similar to: [Bug 1009] Ability to use CIDR notation in IPV4/IPV6 named sets

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1009 Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo at netfilter.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |admin at rollinix.net --- Comment #3 from Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo at netfilter.org> --- *** Bug 994

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1009 Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo at netfilter.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #4 from Pablo Neira Ayuso

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1009 Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo at netfilter.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jason.lee.campbell at gmail.co | |m --- Comment #5 from

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1009 Vadim A. Misbakh-Soloviov (mva) <netfilter at mva.name> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |netfilter at mva.name --- Comment #1 from Vadim A. Misbakh-Soloviov (mva) <netfilter at

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1009 Tom Hughes <tom at compton.nu> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tom at compton.nu -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. -------------- next part

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3544 Bug ID: 3544 Summary: Support CIDR notation for host pattern matching Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 9.1p1 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component: Miscellaneous Assignee:

Hey guys! To make the adoption of IPv6 networks with Samba4 more smooth / robust, I think that it is vital to give to Samba4, the ability for it, to join a IPv4-Only Secondary DC, into a Dual-Stacked Primary DC. This doesn't work today. Otherwise, these days to enable IPv6 within a "Samba4 AC DC" network, it is a requirement to enable it, simultaneously, on each and every network

Author: kcpoon Repository: /hg/zfs-crypto/gate Revision: f244f36ccf8f500f22f5245345455c0fa68f4533 Log message: 6249405 CIDR support does not work for logical interface Files: update: usr/src/cmd/cmd-inet/usr.sbin/ifconfig/ifconfig.c

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1513 Damien Miller <djm at mindrot.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |2035 --- Comment #16 from Damien Miller <djm at mindrot.org> --- Retarget uncompleted bugs from 6.1 => 6.2

Dear openssh-unix-dev list, in OpenSSH 5.1 you introduced CIDR address/masklen matching for "Match address" blocks in sshd_config as well as supporting CIDR matching in ~/.ssh/authorized_keys from="..." restrictions in sshd. I wonder whether CIDR address/masklen matching will be implemented for permitopen="host:port" restrictions in sshd as well, that would be quite

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=994 Bug ID: 994 Summary: Named sets with type "ipv4_addr" do not allow adding CIDR elements Product: nftables Version: unspecified Hardware: x86_64 OS: other Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5

On Wed, 27 Aug 2008, Damien Miller wrote: > On Tue, 26 Aug 2008, Peter Stuge wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 11:22:34AM +0200, Bert Courtin wrote: > > > I wonder whether CIDR address/masklen matching will be implemented > > > for permitopen="host:port" restrictions in sshd as well, that would > > > be quite beneficially (at least for me, maybe

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1513 Damien Miller <djm at mindrot.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |2130 --- Comment #19 from Damien Miller <djm at mindrot.org> --- Retarget to openssh-6.4 -- You are

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1513 Damien Miller <djm at mindrot.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |2188 --- Comment #21 from Damien Miller <djm at mindrot.org> --- Retarget incomplete bugs / feature requests

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1513 Damien Miller <djm at mindrot.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |2226 --- Comment #23 from Damien Miller <djm at mindrot.org> --- Retarget to 6.7 release, since 6.6 was mostly

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1513 Damien Miller <djm at mindrot.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |2266 --- Comment #25 from Damien Miller <djm at mindrot.org> --- Retarget incomplete bugs to 6.8 release. --

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1513 --- Comment #27 from VP <vladimir at arobas.net> --- Ryan, have you looked at patching version 6? :) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching someone on the CC list of the bug. You are watching the assignee of the bug.

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1513 Damien Miller <djm at mindrot.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|2266 | --- Comment #28 from Damien Miller <djm at mindrot.org> --- OpenSSH 6.8 is approaching release and closed for

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1513 Damien Miller <djm at mindrot.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |2360 --- Comment #29 from Damien Miller <djm at mindrot.org> --- Retarget to 6.9 -- You are receiving this

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1513 Damien Miller <djm at mindrot.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|2360 |2403 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching someone on the CC list of the bug. You are watching