similar to: pxelinux paid support / development

On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 7:55 PM, Gene Cumm <gene.cumm at gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 7:15 PM, Gene Cumm <gene.cumm at gmail.com> wrote: >> On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 6:52 PM, Schlomo Schapiro <schlomo at schapiro.org> wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> On 10 March 2014 18:13, Eric PEYREMORTE <eric.peyremorte at iut-valence.fr>wrote:

Le 11/03/2014 10:32, Eric PEYREMORTE a ?crit : > Le 11/03/2014 00:56, Gene Cumm a ?crit : >> On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 7:55 PM, Gene Cumm <gene.cumm at gmail.com> wrote: >>> On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 7:15 PM, Gene Cumm <gene.cumm at gmail.com> wrote: >>>> On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 6:52 PM, Schlomo Schapiro >>>> <schlomo at schapiro.org> wrote:

On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 7:15 PM, Gene Cumm <gene.cumm at gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 6:52 PM, Schlomo Schapiro <schlomo at schapiro.org> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On 10 March 2014 18:13, Eric PEYREMORTE <eric.peyremorte at iut-valence.fr>wrote: >> >>> Ok i give up. I will stick with the old version version (4.07) which works

Le 11/03/2014 00:56, Gene Cumm a ?crit : > On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 7:55 PM, Gene Cumm <gene.cumm at gmail.com> wrote: >> On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 7:15 PM, Gene Cumm <gene.cumm at gmail.com> wrote: >>> On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 6:52 PM, Schlomo Schapiro <schlomo at schapiro.org> wrote: >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> On 10 March 2014 18:13,

On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 6:52 PM, Schlomo Schapiro <schlomo at schapiro.org> wrote: > Hi, > > On 10 March 2014 18:13, Eric PEYREMORTE <eric.peyremorte at iut-valence.fr>wrote: > >> Ok i give up. I will stick with the old version version (4.07) which works >> well with dell 380 and 790. >> >> I tried to understand what happened between 4.07 and 5 but i

Hi, first of all I would like to voice my deep gratitude to all syslinux developers for this really important software. I am using it in all my automation projects and could not manage without. Unfortunately now I stumbled upon a problem where I am out of my wits and need some help. The core problem is that HTTP transfers by gpxelinux.0 are very slow. Sadly this problem seems to be somehow

Hi, I finally managed to test pxelinux 4.10 pre17 in our VMware environment and can report that HTTP booting seems to work reliably now. Downloads are fairly fast. As a side note, rosh "ls" and "pwd" commands now work as expected with a HTTP TFTP prefix, cool! I'll leave it in production use now and report about any further issues. Can you already tell when a 4.10

?Hi,? On 10 March 2014 18:13, Eric PEYREMORTE <eric.peyremorte at iut-valence.fr>wrote: > Ok i give up. I will stick with the old version version (4.07) which works > well with dell 380 and 790. > > I tried to understand what happened between 4.07 and 5 but i don't have > the skill to understand low level c. > > Seems that the memory management changed a lot, maybe

Hi, thanks for writing cptime, after manually adding it to the Makefile of a lwip git checkout it compiled fine (same about prdhcp) (only isohybrid complained about a missing uuid/uuid.h)... I have a 64bit VM with VMXNET3 and go there this result: [image: cptime.png] (can everybody see the picture?) The download of a 180MB large file (Parted Magic initrd) takes between 60 and 72 seconds,

For me the motivation for gpxelinux.0 was the HTTP support. If this would work reliably in newer versions then I could happily live without a iPXE-based pxelinux. On 9 October 2013 13:36, Ferenc Wagner <wferi at niif.hu> wrote: > "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa at zytor.com> writes: > > > The gPXE in the Syslinux tree is ridiculously old. We could either > >

Hi Everyone. is there a need to have on searching the configuration file the request for the "odd ip addresses" ? Let me explain: from /doc/pxelinux.txt : ... Next, it will search for the config file using its own IP address in upper case hexadecimal, e.g. 192.0.2.91 -> C000025B (you can use the included progam "gethostip" to compute the hexadecimal IP address for

Hi, We only have Dell computers here. We have about 100 optiplex 380. Here is a link to download my wireshark traces : http://dl.free.fr/qgCPEM5Uo In this traces i tested pxelinux and lpxelinux 6.03 on optiplex 740(the one working) and optiplex 380. pxelinux works on both computers but very slowly on 380 as seen in traces. lpxelinux works only on 740. On 380 it seems to enter in a kind of

Hello SysLinux Team, I have recently installed version 5.0of SysLinuxwhat may be I should not have done so. Now my problem is, that everytime I start via PXE (gpxe) I only get the boot: prompt and not the menu as expected (all was working fine with previous versions incl 4.06) In the server log I can see atftpd serving some files to the workstation but not as before where it tried to find the

> Tried this out as follows: > > UI vesamenu.c32 > DEFAULT bootlocal > prompt 0 > > menu title Host Provisioning Tool > menu INCLUDE pxelinux.cfg/graphics.conf > MENU AUTOBOOT Starting Local System in # seconds > MENU BACKGROUND splash.jpg > > label bootlocal > menu label ^Boot This Host > KERNEL localboot.c32 >

Hi >On Wed, 24 Jul, at 03:48:14PM, Matt Fleming wrote: >> On Wed, 24 Jul, at 09:04:17PM, Victor Sudakov wrote: >> > memtest86 does not work any more after upgrading PXELINUX to 6.01. >> > When trying to boot, I get the following message: >> > >> > PXELINUX 6.01 2013-07-04 Copyright (C) 1994-2013 H. Peter Anvin et al >> > Loading memtest86...

Our site has many Dell OptiPlex 790s, all of which are unable to use the 'localboot' PXELINUX option as they either hang at 'Booting from local disk...' or immediately reboot depending on which SYSLINUX version is used. Many people have suggested using chain.c32 to chain load the local disk as a workaround, but this causes problems with Windows 7 BitLocker as it detects the chain

Matt Fleming wrote: > > > > memtest86 does not work any more after upgrading PXELINUX to 6.01. > > When trying to boot, I get the following message: > > > > PXELINUX 6.01 2013-07-04 Copyright (C) 1994-2013 H. Peter Anvin et al > > Loading memtest86... ok > > Booting kernel failed: invalid argument > > boot: > > What was the previous version

> Hello, > > I'm experiencing an issue where if I use vesamenu.c32 with PXELINUX 6.03 when network booting a virtual machine hosted on VMware ESXi 6.0, it hangs (the version message is printed and then nothing - the VM has to be powered off and back on again). > > This happens no matter if I choose the E1000 network interface or the VMXNET3 network interface when creating the

Dear Colleagues, memtest86 does not work any more after upgrading PXELINUX to 6.01. When trying to boot, I get the following message: PXELINUX 6.01 2013-07-04 Copyright (C) 1994-2013 H. Peter Anvin et al Loading memtest86... ok Booting kernel failed: invalid argument boot: The config is simple: DEFAULT memtest label memtest kernel memtest86 Any ideas? What additional information can I

Additional information: I was tried it with 2 virtualbox (version 4.2.14r86644).1rst: debian weezy with isc-dhcp-server, pxelinux5.01, pxelinux 6.00, tftp-hpa2nd: empty virtualbox booting from virtual network card. So memtest 4.1 and 4.2 worked with pxelinux 4.06 Peter > Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2013 09:02:30 +0100 > From: matt at console-pimps.org > To: coolpet80 at hotmail.com > CC: