similar to: dmarc_moderaction_action

On Sun, Jan 04, 2015 at 03:14:51PM +0100, Geert Stappers wrote: > > dmarc_moderation_action (privacy): Action to take when anyone posts > > to the list from a domain with a DMARC Reject/Quarantine Policy. > > > > Wrap Message -- applies the "from_is_list Wrap Message" transformation > > to these messages. > > > > from_is_list

On Sunday, January 4, 2015 12:53 PM, Geert Stappers <stappers at stappers.nl> wrote: > On Sun, Jan 04, 2015 at 03:14:51PM +0100, Geert Stappers wrote: > > > dmarc_moderation_action (privacy): Action to take when anyone posts > > > to the list from a domain with a DMARC Reject/Quarantine Policy. > > > > > > Wrap Message -- applies the

On Sat, Jan 3, 2015 at 12:53 PM, John 'Warthog9' Hawley <warthog19 at eaglescrag.net> wrote: > On 01/03/2015 08:56 AM, Gene Cumm wrote: >> On Fri, Jan 2, 2015 at 3:43 PM, Geert Stappers <stappers at stappers.nl> wrote: >>> On Sat, Dec 27, 2014 at 05:07:04PM +0100, Geert Stappers wrote: >>>> On Mon, Dec 22, 2014 at 11:06:58AM +0200, Ady wrote:

On 01/03/2015 08:56 AM, Gene Cumm wrote: > On Fri, Jan 2, 2015 at 3:43 PM, Geert Stappers <stappers at stappers.nl> wrote: >> On Sat, Dec 27, 2014 at 05:07:04PM +0100, Geert Stappers wrote: >>> On Mon, Dec 22, 2014 at 11:06:58AM +0200, Ady wrote: >>>>> On Sun, Dec 21, 2014 at 12:21:32PM -0800, Patrick Masotta wrote: >>>>>> [ ... Failed to

On Sunday, January 4, 2015 12:53 PM, Geert Stappers <stappers at stappers.nl> wrote: > On Sun, Jan 04, 2015 at 03:14:51PM +0100, Geert Stappers wrote: > > A first message came through, > > A first message from yahoo.com ( http://www.syslinux.org/archives/2015-January/023060.html ) > did arive at my e-mail server, _without_ modified 'From:', _without_

Am 16.06.2018 um 12:25 schrieb Johnny Hughes via CentOS <centos at centos.org>: > We have now set the mailing list to rewrite headers. That also has set > the From: of the email to the Mailing list and not the Original Author. > The author is moved to the CC: block and you can still easily see who > sent it and my email client (thunderbird) still does things the same way >

On Thu, Jul 18, 2024 at 5:14?AM Stuart Henderson <stu at spacehopper.org> wrote: > The mail admins can choose what is covered by the DKIM signature. > In the case of barclays.com there are various headers (which I think > make it through the mailing list untouched) but also the body, which > does not; a footer with the list URL is added. The real issue here is that the Mailman

Hi all, There's a good chance that the people who most need to see this won't see it, but here goes anyway. Google is currently dropping a _lot_ of the mail we attempt to deliver to lists.fd.o subscribers. The immediate cause is sending on mail from domains with SPF/DKIM/DMARC policies which explicitly specify that lists.fd.o cannot relay mail on their behalf. Every time we do that, not

On 2024-07-20 at 16:30 -0400, James Ralston wrote: > The real issue here is that the Mailman configuration for the > openssh-unix-dev list does not appear to set > `dmarc_moderation_action` > (in `Privacy options` - `Sender filters`) to either `Munge From` or > `Wrap Message`, which is necessary for lists where ... "Necessary" if the client machines re going to penalize

> > > > > > Let's see what happens. > > > > > > > Perhaps this time? > > I did miss the reason why a new test would be usefull. > Perhaps are people behind the curtains too shy :-) > > The test did NOT show any improvement. > > > In the webinterface of mailman, that is where I access privileges, > is now

Before I go through the hassle of building it myself I want to know if someone else has built RPMS for Mailman 2.1.16. I *need* to update the version of Mailman on my CentOS 5 server to Mailman 2.1.16 in order to be able to use the from_is_list option to deal with DMARC issues with Yahoo, Aol, and Hotmail. -- Robert Heller -- 978-544-6933 / heller at deepsoft.com Deepwoods

On Sat, Jan 17, 2015 at 12:56 PM, Patrick Masotta <masottaus at yahoo.com> wrote: > >If 1 person with a yahoo.com e-mail adres does reply on this >> message, >> then we have test result for the setting that was changed >> wednesday. > > test Patrick, Due to Yahoo!'s DMARC, you probably didn't see the other two tests I already sent as I didn't see

> Date: Saturday, June 16, 2018 05:25:05 -0500 > From: Johnny Hughes via CentOS <centos at centos.org> > > On 06/15/2018 05:18 PM, Richard wrote: >> >> >> I believe this is a DMARC issue. Yahoo, among other places, has set >> their dmarc records to p=reject: >> >> dig +short txt _dmarc.yahoo.com >> "v=DMARC1; p=reject;

>If 1 person with a yahoo.com e-mail adres does reply on this > message, > then we have test result for the setting that was changed > wednesday. test

> Date: Friday, June 15, 2018 14:55:21 -0700 > From: Akemi Yagi <amyagi at gmail.com> > > On Fri, Jun 15, 2018 at 9:57 AM, Gianluca Cecchi > <gianluca.cecchi at gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Il Ven 15 Giu 2018, 18:45 Larry Martell <larry.martell at gmail.com> >> ha scritto: >> >>> On Fri, Jun 15, 2018 at 12:41 PM rj coleman >>>

[sorry off-topic, ignore if uninterested in dmarc/dkim/mail filters] On 2024/07/17 22:14, mark.yagnatinsky at barclays.com wrote: > I don't know enough about DMARC to make any sense of what you just said... actually wait, maybe I get it. > You're saying that email sent that I send to the list will land in your inbox with my address in the From header. > But the recipient mail

On Sat, Dec 27, 2014 at 05:07:04PM +0100, Geert Stappers wrote: > On Mon, Dec 22, 2014 at 11:06:58AM +0200, Ady wrote: > > > On Sun, Dec 21, 2014 at 12:21:32PM -0800, Patrick Masotta wrote: > > > > [ ... Failed to build gnu-efi. ... ] > > > > For some reason I have not received the original email from Patrick > > Masotta in my inbox, so I am using the

On Fri, Jan 2, 2015 at 3:43 PM, Geert Stappers <stappers at stappers.nl> wrote: > On Sat, Dec 27, 2014 at 05:07:04PM +0100, Geert Stappers wrote: >> On Mon, Dec 22, 2014 at 11:06:58AM +0200, Ady wrote: >> > > On Sun, Dec 21, 2014 at 12:21:32PM -0800, Patrick Masotta wrote: >> > > > [ ... Failed to build gnu-efi. ... ] >> > >> > For some

On Mon, Dec 22, 2014 at 11:06:58AM +0200, Ady wrote: > > On Sun, Dec 21, 2014 at 12:21:32PM -0800, Patrick Masotta wrote: > > > [ ... Failed to build gnu-efi. ... ] > > For some reason I have not received the original email from Patrick > Masotta in my inbox, so I am using the first reply sent by Geert in > order to actually reply to the OP... What is visible in the

> On Sun, Dec 21, 2014 at 12:21:32PM -0800, Patrick Masotta wrote: > > sudo apt-get install build-essential > > sudo apt-get build-dep gcc-multilib > > sudo apt-get install gcc-multilib > > > > sudo apt-get install nasm > > sudo apt-get install uuid-dev > > > > I run > > #make spotless > > #make > > > > but it