similar to: [Bug 1106] New: AT&T email support number 1 855-338-0710 at&t email error support phone number

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2634 Bug ID: 2634 Summary: KAKI KAKA PASS 1-855(338-0710) || outlook technical support number / (1 855)338+0710 outlook customer service Number Outlook Tech Support Number Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 7.2p2 Hardware: All OS: All

Hi Jeff, > > I notice `lli -print-machineinstrs -x86-asm-syntax=(att|intel)' both > > prefix registers with `%'. Is this right? I thought AT&T did this > > and Intel didn't. The GNU gas manual concurs. > > > > http://www.gnu.org/software/binutils/manual/gas-2.9.1/html_chapter/as_16.html > > The Intel version is just a clone of the

The Intel version is just a clone of the AT&T version at this time. No one has yet taken the time to make it produce actual Intel syntax. Ralph Corderoy wrote: > Hi, > > I notice `lli -print-machineinstrs -x86-asm-syntax=(att|intel)' both > prefix registers with `%'. Is this right? I thought AT&T did this and > Intel didn't. The GNU gas manual concurs. >

On Sat, 29 Apr 2006, Jeff Cohen wrote: > We know. Someone offered to do the Intel version, but did little more than a > huge cut and paste of the AT&T version and then lost interest. No one else > has had the time or inclination to finish the (barely begun) job. Patches > accepted :) Actually, that's not true. The LLVM X86 backend started out emitting intel mode for

Does anybody out there run * on an AT&T broadband phone line? I'm not seeing any callerid and I can't tell if its AT&T doing something funky or if its my setup. I do see CID on my normal phones.... Thanks, Chris -- The face of a child can say it all, especially the mouth part of the face. http://ccicolorado.org Exceptional Dogs for Exceptional People - Help Out Today!

Hello everyone, I'm hoping someone can help me with this. I have a business customer in the U.S. (Michigan, AT&T Territory). I need to get 4 trunks into an asterisk Box. My intention is to use an Eicon Diva Server card with 2 BRI Circuits. The reason for this is that the business needs DID's on the trunks (20 of them). A full or fractional PRI is overboard for them, as they will

On Sun, 30 Apr 2006, Jeff Cohen wrote: Jeff, many appologies. I slightly misread what you wrote, and came across more strongly that was appropriate: I'm sorry! :( :( > Let's see. Ralph correctly points out that LLVM isn't producing anything > like Intel syntax. ... This is not true. LLVM produces something very close to what GAS accepts in intel mode: that is, we

Hey All, AT&T is installing a PRI in a couple weeks and while I've been doing homework on PRI's for the last few weeks there's something I'm still confused about. After being asked how many digits I wanted them to send us (10) was how many digits will you outpulse to us, 4, 7 or 10? I asked her what that meant and all I got was the question repeated. Do any of you have

Hi, I notice `lli -print-machineinstrs -x86-asm-syntax=(att|intel)' both prefix registers with `%'. Is this right? I thought AT&T did this and Intel didn't. The GNU gas manual concurs. http://www.gnu.org/software/binutils/manual/gas-2.9.1/html_chapter/as_16.html Cheers, Ralph.

Hi, > It's a long way towards it: > > # AT&T. # Intel. > .text .text > .align 16 .align 16 > .globl main .globl main > .type main, @function > main: main: >

I'm running a CentOS-5.6 server, which in general runs perfectly. My setting is possibly a little unusual: ADSL -> Billion 5200S RC modem/router -> CentOS-5.6 HP MicroServer -> Linksys WRT54GL router . My daughter is just visiting me, and she has to contact her job using AT&T VPN on her laptop under Windows XP. Unfortunately this does not work on my system when connected to

Greetings, Does anyone know if there is a cost effective way to interface an older AT&T Spirit system into Asterisk. I'm only interested in A) being able to offer voicemail and B) possibly an AAT to callers. I've thought about just stringing the FXO cards into the line1/2 slots that go into the Spirit system... asterisk would pickup if no one answered the Spirit phones.... however....

Anyone here using Level 3 or AT&T wholesale sip terminations services? I would like to know on any minimums they would require? Also, an idea of how competitive the rates are. I am not asking to disclose your custom rate deck, just a "what to expect". Finally, if you guys can PM me contact info to someone from the wholesale department, I would really appreciate it. Kind Regards,

I retired from AT&T on July 1, 2003. Your message was forwaded automatically to ``ark at acm dot org'' (after replacing "at" by "@" and "dot" by ".", a circumlocution intended to forestall mail harvesting). Please use this address for future email to me. Regards, Andrew Koenig

On Mon, 1 May 2006, Ralph Corderoy wrote: >> The LLVM X86 backend started out emitting intel mode for use with GAS >> and it's "intel syntax mode" (which does use registers with %'s). >> Unfortunately GAS has (or commonly available versions have) a number >> of bugs in intel syntax mode (e.g. you can't define a function named >> 'dword'),

Hi guys, We are experiencing a problem with a T1 PRI connection. After trying a number of variations in the configuration files, the behavior is always the same: no B channels come up and the D channel doesn't appear to be working well. We can see there are AT&T Maintenance messages being exchanged by asterisk and the provider, CONNECT and CONNECT ACKNOWLEDGE, but that doesn't

We know. Someone offered to do the Intel version, but did little more than a huge cut and paste of the AT&T version and then lost interest. No one else has had the time or inclination to finish the (barely begun) job. Patches accepted :) Ralph Corderoy wrote: > Hi, > > >> It's a long way towards it: >> >> # AT&T. # Intel.

I have a dialplan that requires that we use * to send the long distance access code to AT&T. I have found in the list that the `w` command can be used to inject a pause, I have tried the following: exten => _91NXXXXXXXXX,1,Dial(ZAP/g1/${EXTEN}www5555555,70) There `5555555` is the ld access code. I tried various quantities of `w`s but I never got * to dial the ld access code. Allof the

Hi, I just got a T1 interface for a AT&T (became Lucent) System75 (uses same cards as Definity). I would take a crack at making a cable but can't determine the pinout for a cable and it is not apparent from the board. Asking you guys makes sense as one of you may have one of these systems. The cable has a amphenol male D50 connector on one end and probably a rj45 on the other. I also

On Mon, 1 May 2006, Jeff Cohen wrote: > Chris Lattner wrote: >> On Mon, 1 May 2006, Ralph Corderoy wrote: >>> NASM might be the nicer target since it's GNU LGPL and runs on multiple >>> OS. Its home page is broken at the moment, but the manual pages work. >>> >>> http://nasm.sourceforge.net/doc/html/nasmdoc0.html >> >> That's