similar to: Problem boot PXE UEFI on HP ML350 Gen9

On Thu, Mar 5, 2015 at 2:03 PM, Jorge Cisneros via Syslinux <syslinux at zytor.com> wrote: > Hi All, > > My PXE configurations works fine for a bios PXE (the server in legacy > mode) but hangs in an EUFI mode. Look like it can transfer the bootx64.efi > but not the next one ldlinux.e64 > > > Any ideas? My latest personally-published binaries.

> Hi All, > > My PXE configurations works fine for a bios PXE (the server in legacy > mode) but hangs in an EUFI mode. Look like it can transfer the bootx64.efi > but not the next one ldlinux.e64 > > > Any ideas? > > Thanks > Latest updates (including firmware) for the HP ML350 Gen9 were released on 2014DEC19 (v1.21); I would suggest double-checking

Hi list! I tried to install Xen 4 in a HP Proliant ML350 G4p, but it seems not compatible, is there another way to run Xen 4 in this server ? I couldn''t find any information on Hp''s site neither Intel''s site ... Thanks ! -- @ntonio _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com

We bought a Compaq ML350 G5. When trying to install Centos, I got the message: No disk installed. and centos suggest me a list of drivers, but none of them seems to work. Has anybody tried this? Any help would be appreciated. carlos -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Hi, I have been trying to install CentOS 5.1, 5.2,and 5.3 and the HP server but to no success. It starts loading well the on trying to load the cciss driver, the machine hangs there and refuses to move on. Any help will help quite alot. Thanks

Hello, we have a problem with pxelinux and a specific hardware. In short: PXE starts, get and start the pxelinux.0 but can't get the configuration file. This problem belongs only to one new client. Other clients work in this environment with out any problem. The client is a HP xw4300 with the networkcard: ------------ vendor = "Broadcom Corporation" name = "NetXtreme BCM5752

Hi, I am trying to setup my own PXE boot server. I tried several PXE bootable Linux-Distributions. For example if I use the ubuntu netboot image from [1] it works quit well but there are a few other images they do not work in my case e.g.: RIPLinuX [2]. A friend tested this image on his PXE boot server with success. I also checked the download with md5sum. In my case I can see the boot menu [3].

I'm trying to network boot a thin client using pxelinux. I had this working about a year ago but have since reinstalled my OS (went from RH9 to FC2). I'm using atftpd. The thin client gets the dhcp address fine and requests pxelinux.0. Eventually, it just times out. Here's the relevant info from /var/log/messages: Oct 7 23:14:36 home atftpd[4717]: Advanced Trivial FTP server started

On 2014/3/10 ?? 05:48, Gene Cumm wrote: > 1) My assumption would be that the VMware virtualized AMD 79C970A > (PCNet32 driver; vlance virtualDev) lacks proper EFI64 support. > > 2) I have 0 speed issues using your VMX. If you only have two real > cores for this 2vCPU VM, you're choking it as the host needs time to > run. If you choke it, you mess with timers. If you mess

On 21.09.2015 12:06, Gene Cumm wrote: > On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 2:38 AM, Mathias Radtke <m.radtke at uib.de> wrote: >> >> On 18.09.2015 16:35, Gene Cumm wrote: >>> 1) This is actually a critical cusp size. Watch what tftpd you use or >>> you'll never get it all. The tftpd needs to support rollover. >>> Consider HTTP as it should be more capable

On Sat, Mar 8, 2014 at 2:05 AM, Steven Shiau <steven at nchc.org.tw> wrote: > Hi Gene, > Thanks. As you mentioned, atftpd has better logging, and my files are > smaller than 92 MB, so I switched to atftpd for testing. Now I could > find that somehow after bootx64.efi is downloaded by client, the next > ldlinux.e64 has never been fetched by client: > ====================

On 2014?03?08? 05:56, Gene Cumm wrote: > In /etc/vmware/vmnet8/dhcpd/dhcpd.conf I added the following: > > host 7x { > hardware ethernet 00:0C:29:38:6B:6E; > filename "e6/bootx64.efi"; > next-server 172.21.1.1; > # option vendor-encapsulated-options >

On Fri, Feb 6, 2015 at 4:57 AM, Holger Baust via Syslinux <syslinux at zytor.com> wrote: > Am 06.02.2015 um 07:44 schrieb Geert Stappers via Syslinux: >> On Fri, Feb 06, 2015 at 12:08:58AM +0100, Holger Baust via Syslinux wrote: >>> Hello... >> Welcome the Syslinux project! >> >> >>> Am 05.02.15 um 23:33 schrieb Geert Stappers via Syslinux:

On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 9:40 AM, Holger Baust via Syslinux <syslinux at zytor.com> wrote: > Am 07.02.2015 um 19:50 schrieb Geert Stappers via Syslinux: >> On Sat, Feb 07, 2015 at 01:06:06PM -0500, Gene Cumm wrote: >>> On Fri, Feb 6, 2015 at 4:57 AM, Holger Baust wrote: >>>> Am 06.02.2015 um 07:44 schrieb Geert Stappers: >>>>>>> On Thu, Feb

On Fri, Feb 06, 2015 at 12:08:58AM +0100, Holger Baust via Syslinux wrote: > Hello... Welcome the Syslinux project! > Am 05.02.15 um 23:33 schrieb Geert Stappers via Syslinux: > > On Thu, Feb 05, 2015 at 07:02:07PM +0100, Holger Baust wrote: <snip/> > >> > >> NBP file downloaded successfully. > >> Getting chached packet > >> My IP is

Hello, we have the following problem: - a new Dell Optiplex 740 boots pxelinux.0 - loads the kernel - start to load the miniroot.gz and crashs after loading about 1/5 of the miniroot The tftpd messages are: Feb 21 14:48:32 srv006 atftpd[26225]: Advanced Trivial FTP server started (0.7) Feb 21 14:48:32 srv006 atftpd[26225]: Serving /linux/pxelinux.0 to 10.10.100.113:2070 Feb 21 14:48:32 srv006

Apologies to the OP and all, I got my wires crossed and replied in the wrong thread. On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 5:40 PM, Lane < software.research.development at gmail.com> wrote: > I didn't understand that either, why DHCP was not captured. The DHCP > server and the TFTP server are both on the master node. But I do have > another capture file that collects everything and shows

Hi, I've been struggling with this problem for the last couple of hours and am nowhere near solving the problem. I am trying to run a tftp server in a chroot jail. Now perhaps I am being paranoid, but I would like to have it launched from within its own jail even if it supposedly does a chroot itself and runs with a parameterizable user. I downloaded the atftp-server package and tried

On 2014?03?08? 20:57, Gene Cumm wrote: > Please try 6.03-pre6. I see a regression on 6.03-pre7 with EFI64 netboot > >> > Another thing you I'd like to mentioned is, after bootx64.efi was >> > downloaded, the next download for ldlinux.e64 was about 15 secs later. >> > Is that normal? > When it's successful for me, it takes 0.2s from the beginning of >

Am 07.02.2015 um 19:50 schrieb Geert Stappers via Syslinux: > On Sat, Feb 07, 2015 at 01:06:06PM -0500, Gene Cumm wrote: >> On Fri, Feb 6, 2015 at 4:57 AM, Holger Baust wrote: >>> Am 06.02.2015 um 07:44 schrieb Geert Stappers: >>>>>> On Thu, Feb 05, 2015 at 07:02:07PM +0100, Holger Baust wrote: >>>>>>> My IP is 0.0.0.0