header information on which a milter may perform >> deeper analysis, only envelope data. > > I am not sure what you mean by "this stage of mail reception", or what I meant the different stages when

Well, I stumbled onto zimbra.... I have a Scallix system built, but still have some rough edges to try to smooth. Like the way it works with sendmail, no dnsbl's will work as sendmail sees all mail as coming from locohost (scalix). Still battling that one which is when I ran across Zimbra. So, this made me start wondering. Are there other exchange server-like products out there? Has

Am 26.01.2015 um 10:52 schrieb St?phane Cottin: >> Le 26 janv. 2015 ? 10:09, Reindl Harald <h.reindl at thelounge.net> a ?crit : >>>> You're stilling going to lose contents. If dspam fails, the mail >>>> is dumped, the LDA returns exit code 75, and the MTA will probably >>>> issue a bounce Email to the sender. >>> >>> which

Hello all, I've been trying to get spamassassin and clamav working, but got really confused when I realized there are various incarnations of the software. Originally, I started out with just spamassassin, but learned there is also an SA-milter. Can someone tell me which of the various spam fighting packages i.e., sa, sa-milter, clamav, clamave-milter, and so forth? I ran into

On 21/09/19 9:07 AM, Chris Adams wrote: > Once upon a time, Kenneth Porter <shiva at sewingwitch.com> said: >> Perfect. I think the only other significant customizations I have >> are lines to use the MIMEDefang and OpenDKIM milters. When last I >> looked into migrating, I recall that Postfix handled milters just >> fine. > > Milters work a little different

Hi all, I'm trying to add some milters (particularly spamass-milter and clamav-milter, which I acquired through rpmforge) to my postfix configuration on Centos5 with the targeted SELinux policy.. I'm running into difficulty getting postfix to communicate through the unix domain sockets created by the milters, because selinux keeps blocking them. I've attempted to use audit2allow

Once upon a time, Kenneth Porter <shiva at sewingwitch.com> said: > How would you implement the section here titled "Sendmail > workaround" using Postfix? http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#recipient_delimiter -- Chris Adams <linux at cmadams.net>

Fixed, we had smtp_security_level=verify, which I forgot to remove when we removed the relay server we used. Now it should work. Aki On 28.3.2019 13.59, Christian Anthon via dovecot wrote: > Strangest thing. Since some time Marts 25. I'm no longer receiving > mails from the dovecot mailing list server. Mails from other sources > are behaving fine. > > Instead I'm just

dear All, I am jus installed centOS 5.0 from the distrubution to be as our mail server i have installed the following sendmail-8.13.8-2.el5 mailsacnner 4.61.7 spamassassin 3.2.1 clamav-0.91-1.el5.rf and every thing is workin fine but i want to implement domain keys so i downloaded the dkim-milter-1.2.0 and uncompress it edited the site.config.m4 file n folled intructions in the

Dear All, I am curently running a CENTOS server with the following setup CentOS release 5 (Final) Kernel 2.6.18-8.1.8.el5xen on an i686 bind-9.3.3-10.el5 sendmail-8.13.8-2.el5 apache httpd-2.2.3-11.el5_1.centos.3 MailScanner ver 4.66.5 ClamAV 0.92 SpamAssassin version 3.2.4 SquirrelMail ver 1.4.13 Now all this have been workin perfectly fine for a long time. now if i do a yum upgrade i see the

In the same vein, I am receiving forensic DMARC reports from mx01.nausch.org. Whenever I send a message to the mailing list or when my server sends a DMARC report, I'm getting a DMARC Forensic report. It's odd, because the actual report tells me both DKIM and SPF (in the the of a DMARC report) pass... Here is what I am getting : This is an authentication failure report for an email

* Andreas Born: > I meant the different stages when receiving mails over SMTP [...] I am well aware of the technical details of SMTP. Your comment is unclear to me because the OP did not make any limitations on when he wants to counter spam, so why would we artificially limit ourselves in this discussion? SMTP allows rejecting messages even after the whole body has been received (end of DATA

Hi, I'm currently busy with a substiution of my current mail server. I'm currently using * Clam-SMTP and * SpamAssassin to fight Spam. I wonder if it is worth implementing AmaViS with SpamAssassin backend instead and also using AmaViS to speak to clamd directly. But I more and more wonder wether AmaViS is even worth it?! It currently looks to me as if AmaViS is eating LOTS of