similar to: Style: getFoo() vs foo()

> On 24 May 2018, at 20:19, Sam McCall via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > The coding guidelines say: > > Function names should be verb phrases (as they represent actions), and command-like function should be imperative. The name should be camel case, and start with a lower case letter (e.g. openFile() or isFoo()). > > This means that functions that

On 24.05.2018 13:11, Dean Michael Berris via llvm-dev wrote: > >> On 24 May 2018, at 20:19, Sam McCall via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >> >> The coding guidelines say: >>> Function names should be verb phrases (as they represent actions), and command-like function should be imperative. The name should be camel case, and start with a lower case

On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 1:52 PM, Renato Golin <rengolin at systemcall.org>wrote: > On 18 February 2011 21:34, Talin <viridia at gmail.com> wrote: > > Sorry, I meant DIBuilder. > > DIBuilder is the new DIFactory. I've been playing with it this week > and it's much easier and straightforward to use. I'm still having > problems to create arrays, though.

On 18 February 2011 21:34, Talin <viridia at gmail.com> wrote: > Sorry, I meant DIBuilder. DIBuilder is the new DIFactory. I've been playing with it this week and it's much easier and straightforward to use. I'm still having problems to create arrays, though. As far as I remember (from the 2010 meeting), the idea was to replace and deprecate DIFactory. I'm not saying we

Sorry, I meant DIBuilder. On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 1:32 PM, Talin <viridia at gmail.com> wrote: > I didn't know DIFactory existed until you mentioned it just now. > > And if folks are adding brand new classes to LLVM, can we not follow the > naming conventions in the developer guidelines? > > On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 5:14 AM, Renato Golin <rengolin at

I’d like to discuss revising the LLVM coding conventions to change the naming of variables to start with a lowercase letter. This should not be a discussion on the pain of such a transition, or how to get from here to there, but rather, if there is a better place to be. My arguments for the change are: 1. No other popular C++ coding style uses capitalized variable names. For instance here

Wow. I wasn't expecting such a voluminous reply -- some I agree with and some I don't. My apologies for an equally voluminous reply. On Wed, 19 Dec 2007, Tony Plack wrote: > > We're not discussing code or the inner workings of Asterisk or even > > changing the functionality of Asterisk, just what the proper order of > > the words should be. > > > >

On 08/09/2016 03:18 PM, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > On Tue, 9 Aug 2016 16:04:04 -0300 > francis picabia via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >> On Tue, Aug 9, 2016 at 3:35 PM, Rowland Penny via samba < >> samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: >> >>> On Tue, 9 Aug 2016 15:21:53 -0300 >>> francis picabia via samba <samba at

Xapians! If tomorrow Xapian search engine would achieved the same performance and result in searches as Google we would not be able to beat Google, because we would create only a copy of the searches that already exists from Google search engine. However there is a way to beat anyone, and there is a way to beat Google successfully as well just do not give up. Some see it as implementing Ajax, or

Greetings! I''m thinking of setting up a table of "domains", consisting of the core fields id, code, name, description, and type. Users is a domain, orders is a domain, recipes is a domain, etc. Domain attributes other than those covered by the core fields will go to, say, a user_other_fields table, recipe_other_fields, etc. I see the advantage of having all

Do local lambdas get named like variables or like functions? E.g. void foo() { auto helper = [](...){...}; // or auto Helper = [](...){...}; } My gut is that it should be lowercase (named like a function) since I got a weird feeling in my stomach seeing an upper-case name being called like a function in new code. -- Sean Silva -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment

Hi all, I am NOT a person with English as my mother language and I haven''t been programming long enough to be natural in these kind of things. And if that isn''t bad enough, I am a newbie on Rails too... So please enligthen. I am trying to build a simple tool for my shop. I have many products that I sell in my shop and of course I have many suppliers for the products. Thus

I''ve been looking into RESTful approaches lately. Everything I know my dog, Lelu, taught me. REST (REpresentational State Transfer) is an architectural technique for networked applications first described by Roy Fielding in his dissertation at UC Irvine-- excellent work, especially considering the tempting proximity of Newport Beach. As Lelu described it to me, REST strives

hey all, I'm just getting used to R and i'm having issues when it comes to reading my data in rows rather than columns. any good advice would be much appreciated ! here is the error: > data1 <- read.table(file.choose(),header=T) > x1 <- c(data1[1,1:5]) > shapiro.test(x1) Error in sort.int(x, na.last = na.last, decreasing = decreasing, ...) : 'x' must be atomic

On Tue, Aug 9, 2016 at 3:35 PM, Rowland Penny via samba < samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > On Tue, 9 Aug 2016 15:21:53 -0300 > francis picabia via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > I've been working with the third statement being true and exercising > > the rid option. > > Can I suggest you put it back, or add the RFC2307 attributes and use

> On 2015-Jun-15, at 16:29, Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at gmail.com> wrote: > > On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 3:56 PM Duncan P. N. Exon Smith <dexonsmith at apple.com> wrote: > I like this colour: > > enum class AliasKind /* or AliasCategory? */ { > Null, > Unknown, > Partial, > Complete > }; > > So, the only

Luke, I thought about what you said about nouns, but having trouble coming up with an example of what you mean. Would you be willing to rework my example into the words your talking about? I''m not asking for a solution here...this is more about how to think about the problem being solved. Mike B. ---------------------------------------------------------------- This message was sent

So, after looking at *doing* this, I'm left with more questions and no good answers. C++ has truly failed me today. This enum is currently designed (and even *documented* as being designed) to allow conversion-to-bool to detect whether any alias is possible (that is, only no-alias becomes false). This makes it *really* easy to write the overwhelming majority of test: if ("do things

In libnbd, we quickly learned that distinguishing between 'handle' (verb for acting on an object) and 'handle' (noun describing which object to act on) could get confusing; we solved it by renaming the latter to 'cookie'. Copy that approach into the NBD spec, and make it obvious that a cookie is opaque data from the point of view of the server. Makes no difference to

Hi all, I committed a first cut at blockless Givens/Whens/Thens to RSpec''s trunk: cd /path/to/rspec/project svn up cd rspec bin/spec examples/story/calculator.rb Take a look at examples/story/calculator.rb to see what''s going on. Needs docs!!!! Thoughts welcome. I''ve also got a cut at the plain text parser checked in, but it''s not hooked up to anything