similar to: boot from local drive does't work

I have tried "LOCALBOOT -1" , it still didn't work. ? 2014?02?25? 12:44, Gene Cumm ??: > On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 10:27 PM, ?? <lei.xia at cs2c.com.cn> wrote: >> Hi, all >> >> I can't boot from local drive on some machines(thinkpad x200 and >> thinkpad x1 carbon) using >> syslinux 3.05 or syslinux 4.05. >> >> And i change

On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 10:27 PM, ?? <lei.xia at cs2c.com.cn> wrote: > Hi, all > > I can't boot from local drive on some machines(thinkpad x200 and > thinkpad x1 carbon) using > syslinux 3.05 or syslinux 4.05. > > And i change localboot 0xffff to localboot 0x80, boot from local drive > is available. > > I find "0x80 is the primary hard drive. The

Hi, all I am confused, I run the ?make? command in the directory which is the sources of syslinux, and storage the output to a file, but i cannot find to how do the isolinux.bin to be produced. Also, I find that the isolinux.bin file is in the sources of syslinux(bios/core). So, I am curious how do the isolinux.bin to be produced, and where can I get the sources of isolinux.bin? Could

Help everyone... I need to track the spread of a BIOS bug. One symptom of this particular BIOS bug is that with pxelinux.0 from Syslinux 3.83-pre9, "localboot 0" works, but *if pxelinux.0 chainloads itself first*, then "localboot 0" *does not work*. I have reasons to believe this is a fairly widespread bug among newer hardware (made in the last two years or so), and it is

I like how some cds, such as the windows installer discs will skip booting from the disc if you accidentally left the drive because they require you to hit a key to make them actually boot from the disc. I've kind of tried to emulate this behavior using chain.c32, but, it requires me to specify which harddrive, and I'd rather see an independant setup. I've tried localboot -1, but, it

Hi, I have boon Googling quite a bit on this, but is it possible: I want to build an ISOLINUX boot CD, but want one of the option to be "Continue booting from hard drive" and thus disregard booting from the kernel on the CD. Is it possible? Or what can I do to force a HD boot from ISOLINUX.CFG? Thanks Herman Starship Systems

<Docs> LOCALBOOT type [ISOLINUX, PXELINUX] On PXELINUX, specifying "LOCALBOOT 0" instead of a "KERNEL" option means invoking this particular label will cause a local disk boot instead of booting a kernel. The argument 0 means perform a normal boot. The argument 4 will perform a local boot with the Universal Network Driver Interface (UNDI) driver still

git://git.zytor.com/users/genec/syslinux.git Branch doc-syslinux-for-hpa Expand upon the explanation of the usage of CONFIG (including a new directory). Edit LOCALBOOT to include the fact that all variants understand LOCALBOOT type -1. Compact the PXELINUX section to one paragraph. -- -Gene

Hello * this morning I tried to upgrade from pxelinux 3.11 to 3.84 and discovered that the localboot stuff does not work on HP DL360 G3 and G5. The latest syslinux Version I found with a working localboot is 3.36. pxelinux.cfg/default: default harddisk prompt 1 label harddisk localboot 0 implicit 0 timeout 250 This so simple, it should just work, shouldn't it? The

Hi All, I'm trying to setup gpxelinux instead of pxelinux, my goal is to fetch the configuration files and images via http. additionally, I want to setup all servers to boot by default from PXE - the idea is that I can control whats booted in another place, and I don't need to physically (or virtually) go through menus or do stuff on the machine. my basic proof of concept is: isc dhcp

Hello, A couple of months back there was this message on the list. http://syslinux.zytor.com/archives/2010-October/015459.html I have exactly the same result on just a few types of machines. Acer Tavelmate 8372 and 5742 InsydeH2O Bios v1.05 Broadcom UNDI PXE 2.1 V 14.0.8 It started after I upgrades pxelinux.0 to version 3.86 Versions tested and got the recursing: 3.86, 3.85, 3.84 and 3.83 On

Hi, When we meet UEFI or EFI firmware, lots of linux os release use GRUB bootloader. But I wanna use isolinux to boot the installation environment and also the linux os installed. Some question puzzled me. Now, I look for your help: 1. I didn't found information about how to use syslinux(isolinux,etc.) in uefi. I wanna know that are there some differences of the isolinux configuration

I?ve been trying to get the dd of an iso to a usb flash drive to work for CentOS 6.7. It is working with the CentOS 7 DVD1 iso (x64), but if I use the same process with 6.7 bin dvd1 iso or the 6.7 live dvd, the flash drive will not boot. I thought 6.x and forward could be done like this. -wes

Ive got a soekris 4801 on which Ive used pxelinux... its bios is set to go to pxeboot 1st, then localboot. Ive got: label bootlocal MENU label ^9 Boot Local localboot 0 # timeout 80 # TOTALTIMEOUT 9000 but using hangs: Booting from local disk... PXE-M0F: Exiting MacPhyter PXE ROM. then nothing. the same compact flash image works fine when boot order is 80 1st, or

I have a defective HP-Compaq nx9420 and so I am looking to replace it. I have pretty much decided to buy no further MicroSoft based products and would very much like to hear recommendations for a suitable notebook host to provide me with Linux based alternative. Given that all the basic functionality required is provided, the main thing that I am looking for is reliability of the host itself. I

High all, In WinXP, I have created file "image.iso" using mkisofs, but unable to postprocess with the "isohybrid". I worked as follows: cd F:\syslinux-4.05\utils F:\syslinux-4.05\utils> isohybrid F:\image.iso and received >'isohybrid' is not recognized as an internal or external command, operable program or batch file. What next? Thanks in advance.

What is the difference between PXELINUX and bpbatch ? AFAICT, bpbatch doe not require a TFTP server which supports the 'tsize' option. So in the absence of such a server, I may need to explore bpbatch... It seems that bpbatch can be used to remotely boot DOS. Can PXELINUX also do this? -- John

Hi everyone, I have released Syslinux 6.03. It is by and large identical to 6.03-pre20. I would like to do a short cycle for 6.04, because 64-bit support for ext4 has come up as a very high priority. Therefore I do not want to stuff too many things into the 6.04 release but hold them for 6.05. Thanks to Ady for most of the changelog. Changes in 6.03: * chain: Fix chainloading on 6.02

Hi. There are Samba 3.0.20b and 'local master = yes'. If I use WInXP or Win98, I can browse network. All is Ok. But I am getting an error "The server is not configured for transactions" when I try to browse network with Windows NT 4.0. I can connect to some PC on network by `\\PCNAME' command. But can't browse network! Could somebody help me? Thank you. samba's PC

I have [global section] [global] printing = cups cups server = desktop printcap name = /etc/printcap load printers = yes [HP DeskJet 5700] comment = HP Deskjet 5700 map to guest = Bad User browseable = Yes guest only = Yes path = /var/spool/samba guest ok =Yes public = Yes printable = Yes printer name = deskjet-5700-1 use client driver = Yes yet when I try to add this printer,