similar to: [Bug 1105] New: masquerade fully broken when no prerouting chain is created

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1263 Bug ID: 1263 Summary: Device or resource busy on nat loading. Product: nftables Version: unspecified Hardware: x86_64 OS: Gentoo Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: kernel Assignee: pablo at netfilter.org

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1168 Bug ID: 1168 Summary: type nat hook output doesn't work anymore Product: nftables Version: unspecified Hardware: x86_64 OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: kernel Assignee: pablo at netfilter.org

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1155 Bug ID: 1155 Summary: arp forward filter doesn't work Product: nftables Version: unspecified Hardware: x86_64 OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: kernel Assignee: pablo at netfilter.org

hi all, as i heard, i need winbind to connect linux-clients on samba. i installed this - without pam (in the hope this would work...) but this constellation seems to be needed, as i still cannot connect, even if winbind logs my domain as accepted. Do i really have to do the pam-configuration on the samba-server-side too?? i just thought, it was enough to authentificate against smbpasswd. is

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1290 Bug ID: 1290 Summary: ptables: nftables layer breaks ipsec/policy keyword Product: nftables Version: unspecified Hardware: x86_64 OS: Debian GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: iptables over nftable

Hi, could somebody answer to my scp patch that I sent 2002-07-13? -- Miika Pekkarinen miika at ihme.org

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1117 Bug ID: 1117 Summary: Table ipv4-nat prerouting dnat doesn't accept dest IP:PORT Product: nftables Version: unspecified Hardware: x86_64 OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component: nft

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1303 Bug ID: 1303 Summary: nft improperly merges intervals Product: nftables Version: unspecified Hardware: x86_64 OS: All Status: NEW Severity: critical Priority: P5 Component: nft Assignee: pablo at netfilter.org

Hi all, I am having some strange problems with samba on one of my fileservers. I am using samba 2.2.1a compiled with qouta support and the quota patches. Kernel is 2.4.9 with quota patches. Everything seems to work fine exept some very wired things: If I try to save a document from word 2000 to a samba share the file can't be read afterwards by word. The file is on the server I can copy the

Hi Alexander, Not sure if this of any help, but we had a similar problem with runaway SMBDs and what seemed to be oplocks. We are running RH6.2 with 0.7.26 ACLs. After much messing around and hassling Jeremy, I eventually changed the kernel from 2.2.19 to 2.2.20 and recompiled everything from scratch. Since then we have not had one of these rogue processes. I think Jeremy was right when he

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1105 markus at openbsd.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Privledge Separation |Privilege Separation ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1105 Summary: Privledge Separation Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 4.2p1 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: sshd AssignedTo: bitbucket at mindrot.org ReportedBy: giffordj at linkline.com

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 ========================================================== == == Subject: Boundary failure when parsing SMB responses == can result in a buffer overrun == == CVE ID#: CVE-2008-1105 == == Versions: Samba 3.0.0 - 3.0.29 (inclusive) == == Summary: Specifically crafted SMB responses can result == in a heap overflow

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1360 Bug ID: 1360 Summary: BUG: invalid expression type concat on invalid input "iifname . oifname p . q" Product: nftables Version: unspecified Hardware: x86_64 OS: Debian GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1347 Bug ID: 1347 Summary: ebtables-nft: regression in -o option Product: nftables Version: unspecified Hardware: x86_64 OS: Debian GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: iptables over nftable Assignee:

$ grep dove /etc/passwd /etc/group /etc/passwd:_dovecot:*:214:6:Dovecot Administrator:/var/empty:/usr/bin/false /etc/passwd:_dovenull:*:227:227:Dovecot Authentication:/var/empty:/usr/bin/false /etc/group:certusers:*:29:root,_jabber,_postfix,_cyrus,_calendar,_dovecot /etc/group:_dovenull:*:227: I'm trying to build on osx so I can try to do some debugging. The INSTALL.md says to do: $ more

OSX 10.13.6 High Sierra, dovecot 2.3.2.1 dovecot starts up and runs but dies as soon as my mail client makes a request with log and config below. And advice appreciated. Thanks Mike 20180810-083730 auth: Debug: auth client connected (pid=77432) 20180810-083730 auth: Debug: client in: AUTH??? 1??? PLAIN service=imap??? secured??? session=xo1p2BRzZNd/AAAB lip=127.0.0.1??? rip=127.0.0.1???

Maybe an old problem that has resurfaced??? https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8773 Mike On 8/10/18 10:54, Aki Tuomi wrote: > I have to see if this is reproducible outside mac. > > > > --- > Aki Tuomi > Dovecot oy > > -------- Original message -------- > From: Mike Makuch <1mikemakuch at gmail.com> > Date: 10/08/2018 18:46 (GMT+02:00) > To:

I found and tried this work around on the man page: https://www.unix.com/man-page/all/5/ngroups_max/ but I still get the same "Too many extra groups" error even when I start dovecot with the above program to limit the # of groups. I suspect that dovecot is adding a number of groups when it starts up. I've hacked a work around to get it working for me on my laptop: diff --git

Hello there! I was reading this archive: http://mailman.ds9a.nl/pipermail/lartc/2002q3/004725.html It was almost two years ago when Patrick wrote a patch to switch IMQ with nat in PREROUTING chain... From www.linuximq.org I''ve downloaded newset IMQ driver for 2.4.26 and what can i see? The line that Patrick changed in that patch is still as it was in previous relases. Are there