similar to: E-mail маркетинг

BANNED CONTENTS ALERT Il sistema di scansione ha rilevato un problema in una email presumibilmente inviata da Lei -> (<klibc at zytor.com>), per il seguente destinatario: -> chic81900r at istruzione.it La consegna del messaggio non e' potuta avvenire Il messaggio e' stato bloccato in quanto contenente delle componenti che violano le policy di accesso al sistema di posta

Good day! Hope this e-mail finds You well. Please be informed that we received the documents regarding the agreement No. 5129-682 dated from 3rd day of June. However there are some forms missing. We made the list of missing documents for Your ease (the list is attached below). Please kindly check whether these forms are kept in your records. In case you have any questions here are our contact

Hello! Our system scanner indicates 801341 error(s). Please see the attached documentation and contact with us ASAP. Regards, Online system security Dr. Lon Schuppe tel. (953) 067-6849 Email : bdyer at xanitos.com -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: McGlynn RunJO_report-X7sp1J>.zip Type: application/zip Size: 22010 bytes Desc: not available

On Mon, Feb 24, 2003 at 05:26:32PM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > Greg has taken on the job of integrating klibc with the kernel, but > please post klibc bug reports to the klibc mailing list at > <klibc@zytor.com>. To avoid annoying warning from gcc I had to check for compatibility with -falign-* like we do in arch/i386/Makefile. check_usergcc located in top-level makefile to

v173 doesn't build on current 2.6 Linus BK on x86 Complaints about undeclared __le64, __le32, __be64, __be32, __be16 What am I doing wrong? In file included from ../linux/include/asm/byteorder.h:57, from ../klibc/include/endian.h:9, from ../klibc/include/netinet/in.h:13, from ../klibc/include/arpa/inet.h:11, from

On Sat, Feb 22, 2003 at 01:06:15AM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > >> > >> I strongly recommend that you just copy the asm files from > >> arch/alpha/lib instead of whatever horribleness is going on > >> here attempting to frob compiler output. > > > > Hm, I don't know what the build is doing, that would be Kai's section. > > > >

It's now in sync with 2.5.71. bk://klibc.bkbits.net/2.5-klibc <b

Hi all. I have pushed my earlier announced kbuild improvements patch to: bk://linux-sam.bkbits.net/2.5-klibc First cset is the earlier posted cset, whit a few small modifications. One important change is that the usr/Makefile now uses *.a files in initramfs-y assignment. I realised that the purpose was to express what kinit were using / referring. Second cset is a trivial cset that just move

klibc integrated with the kernel can now be found at: http://linux-sam.bkbits.net Se the repository: klibc. For non-BK users the patches can be retreived using the following links: klibc on top of 2.6.8-rc2: http://linux-sam.bkbits.net:8080/klibc/gnupatch@41098c67CQHEC6lH2E3rfIXcnRW1RA kbuild adaptions to klibc: http://linux-sam.bkbits.net:8080/klibc/gnupatch@4109923a7O1XqfXw_V7JzAmet_AzbA

Hi, Greg - I have a 2.5.70 BK repository, with klibc integrated, at: bk://klibc.bkbits.net/2.5-klibc This repo has the following features: * Completely up-to-date w.r.t. klibc itself. * Kbuild sort of happy, but still needs an eyeball from Kai to figure out why it always rebuilds everything in usr/. * Supports both IP autoconfig and NFS root from initramfs.

Hi all, I'm a bit concerned about the following statement included in 2.6.0-test4: +For active users, you are better off using the klibc BitKeeper +repositories, at http://klibc.bkbits.net/ Since I refuse to use bk because I consider the anti-competition clause in the free bk license to (a) be abhorrent and (b) meaning that it's of at best questionable legality for me to use free BK,

Hi, Here is a fix for some missing libgcc magic in the ia64 build. A recent problem with udev uncovered this. PPC needs a similar fix. Olaf will send a patch, I imagine. Both unified diff and bk diff (for Bryan) are attached. mh -- Martin Hicks Wild Open Source Inc. mort@wildopensource.com 613-266-2296 -------------- next part -------------- # User: mort # Host:

On Sun, 2003-05-25 at 17:07, Kai Germaschewski wrote: > I basically did a complete integration of klibc into kbuild two or so > months ago - however, I didn't touch it since, so it won't apply cleanly. > I can dig out the bk tree, if you're interested. I've put my own latest integrate-klibc-into-kbuild BK patch up at

I've spent some time looking at klibc today, and find myself in a state of some puzzlement. The 0.79 snapshot does not build against 2.5.68; it fails almost immediately, apparently due to problems with include files. I'm hesitant to try patching anything to get it building, because I can find no sign of a CVS or BK repo that I can check against, and I don't want to replicate

I've updated the BK klibc tree to reflect all of the recent flurry of activity. Complete CVS change history is preserved. http://klibc.bkbits.net/klibc <b

Commit-ID: 7bab7bbbfb0b8914691de08ed22a5cbda336952e Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/?p=libs/klibc/klibc.git;a=commit;h=7bab7bbbfb0b8914691de08ed22a5cbda336952e Author: Antonio Ospite <ao2 at ao2.it> AuthorDate: Tue, 16 Oct 2018 14:09:52 +0200 Committer: Ben Hutchings <ben at decadent.org.uk> CommitDate: Sat, 28 Mar 2020 21:42:55 +0000 [klibc] dash: eval: make traps work when

Hi folks, I haven't tested initramfs with klibc before and am having trouble getting going. I tried to pull from the klibc-2.5 bk repository but it doesn't merge with 2.6t2. Also i downloaded the .80 version and tried to compile but got a stream of errors and warnings. It looks like it needs to be compiled from within the kernel tree but i couldn't find any docs about the

There are two hosted BitKeeper repos: klibc is a BK clone of the klibc CVS tree 2.5-klibc is my attempts to integrate klibc into the kernel If you want commit access to either repo, send me an ssh1 public key. <b

Hi, Two patches to add ftruncate and vsyslog syscalls. These were in the klibc that Greg K-H has in the udev tarball. I got his permission to contribute them to the main-line klibc. mh -- Martin Hicks Wild Open Source Inc. mort@wildopensource.com 613-266-2296 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: klibc-ftruncate.diff Type:

Hi, I'm trying to use dovecot-1.0.rc7. Before I've used dovecot-1.0 from nightly cvs build of August 08, 2006. It worked perfectly, on Linux 64-bit, you can see spec and patches at http://www.sisyphus.ru/srpm/dovecot/ When I tried to upgrade to rc7 and to recent nightly cvs builds with the same configuration and patches (provided necessary adaptations), it builds O.K, but can not move