Displaying 20 results from an estimated 1000 matches similar to: "[Bug 921] New: log, ulog and nflog: command-line parameters are not supported"
2011 Sep 13
1
[Bug 748] New: Range check for ulog-cprange is wrong
http://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=748
Summary: Range check for ulog-cprange is wrong
Product: iptables
Version: unspecified
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P5
Component: iptables
AssignedTo: netfilter-buglog at lists.netfilter.org
ReportedBy:
2010 Feb 24
3
Using NFLOG in shorewall6
Dear all,
I have configured both shorewall and shorewall6 on my firewall. Shorewall is
using ULOG as logging target and since that did not seem to work I tried using
NFLOG in shorewall6. However, nothing is logged in the /var/log files.
Three questions:
- What am I doing wrong? I just use LOG=NFLOG in the params file.
- Can I use NFLOG for shorewall too?
- Do I need ulogd when setting the
2013 Nov 08
4
[Bug 871] New: Running two instances of ulog causes abort in libnfnetlink
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=871
Summary: Running two instances of ulog causes abort in
libnfnetlink
Product: ulogd
Version: SVN (please provide timestamp)
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: critical
Priority: P5
Component: ulogd
AssignedTo:
2014 Nov 07
7
[Bug 986] New: ulogd fails to build against linux headers >= 3.17.0 due to ULOG target removal
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=986
Bug ID: 986
Summary: ulogd fails to build against linux headers >= 3.17.0
due to ULOG target removal
Product: ulogd
Version: SVN (please provide timestamp)
Hardware: x86_64
OS: Gentoo
Status: NEW
Severity: major
Priority:
2014 Nov 22
0
[Bug 977] ulogd_inppkt_NFLOG.c:503 forcing unbind of existing log handler for protocol
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=977
Netbug <b1b30ee4 at opayq.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED
Resolution|INVALID |---
--- Comment #27 from Netbug <b1b30ee4 at opayq.com>
2007 Nov 20
3
Shorewall 4.1.0
I''ve opened up development of Shorewall 4.1.
While I had previously announced that Shorewall 4.1 would focus on IPv6, I
have since learned that the netfilter team are developing ''xtables'', a
unified IP0v4/IPv6 utility. It seems silly to spend the effort to add
Shorewall support for IPv6 only to then have to turn around and convert it
to use xtables. So I''ve
2011 Jun 13
2
[Bug 723] New: extensions/libxt_NFLOG.man definines invalid range for --nflog-group
http://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=723
Summary: extensions/libxt_NFLOG.man definines invalid range for -
-nflog-group
Product: iptables
Version: CVS (please indicate timestamp)
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: trivial
Priority: P5
Component: iptables
2016 Mar 31
0
[Bug 1060] New: Garbage output
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1060
Bug ID: 1060
Summary: Garbage output
Product: libnetfilter_log
Version: unspecified
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P5
Component: libnetfilter_log
Assignee: netfilter-buglog at lists.netfilter.org
2014 Nov 21
0
[Bug 977] ulogd_inppkt_NFLOG.c:503 forcing unbind of existing log handler for protocol
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=977
--- Comment #25 from Netbug <b1b30ee4 at opayq.com> ---
Oh crap maybe I did screw this up, I didn't realize I needed to change a group.
So you're saying it's showing it on 0 now and it needs to be on 1?
I remember reading this before;
Use NFLOG as your log level, and as with ULOG you can specify the
group NFLOG(1,0,1). NFLOG
2014 Nov 21
0
[Bug 977] ulogd_inppkt_NFLOG.c:503 forcing unbind of existing log handler for protocol
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=977
Eric Leblond <eric at regit.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |INVALID
--- Comment #26 from Eric Leblond <eric at
2004 Jul 23
4
shorewall 2.0.3a, (ULOG) doesn''t log anything
Dear all:
Im using shorewall 2.0.3a (debian) w/ ULOG. shorewall starts ok, and the
firewall is running, but nothing is printed on the logs.
I try, for example, to do a connection to a port that is opened on the
server but closed by the FW and I get a connection refused. If I stop
the firewall, this port is accesible from the outside.
I think I''ve followed all the steps on
2009 Aug 25
1
[PATCH] A default log level of ULOG is ignored by the shorewall-perl compiler (but not by shorewall-shell)
Hello,
I tried Shorewall for the first time today. I am currently using an up-to-date
installation of Debian Sid, which has shorewall 4.2.10, shorewall-shell 4.2.10
and shorewall-perl 4.2.10.1.
I noticed that even though I had the following /etc/shorewall/policy file,
iptables would still show LOG rules at the end of the INPUT and OUTPUT chains
instead of ULOG rules. (Other logging related rules
2018 Mar 01
0
[Bug 1232] New: Ulogd2 Failed Startup on VPS
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1232
Bug ID: 1232
Summary: Ulogd2 Failed Startup on VPS
Product: ulogd
Version: SVN (please provide timestamp)
Hardware: x86_64
OS: Debian GNU/Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: major
Priority: P5
Component: ulogd
Assignee:
2002 Mar 17
2
ulog support in shorewall?
Hi,
I''ve just recently switched off my (lame) hardware firewall onto an
old box running linux 2.4.18, iptables 1.2.6 and shorewall 1.2.9. I''m
kinda new to linux firewalling myself but so far Shorewall has taken
much work from me.
While reading myself into iptables I saw that just recently something
called ULOG (userspace logging) has been implemented in newer kernels
and
2002 Jan 31
0
[ANNOUNCE] problems with recent ULOG patch and old ulogd
--/aVve/J9H4Wl5yVO
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi Everybody!
I had to change the ulog.patch in recent patch-o-matic to use a different
netlink family (it's now 5 instead of 4).
This means, you will have to recompile your ulogd or any other application
in order to make it work.
That's also why I have
2011 May 19
1
[Bug 652] pcap plugin problem
http://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=652
Mariusz Kielpinski <kielpi at poczta.onet.pl> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |kielpi at poczta.onet.pl
Status|ASSIGNED |NEW
--- Comment #3 from
2005 Jan 07
5
ULOG weirdness with 2.0.10
I''m noticing some weirdness in my ulog files with version 2.0.10. Here
is a portion of the log:
Jan 7 11:01:37 rancor Shorewall:loc2fw:AllowWOL: IN=eth1 OUT=
MAC=ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:00:0a:95:b2:11:4c:08:00 SRC=192.168.0.100
DST=192.168.0.255 LEN=97 TOS=00 PREC=0x00 TTL=64 ID=44155 CE PROTO=UDP
SPT=631 DPT=631 LEN=77
Jan 7 11:01:39 rancor Shorewall:loc2fw:AllowWOL: IN=eth1 OUT=
2004 Aug 08
1
using ULOG
hi,
if i would like to use ulog (in order to split netfilter messages from
other kernel messages), than i have to set all loglevel to ULOG? and
then is there any way to define diferent loglevel for eg. maclist?
thanks in advance.
yours.
ps. it''s a bit confusing that all loglevel parameter name is LOG_LEVEL
except BLACKLIST_LOGLEVEL:-(
--
Levente
2012 May 26
0
[ANNOUNCE] iptables 1.4.14 release
Hi!
The Netfilter project proudly presents:
iptables 1.4.14
This release several bugfixes and support for the new cttimeout
infrastructure. This allows you to attach specific timeout policies to
flow via iptables CT target.
The following example shows the usage of this new infrastructure in a
couple of steps:
1) Create a timeout policy with name `custom-tcp-policy1':
nfct
2002 Dec 13
0
ULOG Support now in CVS
Anywhere that a syslog level can appear, you can now specify ULOG (must be
upper case) and logging will occur to the ulog target. You can download
ulogd from http://www.gnumonks.org/projects/ulogd.
Only the ''firewall'' file is required. None of the comments in the other
config files are updated yet but I''m working on it.
-Tom
--
Tom Eastep \ Shorewall - iptables