similar to: [Bug 1428] New: Unable to dnat to port without defining destination address in inet table

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1073 Bug ID: 1073 Summary: inet-service vs icmp conflict Product: nftables Version: unspecified Hardware: x86_64 OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: nft Assignee: pablo at netfilter.org Reporter:

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=514 Richard Clark <richardc at cybrick.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED CC| |richardc at cybrick.com Resolution|DUPLICATE

I am trying to override variables in a class that is defined in the default node profile. I want parent class to be included in every single node, but override its variables in others. I have tried it several different ways now, and every single time the variables either become unset (undefined) or are set to the value of the first if statement. Here is my current iteration of failure.

On September 5, Tom wrote: > In Shorewall 4.2, you can leave the ''loc:'' out of the DNAT- rule. I tried that just now (shorewall-perl 4.2.1), and I got an error: Checking... WARNING: Destination zone (172.29.0.29) ignored : /etc/shorewall/rules (line 38) ERROR: Unknown Host (0.0.0.0/0) : /etc/shorewall/rules (line 38) where 172.29.0.29 is the destination address on

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=514 Summary: Making DNAT --to-destination resolve service named of port Product: netfilter/iptables Version: linux-2.6.x Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P2 Component: ip_tables (kernel)

Hi! The Netfilter project proudly presents: nftables 0.8 This release contains new features available up to the (upcoming) Linux 4.14 kernel release: * Support for stateful objects, these objects are uniquely identified by a user-defined name, you can refer to them from rules, and there is a well established interface to operate with them, eg. # nft add counter filter test

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=850 Summary: DNAT applied even after deleting the IP Tables DNAT Rule Product: iptables Version: 1.4.x Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: P5 Component: iptables AssignedTo: netfilter-buglog at

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=514 Phil Oester <netfilter at linuxace.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|laforge at netfilter.org |netfilter-buglog at lists.netf | |ilter.org -- Configure

Hi all, net : internet zone dmz : DMZ zone Lan : local network zone in 1.4.6c this rule : DNAT all lan:10.0.0.1 tcp http - 192.0.0.1 does generate the following iptables rules in nat table : Chain OUTPOUT DNAT tcp -- 0.0.0.0/0 192.0.0.1 tcp dpt:http to:10.0.0.1 Chain net_dnat DNAT tcp -- 0.0.0.0/0 192.0.0.1 tcp dpt:http to:10.0.0.1 Chain dmz_dnat

Hi, The private adresses (192.168.254.0/255.255.255.0) of my network are sent dynamically by dhcp on my network. The dhcp server is on the firewall which address is 192.168.254.1/255.255.255.255 (this address is static). I''ve got a rsync server on this network which is on a separe server. His address is 192.168.254.200/255.255.255.255 (this address is static). I want that the users

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=471 Summary: UDP stream DNAT problem Product: netfilter/iptables Version: linux-2.6.x Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: NAT AssignedTo: laforge@netfilter.org ReportedBy:

I have been trying to get DNAT to work and I actually have succeeded too, however, not how I thought it would work when reading through the documentation. 1. No matter what I do I cannot get DNAT to work unless I have an entry in eiter the nat or the proxyarp file. Is that really how it''s supposed to be? I can''t find anything about it in the documentation. 2. Also, in the

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1423 Bug ID: 1423 Summary: iptables-translate silently discards --ctstate DNAT Product: nftables Version: unspecified Hardware: x86_64 OS: Debian GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: iptables over nftable

Hi, i''m a shorewall users and i have the following problem: I have one class C range of IP''s and i have three zones (net, dmz , loc) I need create one rule to dnat one valid ip address (but not in use in one computer) to one invalid host in my loc zone. How i do? I try this: DNAT net:200.200.200.200 dmz:200.193.137.38 tcp 137,138,139,445 -

I need to access externally (via Internet) one device in internal network which has no default gateway configured. As the device doesn''t have default gateway, the response to SYN (ie, SYN/ACK) don''t come back to Internet. What I need is a setup to make this connection appears to come from firewall''s internal IP address instead of the public IP of originating requester

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1056 Bug ID: 1056 Summary: nft: Syntax error with dnat as ct state Product: nftables Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: nft Assignee: pablo at netfilter.org

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1160 Bug ID: 1160 Summary: dnat ip address not shown in nft list output when using port value Product: nftables Version: unspecified Hardware: x86_64 OS: Fedora Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: nft

Hi, after kernel upgrade to 2.4.23 my existing configuration of shorewal 1.4.8 will not start / it fail on DNAT and/or masq with message: "iptables: Invalid argument" / I founded some similar problems description - see links bellow, but there is no solution how to get work shorewall with DNAT and masq with 2.4.23 kernel. http://www.ussg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0312.0/0268.html

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=452 Summary: DNAT to internal network don't work with source routing and 2 uplinks Product: netfilter/iptables Version: linux-2.6.x Platform: i386 OS/Version: Debian GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2

Hi This is an odd question. But here it is. I have two hosts both with two nicks physically in two different countries. One host I have DNAT set up on such that all traffic is forwarded to the second host. iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -d 0.0.0.0 -j DNAT --to-destination second_host_ip But what I am trying to imagine is how can I get the second host to un-DNAT the traffic from the