similar to: [Bug 1158] New: using old session data when piping multiple commands

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70 Summary: udp connection(snmp) not being tracked. Product: netfilter/iptables Version: patch-o-matic Platform: All OS/Version: Debian GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: P2 Component: connection tracking AssignedTo:

With ssh tunnel (-L option), is it possible to set _remote_ bind address? Say, I have a remote SSH server with two IP addresses, 1.1.1.1 and 2.2.2.2. I would like to make sure that any outgoing connections to 3.3.3.3 will be made from 2.2.2.2: ssh client ---> 1.1.1.1 ssh server 2.2.2.2 >--- 3.3.3.3 Pseudo "--remote-bind" command here to illustrate what I mean: ssh -N -L

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=887 Summary: iptables.xslt wrong "match" -m handling Product: iptables Version: 1.4.x Platform: All OS/Version: Debian GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: P5 Component: unknown AssignedTo: netfilter-buglog at lists.netfilter.org

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1147 Bug ID: 1147 Summary: iptables rule to match a 'set' shows [unsupported revision] Product: iptables Version: unspecified Hardware: x86_64 OS: Debian GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5

http://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=763 Summary: dnat and snat not changing port numbers on sctp packets Product: netfilter/iptables Version: linux-2.6.x Platform: x86_64 OS/Version: RedHat Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: NAT AssignedTo: netfilter-buglog at

Hi, My problem is that when vacation auto-reply sent the field from=<> Because of this does not work "sender_dependent_relayhost_maps" in postfix. My scheme is: There are several postfix on different machines 1.1.1.1 - domain1 2.2.2.2 - domain2 3.3.3.3 - domain3 All they send messages to one server virtual_transport = lmtp:10.10.10.10:24 where mail is stored. In 10.10.10.10

I''ve found a similar thread here, but it doesn''t do quite what I need. https://groups.google.com/forum/?fromgroups=#!topic/puppet-users/VMloh1KrSew I have multiple lines of the form below in hosts.allow: sshd,sshd2: 1.1.1.1 sshd,sshd2: 2.2.2.2 etc. I''m struggling with the syntax to add yet another "sshd,sshd2: client" line to hosts.allow. augtool is

Hi I am trying to configure hosts.allow using augeas with puppet. I can add a ip range if process exists with this code augeas { "Add ${name} to ${process}": context => "/files/etc/hosts.allow", changes => "set *[process=''${process}'']/client[last()+1] ${name}", onlyif => "match

Hi, all I wanted to fetch data from Bloomberg for govt bonds, and analyse it further. I am having trouble in getting data as when I use field=PX_LAST, it is giving the prices but when I use field=CPN, or ISSUE_DT, it is not giving the results and just bouncing back <NA> for that. This is the piece of code: > library(rJava) Warning message: package 'rJava' was built

I have set up an Rsync server on FreeBSD 5.3 and plan on having windows clients synchronize data to it. Rsync running as a daemon works fine. I can successfully copy data up to the server and view it via scp. Also- I can connect via ssh and run rsync as well. HOWEVER- I cannot connect "passwordless" with SSH and then connect to the rsync daemon. The following demonstartes what I

Hello! I have access server with 4 uplinks (nice, huh?). I ran RedHat 7.3. Yesterday I did an upgrade to RedHat 9. After upgrade Linux says the third link is bad: # ip route show 2.2.2.0/30 dev eth2 scope link src 2.2.2.2 4.4.4.0/30 dev eth4 scope link src 4.4.4.4 3.3.3.0/29 dev eth3 scope link src 3.3.3.3 1.1.1.0/28 dev eth1 scope link src 1.1.1.1 10.1.1.0/24 dev eth0 scope link

My Google-Fu skills have failed me, I have not been able to find a solution to the problem I am facing. asterisk + from + asterisk + options + qualify != what I am looking for -- When qualify is enabled on a trunk, the From line shows "asterisk". See the SIP message below. I would like to keep qualify enabled without sending the other end any reference to "asterisk". Can

I am creating three u32 filters with different dst addresses. When I delete one of those filters, all three are deleted. Why all 3 filters are deleted even though in ''tc filter del'' command I give exactly all parameters of filters creation. Is this expected behaviour, that all other filters are deleted also ? Thanks Yakov Lerner Here is sample script that reproduces how

Excuse me form reposting the quesiton, but I didn''t find any solution. Any suggestion is welcome Hi, I''m running a Debian 2.2r2 on a university server with 3 public ip o(1.1.1.1 2.2.2.2 and 3.3.3.3 on one ethernet card (but soon we will have three cards). There''s a tunnel (implemented with vtund on a tun interface with local address 192.168.1.10 and remote

Hi! I have many problems getting this thing to work. There''s a host with two network interfaces, where there are two routers to Internet in two separated networks. The host uses multihop routing for deciding to which router send the packets... but the routing decision is wrong made. Some packets with source address of one NIC, go to other network. I have a host with three NICs in it:

CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2012:1158 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2012-1158.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386: 2b5c9b873b13791e680f11634f437f90c0302d0c2595c3fddaa5d7e01519db33 glibc-2.12-1.80.el6_3.4.i686.rpm

CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2015:1158 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2015-1158.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) x86_64: c047a6adb832371c25c4f321ee5aeb7acbe1467f9d9e149cc6f3ae38d22d6dc9 ruby-2.0.0.598-25.el7_1.x86_64.rpm

On Oct 22, I sent an empty bug report (#1138) because bug.report() "ate my message". Paul Gilbert opened a new bug report (#1158) for this problem. I'm now convinced it's because I had an apostrophe in the subject line ("round() doesn't"). The bug.report documentation specifically warns against this, but the bug.report() function could also check for it! I

Some of the Red Hat Enterprise Linux servers in our environment sometimes get assigned virtual IP addresses (eth0:1, eth0:2, etc). Puppet Dashboard''s parameters seem like an ideal way to define and provision virtual IPs on these servers. One could create a "vip1" parameter on a node, and define a value of the IP address to use for that vip. A manifest could then be written to

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1158 Summary: Setting the environment in authorized_keys does not work Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 3.9p1 Platform: ix86 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: sshd AssignedTo: bitbucket at mindrot.org