similar to: [Bug 1408] New: The Check option of iptables does not work as expected

Despite that the migration of our applications comes with a significant workload. It seems that also every aspect of common services had changed with EL8. In EL8 firewalld uses nftables as backend. I wonder why iptables does not list any rules while also configured to use nftables as backend. # iptables -V iptables v1.8.2 (nf_tables) # firewall-cmd --list-all |egrep -o '22|ssh' ssh

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1298 Bug ID: 1298 Summary: Issue with REJECT in custom chains Product: nftables Version: unspecified Hardware: x86_64 OS: Debian GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: iptables over nftable Assignee: pablo

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1422 Bug ID: 1422 Summary: iptables-nft fails to check / delete rules in raw table Product: iptables Version: 1.6.x Hardware: x86_64 OS: Debian GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: P5 Component: iptables

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1335 Bug ID: 1335 Summary: iptables-restore will crash if -6 rules are present Product: iptables Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: Debian GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: iptables-restore

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1362 Bug ID: 1362 Summary: iptables translation issues Product: nftables Version: unspecified Hardware: x86_64 OS: Debian GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component: iptables over nftable Assignee: pablo at

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1412 Bug ID: 1412 Summary: ip6tables-nft not accepting "icmp" as shorthand for "icmpv6" Product: nftables Version: unspecified Hardware: x86_64 OS: Debian GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: minor Priority: P5

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1348 Bug ID: 1348 Summary: v1.8.2 iptables-nft-restore incorrectly handles multiple replace commands Product: iptables Version: unspecified Hardware: x86_64 OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5

On Tue, Jun 09, 2020 at 02:19:17PM +0200, Leon Fauster via CentOS wrote: > > Despite that the migration of our applications comes with a significant > workload. It seems that also every aspect of common services had changed > with EL8. > > In EL8 firewalld uses nftables as backend. I wonder why iptables does not > list any rules while also configured to use nftables as

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1727 Bug ID: 1727 Summary: RIP: 0010:nft_set_elem_expr_destroy+0x30/0xb0 [nf_tables] Product: nftables Version: 1.0.x Hardware: x86_64 OS: Ubuntu Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: kernel

I am working on my first Ruby-on-Rails project after completing "cookbook" and "todo list" tutorials. When "SAVE"ing a new record to a table, the "create" method throws SQL error #42000 for: SELECT * FROM mailboxes WHERE (key = ''TEST'') LIMIT 1 but if i change syntax to fully-qualified column, the query tool is happy with: SELECT

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1313 Bug ID: 1313 Summary: proper return codes Product: nftables Version: unspecified Hardware: x86_64 OS: Debian GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: iptables over nftable Assignee: pablo at

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1359 Bug ID: 1359 Summary: nft 0.9.1 - table family inet, chain type nat, fails to auto-load modules Product: nftables Version: unspecified Hardware: x86_64 OS: other Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component:

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1302 Bug ID: 1302 Summary: iptables v1.8.0 (nf_tables) has a problem inverting in-interface and maybe out Product: iptables Version: CVS (please indicate timestamp) Hardware: x86_64 OS: All Status: NEW Severity: major Priority:

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1213 Bug ID: 1213 Summary: Nft stateless NAT (NOTRACK) Product: nftables Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: Ubuntu Status: NEW Severity: critical Priority: P5 Component: nft Assignee: pablo at netfilter.org Reporter:

I made the mistake of trying to upgrade to 1.8.4 from 1.8.2 and had intended to upgrade to rails 1.1. I have now completely borked my ruby gems installation. After installing ruby I get the following error when trying to execute gem: /usr/local/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rubygems/custom_require.rb:21:in `require__'': no such file to load -- zlib (LoadError) from

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1435 Bug ID: 1435 Summary: segfault when using iptables-nft and iptables-legacy inside a container Product: libnftnl Version: unspecified Hardware: x86_64 OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component:

I am getting an error when attempting to install RailsEditor-0.0.22[.gem]: parse error on line 0 col 31: ''!ruby/object:Gem::Specification '' using --local I downloaded the gem from the site... My workstation is running Windows XP box with ruby v1.8.2 (2004-12-25) [i386-mswin32] installed. if I attempt ''gem install rails --include-dependencies''... I get:

I finally upgraded to MoinMoin v1.8.2 from old v1.5.8. Let me know if something doesn't work right. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 197 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: <http://dovecot.org/pipermail/dovecot/attachments/20090315/0a7c20dc/attachment-0002.bin>

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1451 Bug ID: 1451 Summary: nft add element fails when preceded by nft get element or nft delete element commands Product: nftables Version: unspecified Hardware: x86_64 OS: Ubuntu Status: NEW Severity: blocker Priority: P5

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1476 Bug ID: 1476 Summary: xtables-monitor --trace segfaults running inside a container Product: bugzilla Version: other Hardware: x86_64 OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component: netfilter