similar to: [PATCH] Add some man pages.

Could someone help me get the syntax for `genisoimage' and/or `xorriso' correct? Apparently it is not in many linux distros so below my little HOWTO shows how to compile it. ( which adds tons of crap that can go wrong) mkdir -p ISO_root/isolinux cp /usr/lib/syslinux/[i,m,v]* ISO_root/isolinux cat > ISO_root/isolinux/isolinux.cfg << EOF UI menu.c32 label isolinuxtests EOF # Most

Hi, > # Most linux distros dont have `mkisofs' Or they have genisoimage under the name "mkisofs". (e.g. Debian, Archlinux) > mkisofs \ > -o output.iso \ > -no-emul-boot \ > -boot-info-table \ > -boot-load-size 4 \ > -c isolinux/boot.cat \ > -b isolinux/isolinux.bin \ > ISO_root I would add option -R or -r for Rock Ridge names and file

On Sun, Feb 2, 2014 at 6:27 AM, Mattias Schlenker <ms at mattiasschlenker.de>wrote: [...] > Build a recent xorriso - this can be run from the build directory without > installing (thanks, Thomas!): > > ./configure --enable-static > > Thank you for pointing this out, I tried desperately to statically compile `mkisofs' yesterday, to no avail. To hear that xorriso is

Hi, On 23/06/2014 12:07, Thomas Schmitt wrote:> Hi, > > i have written an introduction to isohybrid and put it on > the discussion page of the ISOLINUX wiki. > > http://www.syslinux.org/wiki/index.php/Talk:ISOLINUX#Proposal_for_description_of_isohybrid > > Review and proposals are appreciated. Caveat emptor: this is a review by an end user (not a developer), who

> Hi, > > > All the "isohybrid.exe" I know of are based on the Perl variant. > > I just got one from > http://www.filewatcher.com/m/isohybrid.exe.39568-0.html > > Its strings seem not to stem from isohybrid.pl. > > Digging in slitaz source brought a shell script (that would be > variant #5 then): >

Hello everyone, I am maintaining a distribution loosely based on LFS and am now trying to add UEFI support. Integrating a FAT formatted partition image containing, preloader, gummiboot, kernel and initramfs correctly results in a ISO image that is bootable on BIOS and UEFI systems if booted from the optical drive. However, when I run isohybrid --uefi name-of.iso the resulting GPT entry for

Hello Thomas, Thomas Schmitt via Syslinux said on Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 04:35:57PM +0100: >I assume you can boot Fedora Live CD on the same (virtual) hardware. Not sure for Fedora, but the system is installed with either RHEL6, RHEL7 or Ubuntu 14.04 depending on the Lab I'm making on it without issue. >Just to make sure that the firmware works so far. Globally they do ;-) >

> Hi, > > i have written an introduction to isohybrid and put it on > the discussion page of the ISOLINUX wiki. > > http://www.syslinux.org/wiki/index.php/Talk:ISOLINUX#Proposal_for_description_of_isohybrid > > Review and proposals are appreciated. > > The reference to "above mkisofs command" anticipates the final > position of this text at the end

> Hello, > > Gene Cumm said on Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 06:39:44PM -0400: > >On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 1:56 PM, Bruno Cornec via Syslinux > ><syslinux at zytor.com> wrote: > > > >> 3/ Using syslinux.efi in a FAT32 image (similar to the previous 2 > >> confs) stored on a iso9660 media by genisoimage and its > >> -eltorito-alt-boot -efi-boot

Thomas Schmitt via Syslinux said on Sat, Oct 24, 2015 at 12:56:49AM +0200: >Needed is a EFI FAT image > 32 MiB and a new xorriso (available >on demand). My test script on RHEL 7.1 creates that even if I could make it smaller as the kernel + initrd fits in less than 32 MB. So let me make that try first ! o I changed myline in the script to dd a 30 MB image file, burt the ISO with it, and

> Hello, > > Ady via Syslinux said on Mon, Apr 06, 2015 at 09:57:02PM +0300: > >Can 'syslinux.efi' v.6.03 boot some media formatted with ISO9660? > > Not at this time, no. > > It took me quite some time to find that :-( Google didn't really help. > > I'd like to get a bit more details on this issue: > > 1/ Using syslinux.efi for PXE

Op 2014-06-20 om 15:56 schreef Ady: > > The Perl variant, isohybrid.in, seems to be getting left behind > regarding several patches. I don't recall whether there is at least > some mention in the isohybrid docs about the existence of 2 variants > included in Syslinux (and that is in addition to other isohybrid > methods outside Syslinux). Is there any reference? >

> Hi, > > Ady: > > _ Wiki should use more user-friendly language and "less deep" > > technical information. > > I tried to stay at the surface of isohybrid. > (Didier already asked for more depth about expert options.) My interpretation of Didier's questions is less depth and more user-friendly practical commands for end-users. Our points of view

> Hello, > > Ady via Syslinux said on Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 08:15:37PM +0200: > >_ Creating filesystem that _does_ conform to ISO-9660; > > I think the only issue is with a tag. That same image boots with grub > 0.99 I understand. My point is, in theory, "everything" is frequently expected to work as it was designed; in practice, it is not. So my suggestions

I posted this on the bugzilla page but I figured that on the mailing list it would get more attention. Please see http://bugzilla.syslinux.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49 for a description of my current issue. -- Thank you, Fernando Reyes GPG BDD75DD7 Mission Accomplish, Inc. http://missionaccomplish.com Email:design at missionaccomplish.com Tel: 7187100008 Cell: 3479275477

Hi folks, I've been prompted to look at using isohybrid for the Debian CD images that I'm producing. This looks like a good plan for the i386/amd64 images we make, so as to make them bootable from USB by default. However, it's likely to make things slightly more difficult in terms of producing the images themselves: we want to make them available via jigdo as well as via full download

Hi, we are the developers of an alternative to mkisofs: program xorriso from libburnia-project.org . The current development cycle is about support for creating bootable CDs, DVDs, BDs. So we look for testers and for advise about ISOLINUX specifics. The example from the ISOLINUX wiki is supposed to work if you replace "mkisofs" by "xorriso -as mkisofs". I.e: xorriso -as

Hi, i wrote: > > Well, it is about really usable capabilities of isohybrid, Ady wrote: > but their practical combination, usage, effects, > goals... are not expressed clearly enough for the common user to put in > practice. How to express the embarrassing fact that ISOLINUX is not ready for UEFI but isohybrid is ? http://www.syslinux.org/wiki/index.php/Isohybrid#UEFI would

On 11/24/2013 09:23 PM, Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi wrote: > On 11/23/2013 09:35 AM, Carl Duff wrote: >> -- Re-sent as original may be stuck at awaiting "authorisation" (originally >> sent before I joined the mailing list) >> >> Hi All, >> >> It is impossible to boot Linux-based ISOs that use Syslinux 6.02 via CD or >> DVD on older - non-UEFI -

Hi, i have implemented in xorriso the equivalents of isohybrid.c options --mac and --uefi. There remains the question how to ensure that the submitted MBR is prepared for the 32 byte mock-up of an APM Block0. I see in git of may 2012 that all mbr/isohdp[fp]x*.bin begin by 33 ed 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90