similar to: [Bug 1413] New: Inconsistent EBUSY errors when adding a duplicate element to a map

Hi! The Netfilter project proudly presents: nftables 0.6 This release contains many accumulated bug fixes and new features availale up to the Linux 4.7-rc1 kernel release. New features ============ * Rule replacement: You can replace any rule from the unique 64-bits handle. You have to retrieve the handle from the ruleset listing. # nft list ruleset -a table ip filter { chain

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1201 Bug ID: 1201 Summary: Some filters randomly do not work since version 0.8 Product: nftables Version: unspecified Hardware: x86_64 OS: Gentoo Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: P5 Component: nft Assignee: pablo at

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1360 Bug ID: 1360 Summary: BUG: invalid expression type concat on invalid input "iifname . oifname p . q" Product: nftables Version: unspecified Hardware: x86_64 OS: Debian GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=872 Summary: extra symbols in console output Product: nftables Version: unspecified Platform: x86_64 OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: nft AssignedTo: pablo at netfilter.org ReportedBy: loki at lokis-chaos.de

>From netdev@oss.sgi.com: ----- Forwarded message from jamal <hadi@cyberus.ca> ----- X-Original-To: sebek@localhost X-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2004 03:25:37 +0200 (CEST) Subject: (Long) ANNOUNCE: IMQ replacement WAS(Re: [RFC/PATCH] IMQ port to 2.6 From: jamal <hadi@cyberus.ca> Reply-To: hadi@cyberus.ca To: "Vladimir B. Savkin" <master@sectorb.msk.ru> Cc:

Hello i have some problems on 2.6.14 kernel dummy and iproute :) i have server with 2 nics : eth0 <> inet eth1 <> lan dummy0 (i want to shape incoming traffic from lan machine on this interface) my config: tc qdisc del dev dummy0 root tc qdisc add dev dummy0 root handle 1: htb tc class add dev dummy0 parent 1: classid 1:1 htb rate 100kbit ceil 100kbit tc class add dev dummy0

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1253 Bug ID: 1253 Summary: interface wildcard in variables causes Error: Byteorder mismatch: expected big endian, got host endian Product: nftables Version: unspecified Hardware: x86_64 OS: All Status: NEW Severity:

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1284 Bug ID: 1284 Summary: nft doesn't accept interface names starting with a number Product: nftables Version: unspecified Hardware: x86_64 OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component: nft

> > 3. why not use ssh -X -l <thotheruserIwantedsuto?> <thehost>? > Maybe, because -l root ain't that nice? > Philipp Sorry for refering so late to a (securityfocus) post, but the Subject has been nagging me for the last month ;-) Problem was how to keep your DISPLAY, xauth and security (no 'ssh root at host' over the net) when changing users remotely

No. Network Manager is always disabled on our builds since at least Cent5 days. The network stack has always been able to be managed properly without relying on Network Manager. Is that now an absolute requirement? It never has been prior. On Mon, Oct 26, 2020 at 6:26 PM Strahil Nikolov via CentOS <centos at centos.org> wrote: > > Have you tried to use NetworkManager ? > After

Requirement is a very strong word , but you should consider using it and here is a short demo why: - By default, RHEL uses NetworkManager to configure and manage network connections, and the /usr/sbin/ifup and /usr/sbin/ifdown scripts use NetworkManager to process ifcfg files in the /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ directory. [root at system ~]# ls -l /usr/sbin/ifup lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 22 21

Have you tried to use NetworkManager ? After all ,anything network related should be done by it. [root at system ~]# nmcli connection add con-name dummy0 ifname dummy0 type dummy ? Connection 'dummy0' (9fdd74fa-c143-4991-9bac-0e542704ac89) successfully added. [root at system ~]# reboot Shared connection to glustera closed. [root at system ~]# uptime 03:23:44 up 0 min, ?1 user, ?load

A site I administer has dual T1''s. We have this set up according to NANO-HOWTO[1] using Julian''s routes patch on a late model 2.4 kernel. All is well, has been working well for a long time. Recently one of our T1 providers went belly up and we got something better. Now we have a /28 where previously we only used one IP per interface. Present interfaces: eth0 - T1#1, single

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=954 Summary: iffname doesn't work with sets. Product: nftables Version: unspecified Platform: x86_64 OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component: nft AssignedTo: pablo at netfilter.org ReportedBy: anarey at

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1195 Bug ID: 1195 Summary: 'list ruleset' of 'nft -f' outputs garbage while 'nft list ruleset' seems to work. Product: nftables Version: unspecified Hardware: x86_64 OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement

Whilst ip= command is documented to support dns0:dns1 options as arguments 7 and 8, the -d parser in ipconfig does not. This breaks bringing up static ip configuration with dns nameservers set in the ip= command. Testcase: $ ip link add name dummy0 type dummy $ sudo /usr/lib/klibc/bin/ipconfig -d 10.245.237.7::10.245.237.1:255.255.255.0:ottawa:dummy0:none:8.8.8.8:8.8.4.4 IP-Config: dummy0

Commit-ID: b86cd0ef3f225b0e68a7c49de2460829f6bfe2be Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/?p=libs/klibc/klibc.git;a=commit;h=b86cd0ef3f225b0e68a7c49de2460829f6bfe2be Author: Dimitri John Ledkov <xnox at ubuntu.com> AuthorDate: Wed, 17 Jul 2019 22:18:23 +0100 Committer: Ben Hutchings <ben at decadent.org.uk> CommitDate: Sun, 28 Jul 2019 20:12:38 +0100 [klibc] ipconfig: Implement

Hello, I am having big problems with Xen virtual network interfaces. First I tried typical bridge support, no luck. The packets sent from dom0 to domU seemed to disappear somewhere. Then, to debug the problem I have set up a simple point-to-point link and still have the same problem. I am using Xen 3.0.4-1 and Linux 2.6.16.x in both dom0 and domU. I have tried kernel 2.6.16.35 and 2.6.16.41. I

Hello! I am using xen some years now and it just runs without any problems. But now one customer needs a stupid WinXP domU and I am trying to get this running for about two weeks... I am using 2.6.26-2-xen-amd64 kernel, set up a dummy network auto dummy0 allow-hotplog dummy0 iface dummy0 inet static address 10.0.0.1 netmask 255.255.255.0 broadcast 10.0.0.255 xend-config: (network-script

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1302 Bug ID: 1302 Summary: iptables v1.8.0 (nf_tables) has a problem inverting in-interface and maybe out Product: iptables Version: CVS (please indicate timestamp) Hardware: x86_64 OS: All Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: