Displaying 20 results from an estimated 10000 matches similar to: "DMARC test (request)"
2015 Jan 23
1
DMARC test (request)
On Sun, Jan 18, 2015 at 11:11 AM, Patrick Masotta <masottaus at yahoo.com> wrote:
>> As per
>> prior discussions, the "From:" field should remain
>> with the
>> original sender. One (important)
>> reason is that frequent participants
>> in the
>> Syslinux Mailing List tend to use the "From:"
>> field, for
>> instance
2008 Mar 28
2
Comparing proportions between groups
Hello there,
I have two groups (men and women) and I know per group how many of them
smoke or don't smoke (women 40 of 200; men 100 of 300). I would like to know
how I can compare in R if men and women differ significantly in their
smoking. However, because there are more men in the sample than women I
cannot just compare the number of smokers and non-smokers in both groups,
right?! (I would
2008 Mar 10
3
A stats question -- about survival analysis and censoring
Dear UseRs,
Suppose I have data regarding smoking habits of a prospective cohort and wish
to determine the risk ratio of colorectal cancer in the smokers compared to
the non-smokers. What do I do at the end of the study with people who die
of heart disease? Can I just censor them exactly the same as people who become
uncontactable or who die in a plane crash? If not, why not?
I'm thinking
2010 Jul 27
2
Samba LDAP ignores group information
Hi.
Excuse my English.
I've installed Samba+OpenLDAP as a PDC.
Everything works fine but Samba ignores completely group information.
Linux is ok.
Any clue? I'm going crazy here!
Here's the sittuation:
user: fish1
home dir: /home/reaml/swim/fish1
primary group: swimmers
other groups: smokers
Directory of smoker's group: /home/realm/smokers
Here's an 'ls -l' on
2018 Nov 30
0
DMARC policies
On 11/29/2018 11:13 PM, Aki Tuomi wrote:
> Hi!
>
> It seems we accidentically had a high amount of subscribers temporarily
> disabled due to DMARC on some sender's host. We have now taken actions
> to prevent this in the future and all temporarily disabled members have
> been restored.
>
> Aki
>
>
I've seen that happen on several lists.
I disabled DMARC
2019 Feb 09
0
offtopic: rant about thoughtless enabling DMARC checks [was: Re: Bounces?]
On 2/9/19 10:48 AM, Juri Haberland via dovecot wrote:
> On 09/02/2019 10:44, Aki Tuomi via dovecot wrote:
>> For some reason mailman failed to "munge from" for senders with dmarc policy ;(
>>
>> It's now configured to always munge to avoid this again.
>
> I'd say, let Mailman throw all people off the list that have enabled DMARC
> checking without
2017 Aug 24
3
dmarc report faild ?
In the same vein,
I am receiving forensic DMARC reports from mx01.nausch.org.
Whenever I send a message to the mailing list or when my server sends a
DMARC report, I'm getting a DMARC Forensic report.
It's odd, because the actual report tells me both DKIM and SPF (in the
the of a DMARC report) pass...
Here is what I am getting :
This is an authentication failure report for an email
2015 Jan 04
0
DMARC test
On Sun, Jan 4, 2015 at 9:27 AM, gene.cumm at yahoo.com <gene.cumm at yahoo.com> wrote:
> Test from Yahoo via Android
>
> --Gene
> _______________________________________________
> Syslinux mailing list
> Submissions to Syslinux at zytor.com
> Unsubscribe or set options at:
> http://www.zytor.com/mailman/listinfo/syslinux
As some users may already be aware, my test
2011 Mar 08
1
Sorting
I apologize in advance if this is posted all ready I have not been able to
find any information about it. I have this data frame and I want to sort
smoking by retlevel.
Age Gender BMI Calories Fat Fiber Alc retlevel
Smoking
1 64 Female 18.87834 1828.0 63.4 14.7 0.0 Normal Non-Smoker
2 25 Female 20.64102 1517.4 59.1 5.9 0.0 Normal Smoker
3
2018 Nov 30
5
DMARC policies
Hi!
It seems we accidentically had a high amount of subscribers temporarily
disabled due to DMARC on some sender's host. We have now taken actions
to prevent this in the future and all temporarily disabled members have
been restored.
Aki
2015 Jan 04
4
DMARC test
On Sun, Jan 04, 2015 at 12:14:51PM -0500, Gene Cumm wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 4, 2015 at 9:27 AM, gene.cumm at yahoo.com <gene.cumm at yahoo.com> wrote:
> > Test from Yahoo via Android
> >
> > --Gene
> > _______________________________________________
> > Syslinux mailing list
> > Submissions to Syslinux at zytor.com
> > Unsubscribe or set options at:
2019 Feb 09
0
offtopic: rant about thoughtless enabling DMARC checks [was: Re: Bounces?]
<!doctype html>
<html>
<head>
<meta charset="UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<div>
<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite">
<div>
On 09 February 2019 at 20:48 Juri Haberland via dovecot <
<a href="mailto:dovecot@dovecot.org">dovecot@dovecot.org</a>> wrote:
</div>
2019 Sep 17
0
OT: DMARC / DKIM Failure Reports
On 2019-09-17 09:06, Miroslav Geisselreiter wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> when I send e-mails to CentOS mailing list <centos at centos.org>, I
> received DMARC / DKIM failure reports. Is it possible to solve this
> problem and if so how?
>
That is why DMARC took 10 years of heated discussions, before it was
actually implemented - in first place by big boys who will never
2015 Aug 22
0
[meta] Yahoo, Gmail and DMARC
All,
Within the last year, Yahoo has published some strict DMARC filtering policies, and Gmail is dutifully rejecting emails that fail the DMARC policies. Unfortunately, this has some negative consequences for other list members, even those without a Yahoo address (in particular, Gmail bounces messages that fail the DMARC checks, and after a certain number of bounces, Mailman unsubscribes the
2015 Aug 22
0
[meta] Yahoo, Gmail and DMARC
All,
Within the last year, Yahoo has published some strict DMARC filtering policies, and Gmail is dutifully rejecting emails that fail the DMARC policies. Unfortunately, this has some negative consequences for other list members, even those without a Yahoo address (in particular, Gmail bounces messages that fail the DMARC checks, and after a certain number of bounces, Mailman unsubscribes the
2017 Aug 24
0
dmarc report faild ?
Maurizio Caloro:
> Please i have new following Error, from DMARC Report, if i check my domain
> on example mxtoolbox i dont see any problems.
>
> Any from you know this Eror report, what i need to do to fix this issue?
I guess, the reports are about messages you sent to the list:
https://dovecot.org/pipermail/dovecot/2017-August/109097.html
are you *really* sure you signed the
2013 Sep 05
2
Vacation message and DMARC validation
Greetings,
I have found an issue in the interaction between sieve vacation messages
and the SPF, DKIM and DMARC email validation systems.
For example, let's say we have a message coming from a at a.com to b at b.com
at a server imap.mydomain.com. The account b at b.com has a vacation rule
in sieve, and that generates an autoresponse to a at a.com. Our problem
begins with the definition
2015 Jan 17
0
DMARC test (request)
On Sun, Jan 04, 2015 at 07:37:44PM +0100, Geert Stappers wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 04, 2015 at 12:14:51PM -0500, Gene Cumm wrote:
<snip/>
> > As far as I can tell, GMail does process the SPF/DKIM/DMARC properties
> > but ignores Yahoo!'s DMARC policy to reject on failure.
>
> The Syslinux ML should now be ready for DMARC p=reject
>
> We shall see how
2015 Jan 22
0
DMARC test (request)
> On Saturday, January 17, 2015 9:34 AM, Gene Cumm <gene.cumm at yahoo.com> wrote:
> > On Saturday, January 17, 2015 1:48 AM, Geert Stappers <stappers at stappers.nl> wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Sun, Jan 04, 2015 at 07:37:44PM +0100, Geert Stappers wrote:
> > > On Sun, Jan 04, 2015 at 12:14:51PM -0500, Gene Cumm wrote:
> > <snip/>
2019 Feb 10
1
offtopic: rant about thoughtless enabling DMARC checks
On 2/10/19 3:46 PM, Michael A. Peters via dovecot wrote:
> On 2/10/19 3:42 PM, Noel Butler via dovecot wrote:
>> On 10/02/2019 12:49, Benny Pedersen via dovecot wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> fixing mailman will be the fail, solve it by letting opendkim and
>>> opendmarc not reject detected maillist will be solution,
>>
>>
>> A general broad mailing