similar to: VMware with UEFI fails to boot

On Sun, Feb 2, 2014 at 12:34 PM, Conrad Kostecki <ck at conrad-kostecki.de> wrote: > On Sun, Feb 2, 2014 at 7:18 AM, Conrad Kostecki <ck at conrad-kostecki.de> wrote: >> On Sat, Feb 1, 2014 at 8:50 PM, Ady <ady-sf at hotmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> On Sat, Feb 1, 2014 at 21:07, Gene Cumm <gene.cumm at gmail.com> wrote: >>>> > Known

On Sun, Feb 2, 2014 at 1:53 PM, Conrad Kostecki <ck at conrad-kostecki.de> wrote: > On Sun, Feb 2, 2014 at 12:34 PM, Conrad Kostecki <ck at conrad-kostecki.de> wrote: Gene wrote: >>> Yes however I have no clue on the reliability of your system for building Syslinux. I can provide some test binaries if you would like. >> That would be a good idea! >> I've

Hi! I have difficulties using WineTools 2.1.0 with WINEPREFIX set. It does not matter whether use wineprefixcreate or not. I want to start a new wine-Konfiguration from scratch: export WINEPREFIX=$HOME/.wine wineprefixcreate (or not) wt > /tmp/Fehlermeldungen.wt 2>&1 When I try "Create a fake windows drive", WineTools doesn't create one although it said it did! I have

i try to configre wine using winetools, but don't get any furtherin base setup than accepting the licence agreement of internet explorer. it doesn't make any difference if i try to install from cd or internet. on the console, where i started winetools you can read: linux:~> wt Wine 20041201 wine is executed as "wine" Parameters are "" Version of Wine is OK.

On Sat, Feb 1, 2014 at 8:50 PM, Ady <ady-sf at hotmail.com> wrote: > >> On Sat, Feb 1, 2014 at 21:07, Gene Cumm <gene.cumm at gmail.com> wrote: >> > Known issue. http://bugzilla.syslinux.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35 and >> perhaps a few others but this should be resolved in the master branch. >> > I just committed my fix this morning so there's no -pre

On Sat, Feb 1, 2014 at 21:07, Gene Cumm <gene.cumm at gmail.com> wrote: > Known issue. http://bugzilla.syslinux.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35 and perhaps a few others but this should be resolved in the master branch. > I just committed my fix this morning so there's no -pre release yet. Is that really fixed in git? I've checkout syslinux about one hour ago from git. I ran a make all

On Sun, Feb 2, 2014 at 7:18 AM, Conrad Kostecki <ck at conrad-kostecki.de> wrote: > On Sat, Feb 1, 2014 at 8:50 PM, Ady <ady-sf at hotmail.com> wrote: >> >>> On Sat, Feb 1, 2014 at 21:07, Gene Cumm <gene.cumm at gmail.com> wrote: >>> > Known issue. http://bugzilla.syslinux.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35 and >>> perhaps a few others but this should

On 2014?03?08? 05:56, Gene Cumm wrote: > In /etc/vmware/vmnet8/dhcpd/dhcpd.conf I added the following: > > host 7x { > hardware ethernet 00:0C:29:38:6B:6E; > filename "e6/bootx64.efi"; > next-server 172.21.1.1; > # option vendor-encapsulated-options >

Hi All, My PXE configurations works fine for a bios PXE (the server in legacy mode) but hangs in an EUFI mode. Look like it can transfer the bootx64.efi but not the next one ldlinux.e64 Any ideas? Thanks Software> syslinux ver 6.3 atftp 7.1 Log server side >> Booting Embedded LOM 1 Port 1 : HP Ethernet 1Gb 4-port 331i Adapter - NIC (PXE IPv4) >> Booting PXE over

On Sat, Mar 8, 2014 at 2:05 AM, Steven Shiau <steven at nchc.org.tw> wrote: > Hi Gene, > Thanks. As you mentioned, atftpd has better logging, and my files are > smaller than 92 MB, so I switched to atftpd for testing. Now I could > find that somehow after bootx64.efi is downloaded by client, the next > ldlinux.e64 has never been fetched by client: > ====================

Dear List, we are currently using Samba 3.0.4 (rpm from Sernet - http://ftp.sernet.de/pub/samba/) on SuSE 8.2 with XP SP2-clients. The problem is: When we try to upgrade to Samba 3.0.7, the clients can't load the users profile, the error message says, that it can't find the path (though it works well for 3.0.4). Here is a snippet of the error messages in log.smb with log level 4:

I installed the latest R-package "R-2.1.1-1.rh4AS.i686.rpm" on a Red Hat Desktop 4 (RH EL4) machine. When I try to get help by the help.start() command an error message appears: ----- > help.start() Making links in per-session dir ... If '/usr/bin/mozilla' is already running, it is *not* restarted, and you must switch to its window. Otherwise, be patient ... sh:

On Thu, Mar 5, 2015 at 2:03 PM, Jorge Cisneros via Syslinux <syslinux at zytor.com> wrote: > Hi All, > > My PXE configurations works fine for a bios PXE (the server in legacy > mode) but hangs in an EUFI mode. Look like it can transfer the bootx64.efi > but not the next one ldlinux.e64 > > > Any ideas? My latest personally-published binaries.

Hello, I am facing a problem when rebuilding Samba 3.4.8dfsg2 on Debian Testing. Command used: "dpkg-buildpackage -uc -us -rfakeroot --source-option=--format=1.0" Linking bin/smbcontrol /usr/bin/ld: /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/4.4.4/../../../../lib/libunwind-ptrace.a(_UPT_access_fpreg.o): relocation R_X86_64_32S against `_UPT_reg_offset' can not be used when making a shared

Good Morning, I tried using gdb, but that doesn't work for me: $ ulimit -c unlimited $ sudo systemctl restart dovecot $ sudo -E getmail getmail version 5.13 Copyright (C) 1998-2019 Charles Cazabon.? Licensed under the GNU GPL version 2. SimpleIMAPSSLRetriever:peter.nabbefeld at gmx.de@imap.gmx.net:993: getmailrc: operation error (child pid 19702 killed by signal 6) ? 1 messages (12551

Hello List, on a windows-pc are files with an EURO-Sign "?" included in the filenames. This is working between all XP and 2000 Clients. But if i try to access such a file from a linux-box, I cannot read this files. I switched to the german charset with EURO Sign but no success. Then i tried the cifs instead of smbfs. But the same effect. Switching to UTF-8 doesn't work too.

On 2014?03?08? 20:57, Gene Cumm wrote: > Please try 6.03-pre6. I see a regression on 6.03-pre7 with EFI64 netboot > >> > Another thing you I'd like to mentioned is, after bootx64.efi was >> > downloaded, the next download for ldlinux.e64 was about 15 secs later. >> > Is that normal? > When it's successful for me, it takes 0.2s from the beginning of >

On Sun, Dec 2, 2018 at 9:29 PM Ady Ady via Syslinux <syslinux at zytor.com> wrote: > > > > > _ target/EFI/BOOT/SYSLINUX.CFG > > > > I don't think that exists? (see list below) > > > In our "first test" (simple boot prompt), we created > "target/EFI/BOOT/SYSLINUX.CFG". In our "second test" we _added_ >

On Mon, Dec 3, 2018 at 10:02 AM Ady Ady via Syslinux <syslinux at zytor.com> wrote: > > > Now it is just dd, mkfs and copy in the files we need. > > One less thing to worry about keeping versions consistent. > > > > > > I just noticed those 2 files that were added by > > > > syslinux -i boot.img > > > > (right?) > > > >

> Now it is just dd, mkfs and copy in the files we need. > One less thing to worry about keeping versions consistent. > > > I just noticed those 2 files that were added by > > > syslinux -i boot.img > > > (right?) > > > > > > Yes, those 2 files came from your 'syslinux' command (in your other > > email). We don't want anything