similar to: Help needed for bug 58556

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 1700 matches similar to: "Help needed for bug 58556"

2014 Jan 31
3
Help needed for bug 58556
----- Mail original ----- > De: "Ilia Mirkin" <imirkin at alum.mit.edu> > ?: "pierre morrow" <pierre.morrow at free.fr> > Cc: nouveau at lists.freedesktop.org > Envoy?: Vendredi 31 Janvier 2014 21:16:40 > Objet: Re: [Nouveau] Help needed for bug 58556 > Unfortunately this is a *massive* bug... and confused by the "other" > very
2014 Feb 04
1
Help needed for bug 58556
I think we had the wrong culprit: I just tried PCI-disabling the NVAC card (and keeping the NV96 one), and it just works: no garbage screen, and moreover, I get no hangs nor errors when enabling acceleration! I'll spend some time comparing both outputs (without NVAC, and without NV96) to find out what the NVAC is doing wrong. Pierre > On 31 Jan 2014, at 23:58, Ilia Mirkin <imirkin at
2014 Jan 31
0
Help needed for bug 58556
On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 8:09 AM, <pierre.morrow at free.fr> wrote: > Hello List, > > I am trying to solve bug 58556 [1], but I will need some help as I don't > understand all that is going on. Unfortunately this is a *massive* bug... and confused by the "other" very similar but apparently not identical bug in the system. > > The system is composed of an
2012 Dec 20
32
[Bug 58556] New: MacBook Pro 5, 1 with nVidia 9400m and 9600m, scrambled screen
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=58556 Priority: medium Bug ID: 58556 Assignee: nouveau at lists.freedesktop.org Summary: MacBook Pro 5,1 with nVidia 9400m and 9600m, scrambled screen QA Contact: xorg-team at lists.x.org Severity: major Classification: Unclassified OS: other
2014 Jan 31
0
Help needed for bug 58556
On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 5:39 PM, <pierre.morrow at free.fr> wrote: > De: "Ilia Mirkin" <imirkin at alum.mit.edu> > > Unfortunately this is a *massive* bug... and confused by the "other" > > very similar but apparently not identical bug in the system. > > > > What happens if you only enable acceleration on the NVAC card? (e.g. > > by
2016 Oct 18
2
NVAC "No Signal"
On 18.10.2016 09:35, Karol Herbst wrote: > how sure are you, that this is needed for _every_ nvac? > Thank you for asking. If you consider, as relevant, referring to the original commit: "drm/nouveau/disp/g94: implement workaround for dvi issue on fx380" https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=2a4bd8a <quote> Fixes the second DVI output
2016 Oct 18
4
NVAC "No Signal"
Fixes "No Signal" via HDMI from NVIDIA Corporation ION VGA (rev b1) Ref. "drm/nouveau/disp/g94: implement workaround for dvi issue on fx380" https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=2a4bd8a The last working Fedora kernel 4.8.0-0.rc0.git3.1.fc25 Patched and tested with: $ modinfo -n nouveau
2010 Apr 06
66
[Bug 27501] New: nVidia 9600M GT (Macbook Pro current model) is unable to boot
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=27501 Summary: nVidia 9600M GT (Macbook Pro current model) is unable to boot Product: xorg Version: unspecified Platform: x86-64 (AMD64) OS/Version: Linux (All) Status: NEW Severity: critical Priority: medium Component: Driver/nouveau
2014 Aug 17
4
[Bug 82726] New: [NV96][NVAC] [Regression] [Bisected] Probe failed with error -12
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=82726 Priority: medium Bug ID: 82726 Assignee: nouveau at lists.freedesktop.org Summary: [NV96][NVAC] [Regression] [Bisected] Probe failed with error -12 QA Contact: xorg-team at lists.x.org Severity: blocker Classification: Unclassified OS: Linux (All)
2010 Oct 26
8
[Bug 31139] New: Wake from sleep doesn't turn on display(s)
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31139 Summary: Wake from sleep doesn't turn on display(s) Product: xorg Version: git Platform: x86-64 (AMD64) OS/Version: Linux (All) Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: medium Component: Driver/nouveau AssignedTo: nouveau at lists.freedesktop.org
2010 Jan 08
10
[Bug 25952] New: GeForce 9800 GTX - nouveau_init takes ~ 1 minute to complete
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=25952 Summary: GeForce 9800 GTX - nouveau_init takes ~ 1 minute to complete Product: xorg Version: unspecified Platform: Other OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: high Component: Driver/nouveau AssignedTo: nouveau at
2014 Jun 13
2
[PATCH 1/2] drm/nouveau: Fix overlap while zeroing zcull regions
The specified stride was not correct, resulting in erases overlapping and part of the zcull regions being not erased at all. Signed-off-by: Pierre Moreau <pierre.morrow at free.fr> --- drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/core/engine/graph/nv50.c | 8 ++++---- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/core/engine/graph/nv50.c
2014 Sep 25
2
[PATCH 1/2] drm/nouveau/disp/nv50: Add PFB writes
This fix a GPU lockup on 9400M (NVAC) when using acceleration, see #27501. Signed-off-by: Pierre Moreau <pierre.morrow at free.fr> --- drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/core/engine/disp/nv50.c | 9 +++++++++ 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/core/engine/disp/nv50.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/core/engine/disp/nv50.c index a7efbff..e425604 100644 ---
2010 Feb 25
3
[PATCH 1/3] drm/nv50: Implement ctxprog/state generation.
This removes dependence on external firmware for NV50 generation cards. If the generated ctxprogs don't work for you for some reason, please report it. Signed-off-by: Marcin Ko?cielnicki <koriakin at 0x04.net> --- drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/Makefile | 2 +- drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_drv.h | 1 + drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nv50_graph.c | 74 +-
2015 Nov 22
2
nouveau: iowrite32 oops & warning at drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_fence.c:198
Hello, I'm seeing this warning and oops when trying to fuzz linus v4.4-rc1-290-g3ad5d7e with trinity. ------------[ cut here ]------------ WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 4308 at drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_fence.c:198 nouveau_fence_context_new+0x22e/0x270() CPU: 1 PID: 4308 Comm: trinity-c19 Tainted: G B 4.4.0-rc1+ #1 Hardware name: Dell Inc. OptiPlex 990/0D6H9T, BIOS A06 07/25/2011
2013 Aug 20
5
[Bug 68344] New: [piglit] shaders/glsl-fs-texture2d-dependent-4 randomly passes or fails on NVAA/NV50
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=68344 Priority: medium Bug ID: 68344 Assignee: nouveau at lists.freedesktop.org Summary: [piglit] shaders/glsl-fs-texture2d-dependent-4 randomly passes or fails on NVAA/NV50 QA Contact: xorg-team at lists.x.org Severity: normal Classification: Unclassified
2020 Aug 28
4
[PATCH] drm/nouveau: bail out of nouveau_channel_new if channel init fails
Unprivileged user can crash kernel by using DRM_IOCTL_NOUVEAU_CHANNEL_ALLOC ioctl. This was reported by trinity[1] fuzzer. [ 71.073906] nouveau 0000:01:00.0: crashme[1329]: channel failed to initialise, -17 [ 71.081730] BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 00000000000000a0 [ 71.088928] #PF: supervisor read access in kernel mode [ 71.094059] #PF: error_code(0x0000) - not-present
2012 Dec 27
7
[Bug 58806] New: failed to create kernel channel, -12 on G4 PPC
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=58806 Priority: medium Bug ID: 58806 Assignee: nouveau at lists.freedesktop.org Summary: failed to create kernel channel, -12 on G4 PPC QA Contact: xorg-team at lists.x.org Severity: normal Classification: Unclassified OS: Linux (All) Reporter: stefan at
2020 Nov 15
1
[PATCH] drm/nouveau: bail out of nouveau_channel_new if channel init fails
On Sun, Nov 15, 2020 at 6:43 PM Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil at debian.org> wrote: > > Hi, > > On Fri, Aug 28, 2020 at 11:28:46AM +0200, Frantisek Hrbata wrote: > > Unprivileged user can crash kernel by using DRM_IOCTL_NOUVEAU_CHANNEL_ALLOC > > ioctl. This was reported by trinity[1] fuzzer. > > > > [ 71.073906] nouveau 0000:01:00.0: crashme[1329]:
2014 Mar 24
3
[PATCH 11/12] drm/nouveau: support GK20A in nouveau_accel_init()
On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 05:42:33PM +0900, Alexandre Courbot wrote: > GK20A does not embed a dedicated COPY engine and thus cannot allocate > the copy channel that nouveau_accel_init() attempts to create. It also > lacks any display hardware, so the creation of a software channel does > not apply neither. Perhaps this should be two separate patches? > diff --git